# Skeleton-based Action Recognition on NTU-120 PURLS split protocol (60/60)

Source: [Skeleton-based Action Recognition on NTU-120 PURLS split protocol (60/60)](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/skeleton-based-action-recognition-on-ntu-120-purls-split-protocol-60-60>)

Collection index: [llms.txt](<https://www.sota2.com/research/llms.txt>)

Data updated: 2026-02-26T06:06:54.910Z

Evaluation of skeleton-based action recognition performance using the NTU-120 dataset under the specific PURLS split protocol defined as (60/60).

A research result applies to its stated dataset, split, metric and evaluation configuration. Compare like-for-like settings, preserve the metric's unit and direction, and distinguish paper-reported results from independent reproduction. The best result recorded here is not a claim of exhaustive, current global coverage.

| Scope | Recorded value |
| --- | --- |
| Task | Skeleton-based Action Recognition |
| Dataset (including any stated split) | NTU-120 PURLS split protocol (60/60) |
| Metric | Top-1 Accuracy |
| Unit | PERCENT |
| Direction | Higher is better |
| Results loaded | 6 of 6 |
| Coverage | All results currently returned for this benchmark |

Evaluation settings may differ between results. The original papers and recorded configurations are needed to establish comparability. A shared metric name alone does not establish an identical protocol.

## Metrics

- [Top-1 Accuracy](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/skeleton-based-action-recognition-on-ntu-120-purls-split-protocol-60-60.md?metric=Top-1%20Accuracy>): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT.

## Recorded results

| Method | Top-1 Accuracy | Result date | Report paper |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| TDSM | 27.21 | Not recorded | 68fa7a051e209131cea808ee |
| PURLS | 19.63 | Not recorded | 68fa7a051e209131cea808ee |
| ReViSE | 8.27 | Not recorded | 68fa7a051e209131cea808ee |
| SynSE | 7.73 | Not recorded | 68fa7a051e209131cea808ee |
| JPOSE | 7.65 | Not recorded | 68fa7a051e209131cea808ee |
| CADA-VAE | 5.67 | Not recorded | 68fa7a051e209131cea808ee |

### TDSM

Top-1 Accuracy: 27.21. Result ID: 698b69a57a967eddb76e6117.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa7a051e209131cea808ee.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa7a051e209131cea808ee.md>)

[Implementation](<https://kaist-viclab.github.io/TDSM_site>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Zero-shot":true,"Number of trials":10}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### PURLS

Top-1 Accuracy: 19.63. Result ID: 698b69a57a967eddb76e6116.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa7a051e209131cea808ee.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa73bd1e209131cea5e306.md>)

[Implementation](<https://github.com/azzh1/PURLS>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Zero-shot":true,"Publication":"CVPR 2024"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### ReViSE

Top-1 Accuracy: 8.27. Result ID: 698b69a57a967eddb76e6112.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa7a051e209131cea808ee.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa63311e209131ce9fd422.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Zero-shot":true,"Publication":"ICCV 2017"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### SynSE

Top-1 Accuracy: 7.73. Result ID: 698b69a57a967eddb76e6115.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa7a051e209131cea808ee.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa6a441e209131cea2726e.md>)

[Implementation](<https://github.com/skelemoa/synse-zsl>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Zero-shot":true,"Publication":"ICIP 2021"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### JPOSE

Top-1 Accuracy: 7.65. Result ID: 698b69a57a967eddb76e6113.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa7a051e209131cea808ee.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa66391e209131cea0eefa.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Zero-shot":true,"Publication":"ICCV 2019"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### CADA-VAE

Top-1 Accuracy: 5.67. Result ID: 698b69a57a967eddb76e6114.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa7a051e209131cea808ee.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa658a1e209131cea0af70.md>)

[Implementation](<https://github.com/edgarschnfld/CADA-VAE-PyTorch>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Zero-shot":true,"Publication":"CVPR 2019"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

Page 1 of 1. This is an index page, not the full collection.
