# Signature Verification on CEDAR Signature Database

Source: [Signature Verification on CEDAR Signature Database](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/signature-verification-on-cedar-signature-database>)

Collection index: [llms.txt](<https://www.sota2.com/research/llms.txt>)

Data updated: 2026-02-26T05:27:17.884Z

Evaluation of Signature Verification performance using the CEDAR Signature Database, typically measured using Accuracy, False Acceptance Rate (FAR), and False Rejection Rate (FRR).

A research result applies to its stated dataset, split, metric and evaluation configuration. Compare like-for-like settings, preserve the metric's unit and direction, and distinguish paper-reported results from independent reproduction. The best result recorded here is not a claim of exhaustive, current global coverage.

| Scope | Recorded value |
| --- | --- |
| Task | Signature Verification |
| Dataset (including any stated split) | CEDAR Signature Database |
| Metric | Accuracy |
| Unit | PERCENT |
| Direction | Higher is better |
| Results loaded | 6 of 6 |
| Coverage | All results currently returned for this benchmark |

Evaluation settings may differ between results. The original papers and recorded configurations are needed to establish comparability. A shared metric name alone does not establish an identical protocol.

## Metrics

- [Accuracy](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/signature-verification-on-cedar-signature-database.md?metric=Accuracy>): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT.

- [FAR](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/signature-verification-on-cedar-signature-database.md?metric=FAR>): Lower is better; unit: PERCENT.

- [FRR](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/signature-verification-on-cedar-signature-database.md?metric=FRR>): Lower is better; unit: PERCENT.

## Recorded results

| Method | Accuracy | Result date | Report paper |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Dutta et al. | 100 | Not recorded | 68fa63b91e209131cea005d4 |
| SigNet | 100 | Not recorded | 68fa63b91e209131cea005d4 |
| Graph matching | 92.1 | Not recorded | 68fa63b91e209131cea005d4 |
| Surroundedness features | 91.67 | Not recorded | 68fa63b91e209131cea005d4 |
| Zernike moments | 83.6 | Not recorded | 68fa63b91e209131cea005d4 |
| Word Shape (GSC) | 78.5 | Not recorded | 68fa63b91e209131cea005d4 |

### Dutta et al.

Accuracy: 100. Result ID: 698c1579f729bc7f68e83069.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa63b91e209131cea005d4.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"#Signers":"55"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### SigNet

Accuracy: 100. Result ID: 698c1579f729bc7f68e8306a.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa63b91e209131cea005d4.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa63b91e209131cea005d4.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"#Signers":"55"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### Graph matching

Accuracy: 92.1. Result ID: 698c1579f729bc7f68e83067.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa63b91e209131cea005d4.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"#Signers":"55"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### Surroundedness features

Accuracy: 91.67. Result ID: 698c1579f729bc7f68e83068.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa63b91e209131cea005d4.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"#Signers":"55"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### Zernike moments

Accuracy: 83.6. Result ID: 698c1579f729bc7f68e83066.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa63b91e209131cea005d4.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"#Signers":"55"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### Word Shape (GSC)

Accuracy: 78.5. Result ID: 698c1579f729bc7f68e83065.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa63b91e209131cea005d4.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"#Signers":"55"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

Page 1 of 1. This is an index page, not the full collection.