# Shadow Detection on Combined Dataset (UCF, UIUC, SBU) 1.0 (test)

Source: [Shadow Detection on Combined Dataset (UCF, UIUC, SBU) 1.0 (test)](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/shadow-detection-on-combined-dataset-ucf-uiuc-sbu-1-0-test>)

Collection index: [llms.txt](<https://www.sota2.com/research/llms.txt>)

Data updated: 2026-02-26T05:27:17.416Z

Evaluation of Shadow Detection performance on the combined test set comprising UCF, UIUC, and SBU datasets (Version 1.0).

A research result applies to its stated dataset, split, metric and evaluation configuration. Compare like-for-like settings, preserve the metric's unit and direction, and distinguish paper-reported results from independent reproduction. The best result recorded here is not a claim of exhaustive, current global coverage.

| Scope | Recorded value |
| --- | --- |
| Task | Shadow Detection |
| Dataset (including any stated split) | Combined Dataset (UCF, UIUC, SBU) 1.0 (test) |
| Metric | Accuracy |
| Unit | PERCENT |
| Direction | Higher is better |
| Results loaded | 3 of 3 |
| Coverage | All results currently returned for this benchmark |

Evaluation settings may differ between results. The original papers and recorded configurations are needed to establish comparability. A shared metric name alone does not establish an identical protocol.

## Metrics

- [Accuracy](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/shadow-detection-on-combined-dataset-ucf-uiuc-sbu-1-0-test.md?metric=Accuracy>): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT.

- [Shadow Accuracy](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/shadow-detection-on-combined-dataset-ucf-uiuc-sbu-1-0-test.md?metric=Shadow%20Accuracy>): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT.

- [Non-Shadow Accuracy](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/shadow-detection-on-combined-dataset-ucf-uiuc-sbu-1-0-test.md?metric=Non-Shadow%20Accuracy>): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT.

- [Std Dev](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/shadow-detection-on-combined-dataset-ucf-uiuc-sbu-1-0-test.md?metric=Std%20Dev>): Lower is better; unit: SCALAR.

## Recorded results

| Method | Accuracy | Result date | Report paper |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| patched-CNN | 91.03 | Not recorded | 68fa64251e209131cea02d59 |
| Stacked-CNN | 90.44 | Not recorded | 68fa64251e209131cea02d59 |
| Unary-Pairwise | 88.35 | Not recorded | 68fa64251e209131cea02d59 |

### patched-CNN

Accuracy: 91.03. Result ID: 698c0cbef729bc7f68e80551.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa64251e209131cea02d59.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa64251e209131cea02d59.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: Not recorded. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### Stacked-CNN

Accuracy: 90.44. Result ID: 698c0cbef729bc7f68e8054f.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa64251e209131cea02d59.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: Not recorded. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### Unary-Pairwise

Accuracy: 88.35. Result ID: 698c0cbef729bc7f68e80550.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa64251e209131cea02d59.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: Not recorded. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

Page 1 of 1. This is an index page, not the full collection.
