# Semantic Segmentation on Semantic3D official benchmark

Source: [Semantic Segmentation on Semantic3D official benchmark](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/semantic-segmentation-on-semantic3d-official-benchmark>)

Collection index: [llms.txt](<https://www.sota2.com/research/llms.txt>)

Data updated: 2026-02-26T05:35:28.929Z

Evaluation of Semantic Segmentation performance on the official Semantic3D benchmark configuration, reporting Overall Accuracy (OA), Average IoU (Av. IoU), and class-specific IoUs for various terrain and object categories.

A research result applies to its stated dataset, split, metric and evaluation configuration. Compare like-for-like settings, preserve the metric's unit and direction, and distinguish paper-reported results from independent reproduction. The best result recorded here is not a claim of exhaustive, current global coverage.

| Scope | Recorded value |
| --- | --- |
| Task | Semantic Segmentation |
| Dataset (including any stated split) | Semantic3D official benchmark |
| Metric | Average IoU |
| Unit | PERCENT |
| Direction | Higher is better |
| Results loaded | 10 of 10 |
| Coverage | All results currently returned for this benchmark |

Evaluation settings may differ between results. The original papers and recorded configurations are needed to establish comparability. A shared metric name alone does not establish an identical protocol.

## Metrics

- [Average IoU](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/semantic-segmentation-on-semantic3d-official-benchmark.md?metric=Average%20IoU>): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT.

- [Overall Accuracy (OA)](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/semantic-segmentation-on-semantic3d-official-benchmark.md?metric=Overall%20Accuracy%20(OA)>): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT.

- [IoU (Man made)](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/semantic-segmentation-on-semantic3d-official-benchmark.md?metric=IoU%20(Man%20made)>): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT.

- [IoU (Natural Vegetation)](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/semantic-segmentation-on-semantic3d-official-benchmark.md?metric=IoU%20(Natural%20Vegetation)>): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT.

- [IoU (High Vegetation)](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/semantic-segmentation-on-semantic3d-official-benchmark.md?metric=IoU%20(High%20Vegetation)>): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT.

- [IoU (Low Vegetation)](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/semantic-segmentation-on-semantic3d-official-benchmark.md?metric=IoU%20(Low%20Vegetation)>): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT.

- [IoU (Building)](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/semantic-segmentation-on-semantic3d-official-benchmark.md?metric=IoU%20(Building)>): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT.

- [IoU (Hardscape)](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/semantic-segmentation-on-semantic3d-official-benchmark.md?metric=IoU%20(Hardscape)>): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT.

- [IoU (Artifacts)](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/semantic-segmentation-on-semantic3d-official-benchmark.md?metric=IoU%20(Artifacts)>): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT.

- [IoU (Cars)](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/semantic-segmentation-on-semantic3d-official-benchmark.md?metric=IoU%20(Cars)>): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT.

## Recorded results

| Method | Average IoU | Result date | Report paper |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| ConvPoint | 76.5 | Not recorded | 68fa68d71e209131cea1e8f8 |
| SPGraph | 76.2 | Not recorded | 68fa68d71e209131cea1e8f8 |
| FKAConv | 74.6 | Not recorded | 68fa68d71e209131cea1e8f8 |
| FPCR | 72 | Not recorded | 68fa68d71e209131cea1e8f8 |
| PointGCR | 69.5 | Not recorded | 68fa68d71e209131cea1e8f8 |
| SnapNet | 67.4 | Not recorded | 68fa68d71e209131cea1e8f8 |
| EdgeConv | 64.4 | Not recorded | 68fa68d71e209131cea1e8f8 |
| PointNet++ | 63.1 | Not recorded | 68fa68d71e209131cea1e8f8 |
| TMLC-MS | 49.4 | Not recorded | 68fa68d71e209131cea1e8f8 |
| TML-PC | 39.1 | Not recorded | 68fa68d71e209131cea1e8f8 |

### ConvPoint

Average IoU: 76.5. Result ID: 698d87df8b517eb433222c9f.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa68d71e209131cea1e8f8.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa671b1e209131cea1448c.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: Not recorded. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### SPGraph

Average IoU: 76.2. Result ID: 698d87df8b517eb433222c9e.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa68d71e209131cea1e8f8.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa642f1e209131cea03453.md>)

[Implementation](<https://github.com/loicland/superpoint_graph>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: Not recorded. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### FKAConv

Average IoU: 74.6. Result ID: 698d87df8b517eb433222ca0.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa68d71e209131cea1e8f8.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa68d71e209131cea1e8f8.md>)

[Implementation](<https://github.com/valeoai/FKAConv>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"fusion":"true"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### FPCR

Average IoU: 72. Result ID: 698d87df8b517eb433222c9d.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa68d71e209131cea1e8f8.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: Not recorded. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### PointGCR

Average IoU: 69.5. Result ID: 698d87df8b517eb433222c9c.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa68d71e209131cea1e8f8.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: Not recorded. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### SnapNet

Average IoU: 67.4. Result ID: 698d87df8b517eb433222c9b.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa68d71e209131cea1e8f8.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: Not recorded. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### EdgeConv

Average IoU: 64.4. Result ID: 698d87df8b517eb433222c9a.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa68d71e209131cea1e8f8.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: Not recorded. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### PointNet++

Average IoU: 63.1. Result ID: 698d87df8b517eb433222c99.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa68d71e209131cea1e8f8.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa63641e209131ce9fe5a5.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: Not recorded. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### TMLC-MS

Average IoU: 49.4. Result ID: 698d87df8b517eb433222c98.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa68d71e209131cea1e8f8.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: Not recorded. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### TML-PC

Average IoU: 39.1. Result ID: 698d87df8b517eb433222c97.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa68d71e209131cea1e8f8.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: Not recorded. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

Page 1 of 1. This is an index page, not the full collection.
