# Sample Complexity Analysis on Multiclass Learning Agnostic Setting

Source: [Sample Complexity Analysis on Multiclass Learning Agnostic Setting](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/sample-complexity-analysis-on-multiclass-learning-agnostic-setting>)

Collection index: [llms.txt](<https://www.sota2.com/research/llms.txt>)

Data updated: 2026-04-28T10:41:32.133Z

Evaluation of the theoretical sample complexity bounds (e.g., O-notation) for Multiclass Learning algorithms operating under agnostic settings.

A research result applies to its stated dataset, split, metric and evaluation configuration. Compare like-for-like settings, preserve the metric's unit and direction, and distinguish paper-reported results from independent reproduction. The best result recorded here is not a claim of exhaustive, current global coverage.

| Scope | Recorded value |
| --- | --- |
| Task | Multiclass Learning |
| Dataset (including any stated split) | Multiclass Learning Agnostic |
| Metric | Sample Complexity Bound |
| Unit | OTHER |
| Direction | Lower is better |
| Results loaded | 4 of 4 |
| Coverage | All results currently returned for this benchmark |

Evaluation settings may differ between results. The original papers and recorded configurations are needed to establish comparability. A shared metric name alone does not establish an identical protocol.

## Metrics

- [Sample Complexity Bound](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/sample-complexity-analysis-on-multiclass-learning-agnostic-setting.md?metric=Sample%20Complexity%20Bound>): Lower is better; unit: OTHER.

## Recorded results

| Method | Sample Complexity Bound | Result date | Report paper |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| \[CEH+25\] | 1 | Not recorded | 69f03f6055a3c32af89fa41c |
| \[CEH+25\] | 1 | Not recorded | 69f03f6055a3c32af89fa41c |
| One-inclusion graph predictors (Corollary 1.2) | 1 | Not recorded | 69f03f6055a3c32af89fa41c |
| \[BCD+22\] | 1.5 | Not recorded | 69f03f6055a3c32af89fa41c |

### \[CEH+25\]

Sample Complexity Bound: 1. Result ID: 69f08e7047f34ce924d74455.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/69f03f6055a3c32af89fa41c.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/691bfe936750be83fe5cf4df.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Bound Type":"Upper Bound"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### \[CEH+25\]

Sample Complexity Bound: 1. Result ID: 69f08e7047f34ce924d74456.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/69f03f6055a3c32af89fa41c.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/691bfe936750be83fe5cf4df.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Bound Type":"Lower Bound"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### One-inclusion graph predictors (Corollary 1.2)

Sample Complexity Bound: 1. Result ID: 69f08e7047f34ce924d74457.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/69f03f6055a3c32af89fa41c.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/69f03f6055a3c32af89fa41c.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Bound Type":"Upper Bound"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### \[BCD+22\]

Sample Complexity Bound: 1.5. Result ID: 69f08e7047f34ce924d74454.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/69f03f6055a3c32af89fa41c.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa59081e209131ce9b3840.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Bound Type":"Upper Bound"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

Page 1 of 1. This is an index page, not the full collection.
