# Risk classification on AF Prediction Entire follow-up (test) Source: [Risk classification on AF Prediction Entire follow-up (test)]() Collection index: [llms.txt]() Data updated: 2026-06-11T09:56:17.951Z Evaluation of models performing risk classification using the test split of the AF Prediction Entire follow-up dataset, reporting metrics including Balanced Accuracy, Macro F1, and ROC AUC. A research result applies to its stated dataset, split, metric and evaluation configuration. Compare like-for-like settings, preserve the metric's unit and direction, and distinguish paper-reported results from independent reproduction. The best result recorded here is not a claim of exhaustive, current global coverage. | Scope | Recorded value | | --- | --- | | Task | Risk classification | | Dataset (including any stated split) | AF Prediction Entire follow-up (test) | | Metric | Balanced Accuracy | | Unit | PERCENT | | Direction | Higher is better | | Results loaded | 7 of 7 | | Coverage | All results currently returned for this benchmark | Evaluation settings may differ between results. The original papers and recorded configurations are needed to establish comparability. A shared metric name alone does not establish an identical protocol. ## Metrics - [Balanced Accuracy](): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT. - [Macro F1](): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT. - [Macro Precision](): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT. - [Macro Recall](): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT. - [ROC AUC](): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT. - [PRC AUC](): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT. ## Recorded results | Method | Balanced Accuracy | Result date | Report paper | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Short model | 63 | Not recorded | 6a28f37690966ade919c1998 | | Full model | 62.3 | Not recorded | 6a28f37690966ade919c1998 | | Linear model | 50 | Not recorded | 6a28f37690966ade919c1998 | | HAVOC | 50 | Not recorded | 6a28f37690966ade919c1998 | | C2HEST | 50 | Not recorded | 6a28f37690966ade919c1998 | | MHS | 50 | Not recorded | 6a28f37690966ade919c1998 | | CHARGE-AF | 49.9 | Not recorded | 6a28f37690966ade919c1998 | ### Short model Balanced Accuracy: 63. Result ID: 6a2a850efbc373592c281f2d. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Model Type":"Non-linear"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### Full model Balanced Accuracy: 62.3. Result ID: 6a2a850efbc373592c281f2c. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Model Type":"Non-linear"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### Linear model Balanced Accuracy: 50. Result ID: 6a2a850efbc373592c281f2e. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Model Type":"Linear"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### HAVOC Balanced Accuracy: 50. Result ID: 6a2a850efbc373592c281f2f. [Reporting paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: Not recorded. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### C2HEST Balanced Accuracy: 50. Result ID: 6a2a850efbc373592c281f31. [Reporting paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: Not recorded. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### MHS Balanced Accuracy: 50. Result ID: 6a2a850efbc373592c281f32. [Reporting paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: Not recorded. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### CHARGE-AF Balanced Accuracy: 49.9. Result ID: 6a2a850efbc373592c281f30. [Reporting paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: Not recorded. This record does not assert independent reproduction. Page 1 of 1. This is an index page, not the full collection.