# Respiratory Sound 4-Class Classification on ICBHI 2017 (60/40)

Source: [Respiratory Sound 4-Class Classification on ICBHI 2017 (60/40)](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/respiratory-sound-4-class-classification-on-icbhi-2017-60-40>)

Collection index: [llms.txt](<https://www.sota2.com/research/llms.txt>)

Data updated: 2026-02-26T05:54:32.723Z

Evaluation of respiratory sound classification performance, distinguishing between 4 distinct classes, using the ICBHI 2017 dataset (60/40 split).

A research result applies to its stated dataset, split, metric and evaluation configuration. Compare like-for-like settings, preserve the metric's unit and direction, and distinguish paper-reported results from independent reproduction. The best result recorded here is not a claim of exhaustive, current global coverage.

| Scope | Recorded value |
| --- | --- |
| Task | Respiratory sound 4-class classification |
| Dataset (including any stated split) | ICBHI 2017 (60/40) |
| Metric | Overall Score |
| Unit | PERCENT |
| Direction | Higher is better |
| Results loaded | 8 of 8 |
| Coverage | All results currently returned for this benchmark |

Evaluation settings may differ between results. The original papers and recorded configurations are needed to establish comparability. A shared metric name alone does not establish an identical protocol.

## Metrics

- [Overall Score](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/respiratory-sound-4-class-classification-on-icbhi-2017-60-40.md?metric=Overall%20Score>): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT.

- [Specificity](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/respiratory-sound-4-class-classification-on-icbhi-2017-60-40.md?metric=Specificity>): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT.

- [Sensitivity](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/respiratory-sound-4-class-classification-on-icbhi-2017-60-40.md?metric=Sensitivity>): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT.

## Recorded results

| Method | Overall Score | Result date | Report paper |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| RespireNet (CNN+CBA+BRC+FT) | 56.2 | Not recorded | 68fa69e41e209131cea249dc |
| RespireNet (CNN+CBA+BRC) | 55.7 | Not recorded | 68fa69e41e209131cea249dc |
| RespireNet (CNN base) | 55.2 | Not recorded | 68fa69e41e209131cea249dc |
| Ma et al. \[12\] | 52.3 | Not recorded | 68fa69e41e209131cea249dc |
| Ma et al. \[11\] | 50.2 | Not recorded | 68fa69e41e209131cea249dc |
| Serbes et al. | 49.9 | Not recorded | 68fa69e41e209131cea249dc |
| Chambres et al. | 49.4 | Not recorded | 68fa69e41e209131cea249dc |
| Jakovljevic et al. | 39.5 | Not recorded | 68fa69e41e209131cea249dc |

### RespireNet (CNN+CBA+BRC+FT)

Overall Score: 56.2. Result ID: 698def1cffc3901de099a479.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa69e41e209131cea249dc.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa69e41e209131cea249dc.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"architecture":"CNN","augmentation":"Concatenation-based augmentation","clipping":"Blank region clipping","fine-tuning":"device specific"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### RespireNet (CNN+CBA+BRC)

Overall Score: 55.7. Result ID: 698def1cffc3901de099a478.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa69e41e209131cea249dc.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa69e41e209131cea249dc.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"architecture":"CNN","augmentation":"Concatenation-based augmentation","clipping":"Blank region clipping"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### RespireNet (CNN base)

Overall Score: 55.2. Result ID: 698def1cffc3901de099a477.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa69e41e209131cea249dc.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa69e41e209131cea249dc.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"architecture":"CNN"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### Ma et al. \[12\]

Overall Score: 52.3. Result ID: 698def1cffc3901de099a476.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa69e41e209131cea249dc.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: Not recorded. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### Ma et al. \[11\]

Overall Score: 50.2. Result ID: 698def1cffc3901de099a475.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa69e41e209131cea249dc.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: Not recorded. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### Serbes et al.

Overall Score: 49.9. Result ID: 698def1cffc3901de099a474.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa69e41e209131cea249dc.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: Not recorded. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### Chambres et al.

Overall Score: 49.4. Result ID: 698def1cffc3901de099a473.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa69e41e209131cea249dc.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: Not recorded. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### Jakovljevic et al.

Overall Score: 39.5. Result ID: 698def1cffc3901de099a472.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa69e41e209131cea249dc.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: Not recorded. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

Page 1 of 1. This is an index page, not the full collection.
