# Referring Segmentation on RefCOCO+ FP (test)

Source: [Referring Segmentation on RefCOCO+ FP (test)](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/referring-segmentation-on-refcoco-plus-fp-test>)

Collection index: [llms.txt](<https://www.sota2.com/research/llms.txt>)

Data updated: 2026-02-27T08:47:46.511Z

Evaluation of Referring Segmentation performance on the FP (test) split of the RefCOCO+ dataset, measured using See, Say, and Segment metrics.

A research result applies to its stated dataset, split, metric and evaluation configuration. Compare like-for-like settings, preserve the metric's unit and direction, and distinguish paper-reported results from independent reproduction. The best result recorded here is not a claim of exhaustive, current global coverage.

| Scope | Recorded value |
| --- | --- |
| Task | Referring Segmentation |
| Dataset (including any stated split) | RefCOCO+ FP (test) |
| Metric | See Score |
| Unit | PERCENT |
| Direction | Higher is better |
| Results loaded | 3 of 3 |
| Coverage | All results currently returned for this benchmark |

Evaluation settings may differ between results. The original papers and recorded configurations are needed to establish comparability. A shared metric name alone does not establish an identical protocol.

## Metrics

- [See Score](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/referring-segmentation-on-refcoco-plus-fp-test.md?metric=See%20Score>): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT.

- [Say Score](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/referring-segmentation-on-refcoco-plus-fp-test.md?metric=Say%20Score>): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT.

- [Segment Score](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/referring-segmentation-on-refcoco-plus-fp-test.md?metric=Segment%20Score>): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT.

## Recorded results

| Method | See Score | Result date | Report paper |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| SESAME | 80 | Not recorded | 68fa71701e209131cea513b6 |
| Cascading | 75.03 | Not recorded | 68fa71701e209131cea513b6 |
| LISA | 51.32 | Not recorded | 68fa71701e209131cea513b6 |

### SESAME

See Score: 80. Result ID: 69a15a1635dfcabb00e678f0.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa71701e209131cea513b6.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa71701e209131cea513b6.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: Not recorded. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### Cascading

See Score: 75.03. Result ID: 69a15a1635dfcabb00e678ef.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa71701e209131cea513b6.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa71701e209131cea513b6.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: Not recorded. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### LISA

See Score: 51.32. Result ID: 69a15a1635dfcabb00e678ee.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa71701e209131cea513b6.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa730a1e209131cea5a0b2.md>)

[Implementation](<https://www.sota2.com/github.com/dvlab-research/LISA>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: Not recorded. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

Page 1 of 1. This is an index page, not the full collection.