# Reading Comprehension on CBT Named Entity (NE) (dev)

Source: [Reading Comprehension on CBT Named Entity (NE) (dev)](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/reading-comprehension-on-cbt-named-entity-ne-dev>)

Collection index: [llms.txt](<https://www.sota2.com/research/llms.txt>)

Data updated: 2026-02-26T05:27:16.185Z

Evaluation of Reading Comprehension performance on the development split of the Children's Book Test Named Entity subset, reporting Accuracy.

A research result applies to its stated dataset, split, metric and evaluation configuration. Compare like-for-like settings, preserve the metric's unit and direction, and distinguish paper-reported results from independent reproduction. The best result recorded here is not a claim of exhaustive, current global coverage.

| Scope | Recorded value |
| --- | --- |
| Task | Reading Comprehension |
| Dataset (including any stated split) | Children's Book Test (CBT) Named Entity (NE) (dev) |
| Metric | Accuracy |
| Unit | PERCENT |
| Direction | Higher is better |
| Results loaded | 12 of 12 |
| Coverage | All results currently returned for this benchmark |

Evaluation settings may differ between results. The original papers and recorded configurations are needed to establish comparability. A shared metric name alone does not establish an identical protocol.

## Metrics

- [Accuracy](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/reading-comprehension-on-cbt-named-entity-ne-dev.md?metric=Accuracy>): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT.

## Recorded results

| Method | Accuracy | Result date | Report paper |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| FG fine-grained gate | 79.1 | Not recorded | 68fa63a41e209131ce9fff99 |
| GA fine-grained gate | 78.9 | Not recorded | 68fa63a41e209131ce9fff99 |
| Munkhdalai & Yu (2016) | 78.2 | Not recorded | 68fa63a41e209131ce9fff99 |
| GA word char feat concat | 78.15 | Not recorded | 68fa63a41e209131ce9fff99 |
| GA scalar gate | 78.1 | Not recorded | 68fa63a41e209131ce9fff99 |
| Cui et al. (2016) | 77.8 | Not recorded | 68fa63a41e209131ce9fff99 |
| Sordoni et al. (2016) ensemble | 76.9 | Not recorded | 68fa63a41e209131ce9fff99 |
| GA word char concat | 76.8 | Not recorded | 68fa63a41e209131ce9fff99 |
| Trischler et al. (2016) ensemble | 76.6 | Not recorded | 68fa63a41e209131ce9fff99 |
| Kadlec et al. (2016) ensemble | 76.2 | Not recorded | 68fa63a41e209131ce9fff99 |
| Trischler et al. (2016) | 75.3 | Not recorded | 68fa63a41e209131ce9fff99 |
| Sordoni et al. (2016) | 75.2 | Not recorded | 68fa63a41e209131ce9fff99 |

### FG fine-grained gate

Accuracy: 79.1. Result ID: 698bfe57f729bc7f68e76537.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa63a41e209131ce9fff99.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa63a41e209131ce9fff99.md>)

[Implementation](<https://github.com/kimiyoung/fg-gating>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Architecture":"FG"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### GA fine-grained gate

Accuracy: 78.9. Result ID: 698bfe57f729bc7f68e76536.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa63a41e209131ce9fff99.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa63a41e209131ce9fff99.md>)

[Implementation](<https://github.com/kimiyoung/fg-gating>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Architecture":"GA"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### Munkhdalai & Yu (2016)

Accuracy: 78.2. Result ID: 698bfe57f729bc7f68e7653b.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa63a41e209131ce9fff99.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa63051e209131ce9fc644.md>)

[Implementation](<https://bitbucket.org/tsendeemts/nse>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: Not recorded. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### GA word char feat concat

Accuracy: 78.15. Result ID: 698bfe57f729bc7f68e76534.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa63a41e209131ce9fff99.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa63491e209131ce9fdb44.md>)

[Implementation](<https://github.com/bdhingra/ga-reader>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Architecture":"GA"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### GA scalar gate

Accuracy: 78.1. Result ID: 698bfe57f729bc7f68e76535.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa63a41e209131ce9fff99.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa63491e209131ce9fdb44.md>)

[Implementation](<https://github.com/bdhingra/ga-reader>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Architecture":"GA"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### Cui et al. (2016)

Accuracy: 77.8. Result ID: 698bfe57f729bc7f68e7653a.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa63a41e209131ce9fff99.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa663e1e209131cea0f22c.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: Not recorded. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### Sordoni et al. (2016) ensemble

Accuracy: 76.9. Result ID: 698bfe57f729bc7f68e7653d.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa63a41e209131ce9fff99.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa62da1e209131ce9fbb18.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Ensemble":true}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### GA word char concat

Accuracy: 76.8. Result ID: 698bfe57f729bc7f68e76533.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa63a41e209131ce9fff99.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa63491e209131ce9fdb44.md>)

[Implementation](<https://github.com/bdhingra/ga-reader>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Architecture":"GA"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### Trischler et al. (2016) ensemble

Accuracy: 76.6. Result ID: 698bfe57f729bc7f68e7653e.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa63a41e209131ce9fff99.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa62881e209131ce9f9f71.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Ensemble":true}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### Kadlec et al. (2016) ensemble

Accuracy: 76.2. Result ID: 698bfe57f729bc7f68e7653c.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa63a41e209131ce9fff99.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa629e1e209131ce9fa3d7.md>)

[Implementation](<https://github.com/rkadlec/asreader>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Ensemble":true}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### Trischler et al. (2016)

Accuracy: 75.3. Result ID: 698bfe57f729bc7f68e76539.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa63a41e209131ce9fff99.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa62881e209131ce9f9f71.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: Not recorded. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### Sordoni et al. (2016)

Accuracy: 75.2. Result ID: 698bfe57f729bc7f68e76538.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa63a41e209131ce9fff99.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa62da1e209131ce9fbb18.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: Not recorded. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

Page 1 of 1. This is an index page, not the full collection.
