# Reaction Feasibility Prediction on FREA Infeasible 1.0 (test)

Source: [Reaction Feasibility Prediction on FREA Infeasible 1.0 (test)](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/reaction-feasibility-prediction-on-frea-infeasible-1-0-test>)

Collection index: [llms.txt](<https://www.sota2.com/research/llms.txt>)

Data updated: 2026-05-11T08:16:19.884Z

Evaluation of models performing Reaction Feasibility Prediction on the test split of the FREA Infeasible 1.0 dataset.

A research result applies to its stated dataset, split, metric and evaluation configuration. Compare like-for-like settings, preserve the metric's unit and direction, and distinguish paper-reported results from independent reproduction. The best result recorded here is not a claim of exhaustive, current global coverage.

| Scope | Recorded value |
| --- | --- |
| Task | Reaction Feasibility Prediction |
| Dataset (including any stated split) | FREA Infeasible 1.0 (test) |
| Metric | Accuracy (%) |
| Unit | PERCENT |
| Direction | Higher is better |
| Results loaded | 28 of 28 |
| Coverage | All results currently returned for this benchmark |

Evaluation settings may differ between results. The original papers and recorded configurations are needed to establish comparability. A shared metric name alone does not establish an identical protocol.

## Metrics

- [Accuracy (%)](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/reaction-feasibility-prediction-on-frea-infeasible-1-0-test.md?metric=Accuracy%20(%25)>): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT.

- [F1 Score (%)](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/reaction-feasibility-prediction-on-frea-infeasible-1-0-test.md?metric=F1%20Score%20(%25)>): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT.

## Recorded results

| Method | Accuracy (%) | Result date | Report paper |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Theoretical Upper Bound | 100 | Not recorded | 6a016299dbc836b87d823180 |
| Claude-Sonnet-4.6 | 96.53 | Not recorded | 6a016299dbc836b87d823180 |
| Chemformer | 95.53 | Not recorded | 6a016299dbc836b87d823180 |
| BERT | 95.5 | Not recorded | 6a016299dbc836b87d823180 |
| DRFP | 95.1 | Not recorded | 6a016299dbc836b87d823180 |
| ToolEyes | 94.77 | Not recorded | 6a016299dbc836b87d823180 |
| Molecular | 93.27 | Not recorded | 6a016299dbc836b87d823180 |
| HarderMoE | 92.97 | Not recorded | 6a016299dbc836b87d823180 |
| ARMOR | 91.67 | Not recorded | 6a016299dbc836b87d823180 |
| Weighted Voting | 91.2 | Not recorded | 6a016299dbc836b87d823180 |
| PromptingLlama | 84.67 | Not recorded | 6a016299dbc836b87d823180 |
| DeepSeek-v4-flash | 84.67 | Not recorded | 6a016299dbc836b87d823180 |
| KNORA-U | 83.37 | Not recorded | 6a016299dbc836b87d823180 |
| Majority Voting | 83.23 | Not recorded | 6a016299dbc836b87d823180 |
| KNORA-E | 83.23 | Not recorded | 6a016299dbc836b87d823180 |
| Dora\_xgb | 79.6 | Not recorded | 6a016299dbc836b87d823180 |
| DES-KNN | 75.03 | Not recorded | 6a016299dbc836b87d823180 |
| StaticSel | 66.37 | Not recorded | 6a016299dbc836b87d823180 |
| Random Selection | 66.29 | Not recorded | 6a016299dbc836b87d823180 |
| MolecularT3Q | 64.1 | Not recorded | 6a016299dbc836b87d823180 |
| GPT-5.4-mini | 64.03 | Not recorded | 6a016299dbc836b87d823180 |
| PromptingT3Q | 61.83 | Not recorded | 6a016299dbc836b87d823180 |
| ChemformerT3Q | 59.63 | Not recorded | 6a016299dbc836b87d823180 |
| DES-Clustering | 59.5 | Not recorded | 6a016299dbc836b87d823180 |
| ICLT3Q | 50.5 | Not recorded | 6a016299dbc836b87d823180 |
| MolecularLlama | 36.9 | Not recorded | 6a016299dbc836b87d823180 |
| ChemformerLlama | 30.4 | Not recorded | 6a016299dbc836b87d823180 |
| ICLLlama | 20.3 | Not recorded | 6a016299dbc836b87d823180 |

### Theoretical Upper Bound

Accuracy (%): 100. Result ID: 6a01903f47f34ce924e34a8a.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/6a016299dbc836b87d823180.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: Not recorded. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### Claude-Sonnet-4.6

Accuracy (%): 96.53. Result ID: 6a01903f47f34ce924e34a97.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/6a016299dbc836b87d823180.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Category":"LLM-based Methods"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### Chemformer

Accuracy (%): 95.53. Result ID: 6a01903f47f34ce924e34a81.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/6a016299dbc836b87d823180.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Category":"Single-Tool Methods"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### BERT

Accuracy (%): 95.5. Result ID: 6a01903f47f34ce924e34a7d.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/6a016299dbc836b87d823180.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa65c31e209131cea0c4ed.md>)

[Implementation](<https://github.com/google-research/bert>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Category":"Single-Tool Methods"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### DRFP

Accuracy (%): 95.1. Result ID: 6a01903f47f34ce924e34a7e.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/6a016299dbc836b87d823180.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Category":"Single-Tool Methods"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### ToolEyes

Accuracy (%): 94.77. Result ID: 6a01903f47f34ce924e34a94.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/6a016299dbc836b87d823180.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa76001e209131cea6ad9f.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Category":"LLM-based Methods"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### Molecular

Accuracy (%): 93.27. Result ID: 6a01903f47f34ce924e34a80.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/6a016299dbc836b87d823180.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa3a9c1e209131ce8cc087.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Category":"Single-Tool Methods"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### HarderMoE

Accuracy (%): 92.97. Result ID: 6a01903f47f34ce924e34a93.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/6a016299dbc836b87d823180.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa72811e209131cea56d72.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Category":"Dynamic Methods"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### ARMOR

Accuracy (%): 91.67. Result ID: 6a01903f47f34ce924e34a98.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/6a016299dbc836b87d823180.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/6a016299dbc836b87d823180.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Category":"LLM-based Methods","Backbone":"T3Q-Qwen-14B"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### Weighted Voting

Accuracy (%): 91.2. Result ID: 6a01903f47f34ce924e34a8d.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/6a016299dbc836b87d823180.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Category":"Statistical Methods"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### PromptingLlama

Accuracy (%): 84.67. Result ID: 6a01903f47f34ce924e34a83.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/6a016299dbc836b87d823180.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Category":"Single-Tool Methods","Backbone":"Llama"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### DeepSeek-v4-flash

Accuracy (%): 84.67. Result ID: 6a01903f47f34ce924e34a96.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/6a016299dbc836b87d823180.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Category":"LLM-based Methods"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### KNORA-U

Accuracy (%): 83.37. Result ID: 6a01903f47f34ce924e34a92.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/6a016299dbc836b87d823180.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Category":"Dynamic Methods"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### Majority Voting

Accuracy (%): 83.23. Result ID: 6a01903f47f34ce924e34a8c.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/6a016299dbc836b87d823180.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Category":"Statistical Methods"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### KNORA-E

Accuracy (%): 83.23. Result ID: 6a01903f47f34ce924e34a91.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/6a016299dbc836b87d823180.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Category":"Dynamic Methods"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### Dora\_xgb

Accuracy (%): 79.6. Result ID: 6a01903f47f34ce924e34a7f.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/6a016299dbc836b87d823180.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Category":"Single-Tool Methods"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### DES-KNN

Accuracy (%): 75.03. Result ID: 6a01903f47f34ce924e34a8f.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/6a016299dbc836b87d823180.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Category":"Dynamic Methods"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### StaticSel

Accuracy (%): 66.37. Result ID: 6a01903f47f34ce924e34a8b.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/6a016299dbc836b87d823180.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Category":"Statistical Methods"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### Random Selection

Accuracy (%): 66.29. Result ID: 6a01903f47f34ce924e34a8e.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/6a016299dbc836b87d823180.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Category":"Statistical Methods"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### MolecularT3Q

Accuracy (%): 64.1. Result ID: 6a01903f47f34ce924e34a86.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/6a016299dbc836b87d823180.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa3a9c1e209131ce8cc087.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Category":"Single-Tool Methods","Backbone":"T3Q"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### GPT-5.4-mini

Accuracy (%): 64.03. Result ID: 6a01903f47f34ce924e34a95.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/6a016299dbc836b87d823180.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/695f39f053fdd5c361743ecb.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Category":"LLM-based Methods"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### PromptingT3Q

Accuracy (%): 61.83. Result ID: 6a01903f47f34ce924e34a82.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/6a016299dbc836b87d823180.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Category":"Single-Tool Methods","Backbone":"T3Q"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### ChemformerT3Q

Accuracy (%): 59.63. Result ID: 6a01903f47f34ce924e34a88.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/6a016299dbc836b87d823180.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Category":"Single-Tool Methods","Backbone":"T3Q"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### DES-Clustering

Accuracy (%): 59.5. Result ID: 6a01903f47f34ce924e34a90.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/6a016299dbc836b87d823180.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Category":"Dynamic Methods"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### ICLT3Q

Accuracy (%): 50.5. Result ID: 6a01903f47f34ce924e34a84.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/6a016299dbc836b87d823180.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Category":"Single-Tool Methods","Backbone":"T3Q"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### MolecularLlama

Accuracy (%): 36.9. Result ID: 6a01903f47f34ce924e34a87.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/6a016299dbc836b87d823180.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa3a9c1e209131ce8cc087.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Category":"Single-Tool Methods","Backbone":"Llama"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### ChemformerLlama

Accuracy (%): 30.4. Result ID: 6a01903f47f34ce924e34a89.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/6a016299dbc836b87d823180.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Category":"Single-Tool Methods","Backbone":"Llama"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### ICLLlama

Accuracy (%): 20.3. Result ID: 6a01903f47f34ce924e34a85.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/6a016299dbc836b87d823180.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Category":"Single-Tool Methods","Backbone":"Llama"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

Page 1 of 1. This is an index page, not the full collection.
