# Ranking fidelity evaluation on ImageNet L-inf RobustBench (test)

Source: [Ranking fidelity evaluation on ImageNet L-inf RobustBench (test)](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/ranking-fidelity-evaluation-on-imagenet-l-inf-robustbench-test>)

Collection index: [llms.txt](<https://www.sota2.com/research/llms.txt>)

Data updated: 2026-04-15T09:44:06.402Z

Evaluation of ranking fidelity for models tested on the ImageNet L-inf RobustBench test set, measured using Spearman rank correlation.

A research result applies to its stated dataset, split, metric and evaluation configuration. Compare like-for-like settings, preserve the metric's unit and direction, and distinguish paper-reported results from independent reproduction. The best result recorded here is not a claim of exhaustive, current global coverage.

| Scope | Recorded value |
| --- | --- |
| Task | Ranking fidelity evaluation |
| Dataset (including any stated split) | ImageNet L-inf RobustBench (test) |
| Metric | Spearman Correlation (ρ) |
| Unit | SCALAR |
| Direction | Higher is better |
| Results loaded | 3 of 3 |
| Coverage | All results currently returned for this benchmark |

Evaluation settings may differ between results. The original papers and recorded configurations are needed to establish comparability. A shared metric name alone does not establish an identical protocol.

## Metrics

- [Spearman Correlation (ρ)](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/ranking-fidelity-evaluation-on-imagenet-l-inf-robustbench-test.md?metric=Spearman%20Correlation%20(%CF%81)>): Higher is better; unit: SCALAR.

## Recorded results

| Method | Spearman Correlation (ρ) | Result date | Report paper |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| GF-Score | 1 | Not recorded | 69df1bbf7d0172140ec7bb16 |
| GF-Score | 0.9 | Not recorded | 69df1bbf7d0172140ec7bb16 |
| Original | 0.8 | Not recorded | 69df1bbf7d0172140ec7bb16 |

### GF-Score

Spearman Correlation (ρ): 1. Result ID: 69df5dd347f34ce924c882d3.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/69df1bbf7d0172140ec7bb16.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/69df1bbf7d0172140ec7bb16.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Calibration status":"Calibrated"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### GF-Score

Spearman Correlation (ρ): 0.9. Result ID: 69df5dd347f34ce924c882d2.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/69df1bbf7d0172140ec7bb16.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/69df1bbf7d0172140ec7bb16.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Calibration status":"Uncalibrated"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### Original

Spearman Correlation (ρ): 0.8. Result ID: 69df5dd347f34ce924c882d1.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/69df1bbf7d0172140ec7bb16.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa756d1e209131cea67d54.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Calibration status":"Uncalibrated"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

Page 1 of 1. This is an index page, not the full collection.