# Ranking fidelity evaluation on CIFAR-10 L2 RobustBench (test)

Source: [Ranking fidelity evaluation on CIFAR-10 L2 RobustBench (test)](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/ranking-fidelity-evaluation-on-cifar-10-l2-robustbench-test>)

Collection index: [llms.txt](<https://www.sota2.com/research/llms.txt>)

Data updated: 2026-04-15T09:44:06.382Z

Evaluation of ranking fidelity using Spearman correlation on the CIFAR-10 L2 RobustBench test set.

A research result applies to its stated dataset, split, metric and evaluation configuration. Compare like-for-like settings, preserve the metric's unit and direction, and distinguish paper-reported results from independent reproduction. The best result recorded here is not a claim of exhaustive, current global coverage.

| Scope | Recorded value |
| --- | --- |
| Task | Ranking fidelity evaluation |
| Dataset (including any stated split) | CIFAR-10 L2 RobustBench (test) |
| Metric | Spearman Rank Correlation |
| Unit | SCALAR |
| Direction | Higher is better |
| Results loaded | 4 of 4 |
| Coverage | All results currently returned for this benchmark |

Evaluation settings may differ between results. The original papers and recorded configurations are needed to establish comparability. A shared metric name alone does not establish an identical protocol.

## Metrics

- [Spearman Rank Correlation](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/ranking-fidelity-evaluation-on-cifar-10-l2-robustbench-test.md?metric=Spearman%20Rank%20Correlation>): Higher is better; unit: SCALAR.

## Recorded results

| Method | Spearman Rank Correlation | Result date | Report paper |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Original | 0.897 | Not recorded | 69df1bbf7d0172140ec7bb16 |
| GF-Score | 0.871 | Not recorded | 69df1bbf7d0172140ec7bb16 |
| Original | 0.662 | Not recorded | 69df1bbf7d0172140ec7bb16 |
| GF-Score | 0.662 | Not recorded | 69df1bbf7d0172140ec7bb16 |

### Original

Spearman Rank Correlation: 0.897. Result ID: 69df5dd347f34ce924c882ce.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/69df1bbf7d0172140ec7bb16.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa756d1e209131cea67d54.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Calibration status":"Calibrated"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### GF-Score

Spearman Rank Correlation: 0.871. Result ID: 69df5dd347f34ce924c882d0.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/69df1bbf7d0172140ec7bb16.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/69df1bbf7d0172140ec7bb16.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Calibration status":"Calibrated"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### Original

Spearman Rank Correlation: 0.662. Result ID: 69df5dd347f34ce924c882cd.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/69df1bbf7d0172140ec7bb16.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa756d1e209131cea67d54.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Calibration status":"Uncalibrated"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### GF-Score

Spearman Rank Correlation: 0.662. Result ID: 69df5dd347f34ce924c882cf.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/69df1bbf7d0172140ec7bb16.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/69df1bbf7d0172140ec7bb16.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Calibration status":"Uncalibrated"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

Page 1 of 1. This is an index page, not the full collection.