# Ranking correlation with full dataset evaluation on DNLI

Source: [Ranking correlation with full dataset evaluation on DNLI](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/ranking-correlation-with-full-dataset-evaluation-on-dnli>)

Collection index: [llms.txt](<https://www.sota2.com/research/llms.txt>)

Data updated: 2026-02-26T05:47:49.174Z

Evaluation of model ranking correlation performance using the DNLI dataset, measured via Kendall correlation across the full dataset evaluation.

A research result applies to its stated dataset, split, metric and evaluation configuration. Compare like-for-like settings, preserve the metric's unit and direction, and distinguish paper-reported results from independent reproduction. The best result recorded here is not a claim of exhaustive, current global coverage.

| Scope | Recorded value |
| --- | --- |
| Task | Ranking correlation with full dataset evaluation |
| Dataset (including any stated split) | DNLI |
| Metric | Kendall Correlation |
| Unit | SCALAR |
| Direction | Higher is better |
| Results loaded | 10 of 10 |
| Coverage | All results currently returned for this benchmark |

Evaluation settings may differ between results. The original papers and recorded configurations are needed to establish comparability. A shared metric name alone does not establish an identical protocol.

## Metrics

- [Kendall Correlation](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/ranking-correlation-with-full-dataset-evaluation-on-dnli.md?metric=Kendall%20Correlation>): Higher is better; unit: SCALAR.

## Recorded results

| Method | Kendall Correlation | Result date | Report paper |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| ILDAE | 0.95 | Not recorded | 68fa6bf21e209131cea311ae |
| ILDAE | 0.93 | Not recorded | 68fa6bf21e209131cea311ae |
| ILDAE | 0.89 | Not recorded | 68fa6bf21e209131cea311ae |
| ILDAE | 0.82 | Not recorded | 68fa6bf21e209131cea311ae |
| ILDAE | 0.76 | Not recorded | 68fa6bf21e209131cea311ae |
| Heuristic | 0.71 | Not recorded | 68fa6bf21e209131cea311ae |
| Random | 0.68 | Not recorded | 68fa6bf21e209131cea311ae |
| Heuristic | 0.59 | Not recorded | 68fa6bf21e209131cea311ae |
| Random | 0.58 | Not recorded | 68fa6bf21e209131cea311ae |
| ILDAE | 0.58 | Not recorded | 68fa6bf21e209131cea311ae |

### ILDAE

Kendall Correlation: 0.95. Result ID: 698eacd9ffc3901de09faefd.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa6bf21e209131cea311ae.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa6bf21e209131cea311ae.md>)

[Implementation](<https://github.com/nrjvarshney/ILDAE>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Percentage of instances":"20%"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### ILDAE

Kendall Correlation: 0.93. Result ID: 698eacd9ffc3901de09faefc.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa6bf21e209131cea311ae.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa6bf21e209131cea311ae.md>)

[Implementation](<https://github.com/nrjvarshney/ILDAE>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Percentage of instances":"10%"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### ILDAE

Kendall Correlation: 0.89. Result ID: 698eacd9ffc3901de09faefb.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa6bf21e209131cea311ae.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa6bf21e209131cea311ae.md>)

[Implementation](<https://github.com/nrjvarshney/ILDAE>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Percentage of instances":"5%"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### ILDAE

Kendall Correlation: 0.82. Result ID: 698eacd9ffc3901de09faefa.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa6bf21e209131cea311ae.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa6bf21e209131cea311ae.md>)

[Implementation](<https://github.com/nrjvarshney/ILDAE>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Percentage of instances":"2%"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### ILDAE

Kendall Correlation: 0.76. Result ID: 698eacd9ffc3901de09faef9.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa6bf21e209131cea311ae.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa6bf21e209131cea311ae.md>)

[Implementation](<https://github.com/nrjvarshney/ILDAE>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Percentage of instances":"1%"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### Heuristic

Kendall Correlation: 0.71. Result ID: 698eacd9ffc3901de09faef8.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa6bf21e209131cea311ae.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Percentage of instances":"1%"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### Random

Kendall Correlation: 0.68. Result ID: 698eacd9ffc3901de09faef7.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa6bf21e209131cea311ae.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Percentage of instances":"1%"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### Heuristic

Kendall Correlation: 0.59. Result ID: 698eacd9ffc3901de09faef5.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa6bf21e209131cea311ae.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Percentage of instances":"0.5%"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### Random

Kendall Correlation: 0.58. Result ID: 698eacd9ffc3901de09faef4.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa6bf21e209131cea311ae.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Percentage of instances":"0.5%"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### ILDAE

Kendall Correlation: 0.58. Result ID: 698eacd9ffc3901de09faef6.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa6bf21e209131cea311ae.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa6bf21e209131cea311ae.md>)

[Implementation](<https://github.com/nrjvarshney/ILDAE>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Percentage of instances":"0.5%"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

Page 1 of 1. This is an index page, not the full collection.