# Question Answering on TriviaQA (EM(%), Lat.(ms)) Source: [Question Answering on TriviaQA (EM(%), Lat.(ms))]() Collection index: [llms.txt]() Data updated: 2026-05-08T10:42:46.604Z Evaluation of Question Answering performance on the TriviaQA dataset, reporting Exact Match accuracy (as a percentage) and inference latency. A research result applies to its stated dataset, split, metric and evaluation configuration. Compare like-for-like settings, preserve the metric's unit and direction, and distinguish paper-reported results from independent reproduction. The best result recorded here is not a claim of exhaustive, current global coverage. | Scope | Recorded value | | --- | --- | | Task | Question Answering | | Dataset (including any stated split) | TriviaQA | | Metric | EM (%) | | Unit | PERCENT | | Direction | Higher is better | | Results loaded | 27 of 27 | | Coverage | All results currently returned for this benchmark | Evaluation settings may differ between results. The original papers and recorded configurations are needed to establish comparability. A shared metric name alone does not establish an identical protocol. ## Metrics - [EM (%)](): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT. - [Latency (ms)](): Lower is better; unit: TIME. ## Recorded results | Method | EM (%) | Result date | Report paper | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | AutoRefine△ | 65.3 | Not recorded | 69fd6e205497b3b670c894ce | | AutoRefine△ | 64.73 | Not recorded | 69fd6e205497b3b670c894ce | | Search-R1♢ | 64.59 | Not recorded | 69fd6e205497b3b670c894ce | | AutoRefine△ | 64.32 | Not recorded | 69fd6e205497b3b670c894ce | | Search-R1♢ | 63.16 | Not recorded | 69fd6e205497b3b670c894ce | | AutoRefine△ | 63.09 | Not recorded | 69fd6e205497b3b670c894ce | | Search-R1♢ | 62.8 | Not recorded | 69fd6e205497b3b670c894ce | | AutoRefine△ | 62.53 | Not recorded | 69fd6e205497b3b670c894ce | | LatentRAG△ | 62.32 | Not recorded | 69fd6e205497b3b670c894ce | | Search-R1♢ | 61.7 | Not recorded | 69fd6e205497b3b670c894ce | | LatentRAG△ | 61.54 | Not recorded | 69fd6e205497b3b670c894ce | | LatentRAG♢ | 61.3 | Not recorded | 69fd6e205497b3b670c894ce | | LatentRAG♢ | 61.25 | Not recorded | 69fd6e205497b3b670c894ce | | Search-R1♢ | 61.04 | Not recorded | 69fd6e205497b3b670c894ce | | LatentRAG△ | 60.98 | Not recorded | 69fd6e205497b3b670c894ce | | LatentRAG♢ | 60.4 | Not recorded | 69fd6e205497b3b670c894ce | | LatentRAG△ | 60.18 | Not recorded | 69fd6e205497b3b670c894ce | | LatentRAG♢ | 59.85 | Not recorded | 69fd6e205497b3b670c894ce | | LatentRAG△ | 58.83 | Not recorded | 69fd6e205497b3b670c894ce | | LatentRAG♢ | 58.56 | Not recorded | 69fd6e205497b3b670c894ce | | Iter-RetGen | 56.91 | Not recorded | 69fd6e205497b3b670c894ce | | R1-Searcher | 56.1 | Not recorded | 69fd6e205497b3b670c894ce | | DeepRAG | 55.48 | Not recorded | 69fd6e205497b3b670c894ce | | ZeroSearch | 54.67 | Not recorded | 69fd6e205497b3b670c894ce | | Naive RAG | 53.32 | Not recorded | 69fd6e205497b3b670c894ce | | Search-o1 | 44.53 | Not recorded | 69fd6e205497b3b670c894ce | | Direct Infer | 42.48 | Not recorded | 69fd6e205497b3b670c894ce | ### AutoRefine△ EM (%): 65.3. Result ID: 69fdbe1d47f34ce924e16e27. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Retrieval Model":"e5-base-v2"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### AutoRefine△ EM (%): 64.73. Result ID: 69fdbe1d47f34ce924e16e2b. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Retrieval Model":"jina-embeddings-v5-text-nano"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### Search-R1♢ EM (%): 64.59. Result ID: 69fdbe1d47f34ce924e16e25. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Retrieval Model":"e5-base-v2"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### AutoRefine△ EM (%): 64.32. Result ID: 69fdbe1d47f34ce924e16e2f. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Retrieval Model":"harrier-oss-v1-270m"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### Search-R1♢ EM (%): 63.16. Result ID: 69fdbe1d47f34ce924e16e29. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Retrieval Model":"jina-embeddings-v5-text-nano"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### AutoRefine△ EM (%): 63.09. Result ID: 69fdbe1d47f34ce924e16e23. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Retrieval Model":"Qwen3-Embedding-0.6B"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### Search-R1♢ EM (%): 62.8. Result ID: 69fdbe1d47f34ce924e16e2d. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Retrieval Model":"harrier-oss-v1-270m"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### AutoRefine△ EM (%): 62.53. Result ID: 69fdbe1d47f34ce924e16e33. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Retrieval Model":"F2LLM-v2-330M"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### LatentRAG△ EM (%): 62.32. Result ID: 69fdbe1d47f34ce924e16e28. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Retrieval Model":"e5-base-v2"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### Search-R1♢ EM (%): 61.7. Result ID: 69fdbe1d47f34ce924e16e21. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Retrieval Model":"Qwen3-Embedding-0.6B"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### LatentRAG△ EM (%): 61.54. Result ID: 69fdbe1d47f34ce924e16e2c. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Retrieval Model":"jina-embeddings-v5-text-nano"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### LatentRAG♢ EM (%): 61.3. Result ID: 69fdbe1d47f34ce924e16e26. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Retrieval Model":"e5-base-v2"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### LatentRAG♢ EM (%): 61.25. Result ID: 69fdbe1d47f34ce924e16e2a. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Retrieval Model":"jina-embeddings-v5-text-nano"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### Search-R1♢ EM (%): 61.04. Result ID: 69fdbe1d47f34ce924e16e31. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Retrieval Model":"F2LLM-v2-330M"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### LatentRAG△ EM (%): 60.98. Result ID: 69fdbe1d47f34ce924e16e30. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Retrieval Model":"harrier-oss-v1-270m"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### LatentRAG♢ EM (%): 60.4. Result ID: 69fdbe1d47f34ce924e16e2e. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Retrieval Model":"harrier-oss-v1-270m"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### LatentRAG△ EM (%): 60.18. Result ID: 69fdbe1d47f34ce924e16e24. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Retrieval Model":"Qwen3-Embedding-0.6B"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### LatentRAG♢ EM (%): 59.85. Result ID: 69fdbe1d47f34ce924e16e22. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Retrieval Model":"Qwen3-Embedding-0.6B"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### LatentRAG△ EM (%): 58.83. Result ID: 69fdbe1d47f34ce924e16e34. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Retrieval Model":"F2LLM-v2-330M"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### LatentRAG♢ EM (%): 58.56. Result ID: 69fdbe1d47f34ce924e16e32. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Retrieval Model":"F2LLM-v2-330M"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### Iter-RetGen EM (%): 56.91. Result ID: 69fdbe1d47f34ce924e16e1c. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Retrieval Model":"Qwen3-Embedding-0.6B"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### R1-Searcher EM (%): 56.1. Result ID: 69fdbe1d47f34ce924e16e1e. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Retrieval Model":"Qwen3-Embedding-0.6B"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### DeepRAG EM (%): 55.48. Result ID: 69fdbe1d47f34ce924e16e20. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Retrieval Model":"Qwen3-Embedding-0.6B"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### ZeroSearch EM (%): 54.67. Result ID: 69fdbe1d47f34ce924e16e1f. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Retrieval Model":"Qwen3-Embedding-0.6B"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### Naive RAG EM (%): 53.32. Result ID: 69fdbe1d47f34ce924e16e1b. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() [Implementation]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Retrieval Model":"Qwen3-Embedding-0.6B"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### Search-o1 EM (%): 44.53. Result ID: 69fdbe1d47f34ce924e16e1d. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() [Implementation]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Retrieval Model":"Qwen3-Embedding-0.6B"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### Direct Infer EM (%): 42.48. Result ID: 69fdbe1d47f34ce924e16e1a. [Reporting paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Retrieval Model":"N/A"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. Page 1 of 1. This is an index page, not the full collection.