# Proof of Liabilities Evaluation on Synthetic Proof of Liabilities (PoL) Environment

Source: [Proof of Liabilities Evaluation on Synthetic Proof of Liabilities (PoL) Environment](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/proof-of-liabilities-evaluation-on-synthetic-proof-of-liabilities-pol-environment>)

Collection index: [llms.txt](<https://www.sota2.com/research/llms.txt>)

Data updated: 2026-03-16T10:11:14.656Z

Evaluation of a Proof of Liabilities (PoL) system's security properties (e.g., non-repudiation, verification complexity) and performance (updates/s) within a synthetic testing environment.

A research result applies to its stated dataset, split, metric and evaluation configuration. Compare like-for-like settings, preserve the metric's unit and direction, and distinguish paper-reported results from independent reproduction. The best result recorded here is not a claim of exhaustive, current global coverage.

| Scope | Recorded value |
| --- | --- |
| Task | Proof of Liabilities Evaluation |
| Dataset (including any stated split) | Synthetic Proof of Liabilities (PoL) Environment |
| Metric | Throughput (Updates/s) |
| Unit | SCALAR |
| Direction | Higher is better |
| Results loaded | 4 of 4 |
| Coverage | All results currently returned for this benchmark |

Evaluation settings may differ between results. The original papers and recorded configurations are needed to establish comparability. A shared metric name alone does not establish an identical protocol.

## Metrics

- [Throughput (Updates/s)](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/proof-of-liabilities-evaluation-on-synthetic-proof-of-liabilities-pol-environment.md?metric=Throughput%20(Updates%2Fs)>): Higher is better; unit: SCALAR.

- [OTB Non-Repudiable Attacks](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/proof-of-liabilities-evaluation-on-synthetic-proof-of-liabilities-pol-environment.md?metric=OTB%20Non-Repudiable%20Attacks>): Lower is better; unit: SCALAR.

- [Preemptive User Checks Count](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/proof-of-liabilities-evaluation-on-synthetic-proof-of-liabilities-pol-environment.md?metric=Preemptive%20User%20Checks%20Count>): Higher is better; unit: SCALAR.

- [Auditor Global Verification Complexity](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/proof-of-liabilities-evaluation-on-synthetic-proof-of-liabilities-pol-environment.md?metric=Auditor%20Global%20Verification%20Complexity>): Lower is better; unit: SCALAR.

- [Per-User Inclusion Verification Complexity](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/proof-of-liabilities-evaluation-on-synthetic-proof-of-liabilities-pol-environment.md?metric=Per-User%20Inclusion%20Verification%20Complexity>): Lower is better; unit: SCALAR.

## Recorded results

| Method | Throughput (Updates/s) | Result date | Report paper |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| PPoL | 369 | Not recorded | 69b78e770636e5bf4afbdb92 |
| Succinct PoLs | 145 | Not recorded | 69b78e770636e5bf4afbdb92 |
| Notus | 3.69 | Not recorded | 69b78e770636e5bf4afbdb92 |
| Standard PoLs | 0.267 | Not recorded | 69b78e770636e5bf4afbdb92 |

### PPoL

Throughput (Updates/s): 369. Result ID: 69b7d74047f34ce924a01c06.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/69b78e770636e5bf4afbdb92.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/69b78e770636e5bf4afbdb92.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Number of users (n)":"2^16"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### Succinct PoLs

Throughput (Updates/s): 145. Result ID: 69b7d74047f34ce924a01c04.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/69b78e770636e5bf4afbdb92.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Implementation":"Xiezhi","Number of users (n)":"2^16"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### Notus

Throughput (Updates/s): 3.69. Result ID: 69b7d74047f34ce924a01c05.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/69b78e770636e5bf4afbdb92.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Number of users (n)":"2^16"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### Standard PoLs

Throughput (Updates/s): 0.267. Result ID: 69b7d74047f34ce924a01c03.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/69b78e770636e5bf4afbdb92.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Implementation":"DAPOL+","Number of users (n)":"2^16"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

Page 1 of 1. This is an index page, not the full collection.