# Post-purification Robustness on Tiny-ImageNet 5% v1 (test)

Source: [Post-purification Robustness on Tiny-ImageNet 5% v1 (test)](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/post-purification-robustness-on-tiny-imagenet-5-percent-v1-test>)

Collection index: [llms.txt](<https://www.sota2.com/research/llms.txt>)

Data updated: 2026-02-26T05:37:58.617Z

Evaluation of model robustness against specific purification defenses (BadNet, Blended, SSBA) on the test split of the Tiny-ImageNet 5% v1 dataset, reporting corresponding Clean Accuracy (C-Acc) and Attack Success Rate (ASR).

A research result applies to its stated dataset, split, metric and evaluation configuration. Compare like-for-like settings, preserve the metric's unit and direction, and distinguish paper-reported results from independent reproduction. The best result recorded here is not a claim of exhaustive, current global coverage.

| Scope | Recorded value |
| --- | --- |
| Task | Post-purification robustness |
| Dataset (including any stated split) | Tiny-ImageNet 5% v1 (test) |
| Metric | C-Acc (BadNet) |
| Unit | PERCENT |
| Direction | Higher is better |
| Results loaded | 5 of 5 |
| Coverage | All results currently returned for this benchmark |

Evaluation settings may differ between results. The original papers and recorded configurations are needed to establish comparability. A shared metric name alone does not establish an identical protocol.

## Metrics

- [C-Acc (BadNet)](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/post-purification-robustness-on-tiny-imagenet-5-percent-v1-test.md?metric=C-Acc%20(BadNet)>): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT.

- [ASR (BadNet)](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/post-purification-robustness-on-tiny-imagenet-5-percent-v1-test.md?metric=ASR%20(BadNet)>): Lower is better; unit: PERCENT.

- [C-Acc (Blended)](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/post-purification-robustness-on-tiny-imagenet-5-percent-v1-test.md?metric=C-Acc%20(Blended)>): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT.

- [ASR (Blended)](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/post-purification-robustness-on-tiny-imagenet-5-percent-v1-test.md?metric=ASR%20(Blended)>): Lower is better; unit: PERCENT.

- [C-Acc (SSBA)](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/post-purification-robustness-on-tiny-imagenet-5-percent-v1-test.md?metric=C-Acc%20(SSBA)>): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT.

- [ASR (SSBA)](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/post-purification-robustness-on-tiny-imagenet-5-percent-v1-test.md?metric=ASR%20(SSBA)>): Lower is better; unit: PERCENT.

- [Avg C-Acc](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/post-purification-robustness-on-tiny-imagenet-5-percent-v1-test.md?metric=Avg%20C-Acc>): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT.

- [Avg ASR](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/post-purification-robustness-on-tiny-imagenet-5-percent-v1-test.md?metric=Avg%20ASR>): Lower is better; unit: PERCENT.

## Recorded results

| Method | C-Acc (BadNet) | Result date | Report paper |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| O-Backdoor | 72.6 | Not recorded | 68fa753e1e209131cea66bbb |
| EP | 70.9 | Not recorded | 68fa753e1e209131cea66bbb |
| EP | 70.59 | Not recorded | 68fa753e1e209131cea66bbb |
| PAM | 68.97 | Not recorded | 68fa753e1e209131cea66bbb |
| PAM | 68.78 | Not recorded | 68fa753e1e209131cea66bbb |

### O-Backdoor

C-Acc (BadNet): 72.6. Result ID: 699384653a6c31484916861e.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa753e1e209131cea66bbb.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Evaluation Mode":"O-Backdoor"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### EP

C-Acc (BadNet): 70.9. Result ID: 699384653a6c31484916861f.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa753e1e209131cea66bbb.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Evaluation Mode":"O-Robustness"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### EP

C-Acc (BadNet): 70.59. Result ID: 699384653a6c314849168620.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa753e1e209131cea66bbb.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Evaluation Mode":"P-Robustness"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### PAM

C-Acc (BadNet): 68.97. Result ID: 699384653a6c314849168622.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa753e1e209131cea66bbb.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa753e1e209131cea66bbb.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Evaluation Mode":"P-Robustness"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### PAM

C-Acc (BadNet): 68.78. Result ID: 699384653a6c314849168621.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa753e1e209131cea66bbb.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa753e1e209131cea66bbb.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Evaluation Mode":"O-Robustness"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

Page 1 of 1. This is an index page, not the full collection.