# Portrait Drawing Generation on APDrawings (test)

Source: [Portrait Drawing Generation on APDrawings (test)](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/portrait-drawing-generation-on-apdrawings-test>)

Collection index: [llms.txt](<https://www.sota2.com/research/llms.txt>)

Data updated: 2026-02-26T05:58:56.267Z

Evaluation of models generating portrait drawings using the APDrawings dataset (test split), typically assessed using human preference scores.

A research result applies to its stated dataset, split, metric and evaluation configuration. Compare like-for-like settings, preserve the metric's unit and direction, and distinguish paper-reported results from independent reproduction. The best result recorded here is not a claim of exhaustive, current global coverage.

| Scope | Recorded value |
| --- | --- |
| Task | Portrait Drawing Generation |
| Dataset (including any stated split) | APDrawings (test) |
| Metric | Preference Score |
| Unit | PERCENT |
| Direction | Higher is better |
| Results loaded | 3 of 3 |
| Coverage | All results currently returned for this benchmark |

Evaluation settings may differ between results. The original papers and recorded configurations are needed to establish comparability. A shared metric name alone does not establish an identical protocol.

## Metrics

- [Preference Score](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/portrait-drawing-generation-on-apdrawings-test.md?metric=Preference%20Score>): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT.

## Recorded results

| Method | Preference Score | Result date | Report paper |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Informative Drawings | 94.8 | Not recorded | 68fa6c1e1e209131cea32577 |
| Informative Drawings | 60.1 | Not recorded | 68fa6c1e1e209131cea32577 |
| Informative Drawings | 36.7 | Not recorded | 68fa6c1e1e209131cea32577 |

### Informative Drawings

Preference Score: 94.8. Result ID: 698ee076ffc3901de0a2935c.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa6c1e1e209131cea32577.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa6c1e1e209131cea32577.md>)

[Implementation](<http://carolineec.github.io/informative_drawings>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Comparison Baseline":"UPDG","Study Scenario":"Case 2"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### Informative Drawings

Preference Score: 60.1. Result ID: 698ee076ffc3901de0a2935b.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa6c1e1e209131cea32577.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa6c1e1e209131cea32577.md>)

[Implementation](<http://carolineec.github.io/informative_drawings>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Comparison Baseline":"APDrawingGAN","Study Scenario":"Case 2"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### Informative Drawings

Preference Score: 36.7. Result ID: 698ee076ffc3901de0a29359.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa6c1e1e209131cea32577.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa6c1e1e209131cea32577.md>)

[Implementation](<http://carolineec.github.io/informative_drawings>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Comparison Baseline":"APDrawingGAN","Study Scenario":"Case 1"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

Page 1 of 1. This is an index page, not the full collection.