# Peer Review Feedback Generation on ICLR papers

Source: [Peer Review Feedback Generation on ICLR papers](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/peer-review-feedback-generation-on-iclr-papers>)

Collection index: [llms.txt](<https://www.sota2.com/research/llms.txt>)

Data updated: 2026-04-15T07:42:16.041Z

Evaluation of model performance on generating peer review feedback for ICLR papers, measured by combined success rates and validity rates.

A research result applies to its stated dataset, split, metric and evaluation configuration. Compare like-for-like settings, preserve the metric's unit and direction, and distinguish paper-reported results from independent reproduction. The best result recorded here is not a claim of exhaustive, current global coverage.

| Scope | Recorded value |
| --- | --- |
| Task | Peer Review Feedback Generation |
| Dataset (including any stated split) | ICLR papers |
| Metric | Combined Success Rate |
| Unit | PERCENT |
| Direction | Higher is better |
| Results loaded | 6 of 6 |
| Coverage | All results currently returned for this benchmark |

Evaluation settings may differ between results. The original papers and recorded configurations are needed to establish comparability. A shared metric name alone does not establish an identical protocol.

## Metrics

- [Combined Success Rate](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/peer-review-feedback-generation-on-iclr-papers.md?metric=Combined%20Success%20Rate>): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT.

- [Combined Success Confidence Interval (CI)](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/peer-review-feedback-generation-on-iclr-papers.md?metric=Combined%20Success%20Confidence%20Interval%20(CI)>): Lower is better; unit: PERCENT.

- [Validity Only Rate](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/peer-review-feedback-generation-on-iclr-papers.md?metric=Validity%20Only%20Rate>): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT.

- [Validity Only Confidence Interval (CI)](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/peer-review-feedback-generation-on-iclr-papers.md?metric=Validity%20Only%20Confidence%20Interval%20(CI)>): Lower is better; unit: PERCENT.

- [Author Action Only Rate](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/peer-review-feedback-generation-on-iclr-papers.md?metric=Author%20Action%20Only%20Rate>): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT.

- [Author Action Only Confidence Interval (CI)](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/peer-review-feedback-generation-on-iclr-papers.md?metric=Author%20Action%20Only%20Confidence%20Interval%20(CI)>): Lower is better; unit: PERCENT.

## Recorded results

| Method | Combined Success Rate | Result date | Report paper |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| GPT-5.2 | 45.8 | Not recorded | 69df1b967d0172140ec7b901 |
| Gemini-3-flash | 37.9 | Not recorded | 69df1b967d0172140ec7b901 |
| GOODPOINT-DPO | 14.7 | Not recorded | 69df1b967d0172140ec7b901 |
| GOODPOINT-SFT | 9.2 | Not recorded | 69df1b967d0172140ec7b901 |
| Qwen3-8b (Base) | 8 | Not recorded | 69df1b967d0172140ec7b901 |
| Llama3.1-8b-Instruct | 1.8 | Not recorded | 69df1b967d0172140ec7b901 |

### GPT-5.2

Combined Success Rate: 45.8. Result ID: 69df3fea47f34ce924c7b62d.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/69df1b967d0172140ec7b901.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Bootstrap iterations (B)":"1000","Feedback per paper":"5"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### Gemini-3-flash

Combined Success Rate: 37.9. Result ID: 69df3fea47f34ce924c7b62c.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/69df1b967d0172140ec7b901.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Bootstrap iterations (B)":"1000","Feedback per paper":"5"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### GOODPOINT-DPO

Combined Success Rate: 14.7. Result ID: 69df3fea47f34ce924c7b630.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/69df1b967d0172140ec7b901.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/69df1b967d0172140ec7b901.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Training Protocol":"DPO","Bootstrap iterations (B)":"1000","Feedback per paper":"5"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### GOODPOINT-SFT

Combined Success Rate: 9.2. Result ID: 69df3fea47f34ce924c7b631.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/69df1b967d0172140ec7b901.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/69df1b967d0172140ec7b901.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Training Protocol":"SFT","Bootstrap iterations (B)":"1000","Feedback per paper":"5"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### Qwen3-8b (Base)

Combined Success Rate: 8. Result ID: 69df3fea47f34ce924c7b62f.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/69df1b967d0172140ec7b901.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Model Scale":"8b","Training Protocol":"Base","Bootstrap iterations (B)":"1000","Feedback per paper":"5"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### Llama3.1-8b-Instruct

Combined Success Rate: 1.8. Result ID: 69df3fea47f34ce924c7b62e.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/69df1b967d0172140ec7b901.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Model Scale":"8b","Training Protocol":"Instruct","Bootstrap iterations (B)":"1000","Feedback per paper":"5"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

Page 1 of 1. This is an index page, not the full collection.
