# Patient Level Fracture Recognition on Private Dataset

Source: [Patient Level Fracture Recognition on Private Dataset](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/patient-level-fracture-recognition-on-private-dataset>)

Collection index: [llms.txt](<https://www.sota2.com/research/llms.txt>)

Data updated: 2026-02-26T05:31:32.496Z

Evaluation of model performance for recognizing patient-level fractures using the Private Dataset, reporting Accuracy, ROC-AUC, and F1 Score.

A research result applies to its stated dataset, split, metric and evaluation configuration. Compare like-for-like settings, preserve the metric's unit and direction, and distinguish paper-reported results from independent reproduction. The best result recorded here is not a claim of exhaustive, current global coverage.

| Scope | Recorded value |
| --- | --- |
| Task | Patient Level Fracture Recognition |
| Dataset (including any stated split) | Private Dataset |
| Metric | Accuracy |
| Unit | PERCENT |
| Direction | Higher is better |
| Results loaded | 4 of 4 |
| Coverage | All results currently returned for this benchmark |

Evaluation settings may differ between results. The original papers and recorded configurations are needed to establish comparability. A shared metric name alone does not establish an identical protocol.

## Metrics

- [Accuracy](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/patient-level-fracture-recognition-on-private-dataset.md?metric=Accuracy>): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT.

- [ROC-AUC](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/patient-level-fracture-recognition-on-private-dataset.md?metric=ROC-AUC>): Higher is better; unit: SCALAR.

- [F1 Score](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/patient-level-fracture-recognition-on-private-dataset.md?metric=F1%20Score>): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT.

## Recorded results

| Method | Accuracy | Result date | Report paper |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Tomita et al. | 0.892 | Not recorded | 6971af3ae25ad2fa9d1edc13 |
| Bhavya et al. | 0.83 | Not recorded | 6971af3ae25ad2fa9d1edc13 |
| Salehinejad et al. | 0.7092 | Not recorded | 6971af3ae25ad2fa9d1edc13 |

### Tomita et al.

Accuracy: 0.892. Result ID: 69979d2f5698665ec4f3168a.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/6971af3ae25ad2fa9d1edc13.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Test Set Size":"129 Patients"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### Bhavya et al.

Accuracy: 0.83. Result ID: 69979d2f5698665ec4f31688.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/6971af3ae25ad2fa9d1edc13.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Test Set Size":"14 Patients","Major Drawback":"Very small test set"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### Salehinejad et al.

Accuracy: 0.7092. Result ID: 69979d2f5698665ec4f3168b.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/6971af3ae25ad2fa9d1edc13.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa693b1e209131cea21024.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Test Set Size":"208 Patients"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

Page 1 of 1. This is an index page, not the full collection.
