# Pain Intensity Estimation on Dementia Source: [Pain Intensity Estimation on Dementia]() Collection index: [llms.txt]() Data updated: 2026-02-26T05:57:43.112Z Evaluation of Pain Intensity Estimation performance on the Dementia dataset, measured using correlation coefficients. A research result applies to its stated dataset, split, metric and evaluation configuration. Compare like-for-like settings, preserve the metric's unit and direction, and distinguish paper-reported results from independent reproduction. The best result recorded here is not a claim of exhaustive, current global coverage. | Scope | Recorded value | | --- | --- | | Task | Pain Intensity Estimation | | Dataset (including any stated split) | Dementia | | Metric | Pearson Correlation Coefficient | | Unit | SCALAR | | Direction | Higher is better | | Results loaded | 32 of 32 | | Coverage | All results currently returned for this benchmark | Evaluation settings may differ between results. The original papers and recorded configurations are needed to establish comparability. A shared metric name alone does not establish an identical protocol. ## Metrics - [Pearson Correlation Coefficient](): Higher is better; unit: SCALAR. ## Recorded results | Method | Pearson Correlation Coefficient | Result date | Report paper | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Second rater | 0.97 | Not recorded | 68fa690c1e209131cea1fbf9 | | Second rater | 0.95 | Not recorded | 68fa690c1e209131cea1fbf9 | | Second rater | 0.93 | Not recorded | 68fa690c1e209131cea1fbf9 | | Second rater | 0.91 | Not recorded | 68fa690c1e209131cea1fbf9 | | pairwise comparative inference method w/ contrastive training | 0.82 | Not recorded | 68fa690c1e209131cea1fbf9 | | pairwise comparative inference method | 0.79 | Not recorded | 68fa690c1e209131cea1fbf9 | | pairwise comparative inference method w/ contrastive training | 0.69 | Not recorded | 68fa690c1e209131cea1fbf9 | | AFAR | 0.6 | Not recorded | 68fa690c1e209131cea1fbf9 | | AFAR (mean subtracted) | 0.58 | Not recorded | 68fa690c1e209131cea1fbf9 | | pairwise comparative inference method | 0.58 | Not recorded | 68fa690c1e209131cea1fbf9 | | pairwise comparative inference method w/ contrastive training | 0.57 | Not recorded | 68fa690c1e209131cea1fbf9 | | AFAR (mean subtracted) | 0.53 | Not recorded | 68fa690c1e209131cea1fbf9 | | AFAR | 0.51 | Not recorded | 68fa690c1e209131cea1fbf9 | | pairwise comparative inference method w/ contrastive training | 0.48 | Not recorded | 68fa690c1e209131cea1fbf9 | | pairwise comparative inference method | 0.47 | Not recorded | 68fa690c1e209131cea1fbf9 | | OpenFace | 0.42 | Not recorded | 68fa690c1e209131cea1fbf9 | | AFAR (mean subtracted) | 0.42 | Not recorded | 68fa690c1e209131cea1fbf9 | | pairwise comparative inference method | 0.42 | Not recorded | 68fa690c1e209131cea1fbf9 | | AFAR | 0.4 | Not recorded | 68fa690c1e209131cea1fbf9 | | SVR with DCT features | 0.39 | Not recorded | 68fa690c1e209131cea1fbf9 | | AFAR (mean subtracted) | 0.33 | Not recorded | 68fa690c1e209131cea1fbf9 | | AFAR | 0.31 | Not recorded | 68fa690c1e209131cea1fbf9 | | VGG16+LSTM | 0.29 | Not recorded | 68fa690c1e209131cea1fbf9 | | SVR with DCT features | 0.28 | Not recorded | 68fa690c1e209131cea1fbf9 | | OpenFace | 0.27 | Not recorded | 68fa690c1e209131cea1fbf9 | | VGG16+LSTM | 0.27 | Not recorded | 68fa690c1e209131cea1fbf9 | | VGG16+LSTM | 0.24 | Not recorded | 68fa690c1e209131cea1fbf9 | | VGG16+LSTM | 0.23 | Not recorded | 68fa690c1e209131cea1fbf9 | | SVR with DCT features | 0.22 | Not recorded | 68fa690c1e209131cea1fbf9 | | OpenFace | 0.21 | Not recorded | 68fa690c1e209131cea1fbf9 | | OpenFace | 0.18 | Not recorded | 68fa690c1e209131cea1fbf9 | | SVR with DCT features | 0.17 | Not recorded | 68fa690c1e209131cea1fbf9 | ### Second rater Pearson Correlation Coefficient: 0.97. Result ID: 698d949c8b517eb433227ce2. [Reporting paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Window Length":"20sec"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### Second rater Pearson Correlation Coefficient: 0.95. Result ID: 698d949c8b517eb433227ce1. [Reporting paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Window Length":"5sec"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### Second rater Pearson Correlation Coefficient: 0.93. Result ID: 698d949c8b517eb433227ce0. [Reporting paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Window Length":"1sec"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### Second rater Pearson Correlation Coefficient: 0.91. Result ID: 698d949c8b517eb433227cdf. [Reporting paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Window Length":"frame"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### pairwise comparative inference method w/ contrastive training Pearson Correlation Coefficient: 0.82. Result ID: 698d949c8b517eb433227cde. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() [Implementation]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Window Length":"20sec"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### pairwise comparative inference method Pearson Correlation Coefficient: 0.79. Result ID: 698d949c8b517eb433227cda. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() [Implementation]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Window Length":"20sec"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### pairwise comparative inference method w/ contrastive training Pearson Correlation Coefficient: 0.69. Result ID: 698d949c8b517eb433227cdd. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() [Implementation]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Window Length":"5sec"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### AFAR Pearson Correlation Coefficient: 0.6. Result ID: 698d949c8b517eb433227cd2. [Reporting paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Window Length":"20sec"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### AFAR (mean subtracted) Pearson Correlation Coefficient: 0.58. Result ID: 698d949c8b517eb433227cd6. [Reporting paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Window Length":"20sec"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### pairwise comparative inference method Pearson Correlation Coefficient: 0.58. Result ID: 698d949c8b517eb433227cd9. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() [Implementation]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Window Length":"5sec"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### pairwise comparative inference method w/ contrastive training Pearson Correlation Coefficient: 0.57. Result ID: 698d949c8b517eb433227cdc. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() [Implementation]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Window Length":"1sec"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### AFAR (mean subtracted) Pearson Correlation Coefficient: 0.53. Result ID: 698d949c8b517eb433227cd5. [Reporting paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Window Length":"5sec"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### AFAR Pearson Correlation Coefficient: 0.51. Result ID: 698d949c8b517eb433227cd1. [Reporting paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Window Length":"5sec"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### pairwise comparative inference method w/ contrastive training Pearson Correlation Coefficient: 0.48. Result ID: 698d949c8b517eb433227cdb. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() [Implementation]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Window Length":"frame"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### pairwise comparative inference method Pearson Correlation Coefficient: 0.47. Result ID: 698d949c8b517eb433227cd8. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() [Implementation]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Window Length":"1sec"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### OpenFace Pearson Correlation Coefficient: 0.42. Result ID: 698d949c8b517eb433227cca. [Reporting paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Window Length":"20sec"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### AFAR (mean subtracted) Pearson Correlation Coefficient: 0.42. Result ID: 698d949c8b517eb433227cd4. [Reporting paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Window Length":"1sec"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### pairwise comparative inference method Pearson Correlation Coefficient: 0.42. Result ID: 698d949c8b517eb433227cd7. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() [Implementation]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Window Length":"frame"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### AFAR Pearson Correlation Coefficient: 0.4. Result ID: 698d949c8b517eb433227cd0. [Reporting paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Window Length":"1sec"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### SVR with DCT features Pearson Correlation Coefficient: 0.39. Result ID: 698d949c8b517eb433227cc6. [Reporting paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Window Length":"20sec"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### AFAR (mean subtracted) Pearson Correlation Coefficient: 0.33. Result ID: 698d949c8b517eb433227cd3. [Reporting paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Window Length":"frame"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### AFAR Pearson Correlation Coefficient: 0.31. Result ID: 698d949c8b517eb433227ccf. [Reporting paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Window Length":"frame"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### VGG16+LSTM Pearson Correlation Coefficient: 0.29. Result ID: 698d949c8b517eb433227ccd. [Reporting paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Window Length":"5sec"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### SVR with DCT features Pearson Correlation Coefficient: 0.28. Result ID: 698d949c8b517eb433227cc5. [Reporting paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Window Length":"5sec"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### OpenFace Pearson Correlation Coefficient: 0.27. Result ID: 698d949c8b517eb433227cc9. [Reporting paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Window Length":"5sec"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### VGG16+LSTM Pearson Correlation Coefficient: 0.27. Result ID: 698d949c8b517eb433227cce. [Reporting paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Window Length":"20sec"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### VGG16+LSTM Pearson Correlation Coefficient: 0.24. Result ID: 698d949c8b517eb433227ccc. [Reporting paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Window Length":"1sec"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### VGG16+LSTM Pearson Correlation Coefficient: 0.23. Result ID: 698d949c8b517eb433227ccb. [Reporting paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Window Length":"frame"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### SVR with DCT features Pearson Correlation Coefficient: 0.22. Result ID: 698d949c8b517eb433227cc4. [Reporting paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Window Length":"1sec"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### OpenFace Pearson Correlation Coefficient: 0.21. Result ID: 698d949c8b517eb433227cc8. [Reporting paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Window Length":"1sec"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### OpenFace Pearson Correlation Coefficient: 0.18. Result ID: 698d949c8b517eb433227cc7. [Reporting paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Window Length":"frame"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### SVR with DCT features Pearson Correlation Coefficient: 0.17. Result ID: 698d949c8b517eb433227cc3. [Reporting paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Window Length":"frame"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. Page 1 of 1. This is an index page, not the full collection.