# Optical Character Recognition on olmOCR multiple category 1.5

Source: [Optical Character Recognition on olmOCR multiple category 1.5](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/optical-character-recognition-on-olmocr-multiple-category-1-5>)

Collection index: [llms.txt](<https://www.sota2.com/research/llms.txt>)

Data updated: 2026-03-31T08:40:30.849Z

Evaluation of Optical Character Recognition performance on the olmOCR multiple category 1.5 dataset, reporting specific accuracies across various categories like math, tables, and multi-column text.

A research result applies to its stated dataset, split, metric and evaluation configuration. Compare like-for-like settings, preserve the metric's unit and direction, and distinguish paper-reported results from independent reproduction. The best result recorded here is not a claim of exhaustive, current global coverage.

| Scope | Recorded value |
| --- | --- |
| Task | Optical Character Recognition |
| Dataset (including any stated split) | olmOCR multiple category 1.5 |
| Metric | Average Accuracy |
| Unit | PERCENT |
| Direction | Higher is better |
| Results loaded | 9 of 9 |
| Coverage | All results currently returned for this benchmark |

Evaluation settings may differ between results. The original papers and recorded configurations are needed to establish comparability. A shared metric name alone does not establish an identical protocol.

## Metrics

- [Average Accuracy](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/optical-character-recognition-on-olmocr-multiple-category-1-5.md?metric=Average%20Accuracy>): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT.

- [Math Accuracy (ArXiv)](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/optical-character-recognition-on-olmocr-multiple-category-1-5.md?metric=Math%20Accuracy%20(ArXiv)>): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT.

- [Base Accuracy](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/optical-character-recognition-on-olmocr-multiple-category-1-5.md?metric=Base%20Accuracy>): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT.

- [Header/Footer Accuracy](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/optical-character-recognition-on-olmocr-multiple-category-1-5.md?metric=Header%2FFooter%20Accuracy>): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT.

- [TinyTxt Accuracy](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/optical-character-recognition-on-olmocr-multiple-category-1-5.md?metric=TinyTxt%20Accuracy>): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT.

- [Multi-Column Accuracy](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/optical-character-recognition-on-olmocr-multiple-category-1-5.md?metric=Multi-Column%20Accuracy>): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT.

- [Old Scan Accuracy](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/optical-character-recognition-on-olmocr-multiple-category-1-5.md?metric=Old%20Scan%20Accuracy>): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT.

- [Old Math Accuracy](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/optical-character-recognition-on-olmocr-multiple-category-1-5.md?metric=Old%20Math%20Accuracy>): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT.

- [Tables Accuracy](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/optical-character-recognition-on-olmocr-multiple-category-1-5.md?metric=Tables%20Accuracy>): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT.

## Recorded results

| Method | Average Accuracy | Result date | Report paper |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Chandra | 82 | Not recorded | 69cb54fe0636e5bf4afc9e7c |
| Mistral OCR 3 | 81.7 | Not recorded | 69cb54fe0636e5bf4afc9e7c |
| FalconOCR | 80.3 | Not recorded | 69cb54fe0636e5bf4afc9e7c |
| Gemini 3 Pro | 80.2 | Not recorded | 69cb54fe0636e5bf4afc9e7c |
| PaddleOCR VL 1.5 | 79.3 | Not recorded | 69cb54fe0636e5bf4afc9e7c |
| PaddleOCR VL | 79.2 | Not recorded | 69cb54fe0636e5bf4afc9e7c |
| DeepSeek OCR v2 | 78.8 | Not recorded | 69cb54fe0636e5bf4afc9e7c |
| Gemini 3 Flash | 77.5 | Not recorded | 69cb54fe0636e5bf4afc9e7c |
| GPT 5.2 | 69.8 | Not recorded | 69cb54fe0636e5bf4afc9e7c |

### Chandra

Average Accuracy: 82. Result ID: 69cb886b47f34ce924b3dcdf.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/69cb54fe0636e5bf4afc9e7c.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: Not recorded. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### Mistral OCR 3

Average Accuracy: 81.7. Result ID: 69cb886b47f34ce924b3dcde.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/69cb54fe0636e5bf4afc9e7c.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: Not recorded. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### FalconOCR

Average Accuracy: 80.3. Result ID: 69cb886b47f34ce924b3dce6.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/69cb54fe0636e5bf4afc9e7c.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/69cb54fe0636e5bf4afc9e7c.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: Not recorded. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### Gemini 3 Pro

Average Accuracy: 80.2. Result ID: 69cb886b47f34ce924b3dce0.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/69cb54fe0636e5bf4afc9e7c.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: Not recorded. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### PaddleOCR VL 1.5

Average Accuracy: 79.3. Result ID: 69cb886b47f34ce924b3dce1.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/69cb54fe0636e5bf4afc9e7c.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/697c3b70a8b01e76cc8da769.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: Not recorded. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### PaddleOCR VL

Average Accuracy: 79.2. Result ID: 69cb886b47f34ce924b3dce2.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/69cb54fe0636e5bf4afc9e7c.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa7c451e209131cea8d4d4.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: Not recorded. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### DeepSeek OCR v2

Average Accuracy: 78.8. Result ID: 69cb886b47f34ce924b3dce3.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/69cb54fe0636e5bf4afc9e7c.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/697ae9b8a2b28e761d87d127.md>)

[Implementation](<https://github.com/deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-OCR-2>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: Not recorded. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### Gemini 3 Flash

Average Accuracy: 77.5. Result ID: 69cb886b47f34ce924b3dce4.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/69cb54fe0636e5bf4afc9e7c.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: Not recorded. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### GPT 5.2

Average Accuracy: 69.8. Result ID: 69cb886b47f34ce924b3dce5.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/69cb54fe0636e5bf4afc9e7c.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: Not recorded. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

Page 1 of 1. This is an index page, not the full collection.
