# Opponent priority-ordering prediction on CaSiNo (5-fold CV)

Source: [Opponent priority-ordering prediction on CaSiNo (5-fold CV)](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/opponent-priority-ordering-prediction-on-casino-5-fold-cv>)

Collection index: [llms.txt](<https://www.sota2.com/research/llms.txt>)

Data updated: 2026-05-07T08:36:17.799Z

Evaluation of model performance on the CaSiNo dataset using 5-fold cross-validation for opponent priority-ordering prediction.

A research result applies to its stated dataset, split, metric and evaluation configuration. Compare like-for-like settings, preserve the metric's unit and direction, and distinguish paper-reported results from independent reproduction. The best result recorded here is not a claim of exhaustive, current global coverage.

| Scope | Recorded value |
| --- | --- |
| Task | Opponent priority-ordering prediction |
| Dataset (including any stated split) | CaSiNo (5-fold CV) |
| Metric | EMA |
| Unit | SCALAR |
| Direction | Higher is better |
| Results loaded | 5 of 5 |
| Coverage | All results currently returned for this benchmark |

Evaluation settings may differ between results. The original papers and recorded configurations are needed to establish comparability. A shared metric name alone does not establish an identical protocol.

## Metrics

- [EMA](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/opponent-priority-ordering-prediction-on-casino-5-fold-cv.md?metric=EMA>): Higher is better; unit: SCALAR.

- [Top-1 Acc](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/opponent-priority-ordering-prediction-on-casino-5-fold-cv.md?metric=Top-1%20Acc>): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT.

- [NDCG@3](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/opponent-priority-ordering-prediction-on-casino-5-fold-cv.md?metric=NDCG%403>): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT.

## Recorded results

| Method | EMA | Result date | Report paper |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Supervised SFT 8B | 53.84 | Not recorded | 69fc1cac5497b3b670c88621 |
| RoBERTa CD+CA+DND | 48.72 | Not recorded | 69fc1cac5497b3b670c88621 |
| BERT CD+CA+DND | 44.22 | Not recorded | 69fc1cac5497b3b670c88621 |
| BoW-Ranker | 27.71 | Not recorded | 69fc1cac5497b3b670c88621 |
| Random | 16.59 | Not recorded | 69fc1cac5497b3b670c88621 |

### Supervised SFT 8B

EMA: 53.84. Result ID: 69fc4e6447f34ce924df056c.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/69fc1cac5497b3b670c88621.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/69fc1cac5497b3b670c88621.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Backbone":"Llama-3.1-8B","Fine-tuning":"LoRA"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### RoBERTa CD+CA+DND

EMA: 48.72. Result ID: 69fc4e6447f34ce924df056b.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/69fc1cac5497b3b670c88621.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa6c7d1e209131cea3445e.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: Not recorded. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### BERT CD+CA+DND

EMA: 44.22. Result ID: 69fc4e6447f34ce924df056a.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/69fc1cac5497b3b670c88621.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa6c7d1e209131cea3445e.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: Not recorded. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### BoW-Ranker

EMA: 27.71. Result ID: 69fc4e6447f34ce924df0569.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/69fc1cac5497b3b670c88621.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa6c7d1e209131cea3445e.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: Not recorded. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### Random

EMA: 16.59. Result ID: 69fc4e6447f34ce924df0568.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/69fc1cac5497b3b670c88621.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa6c7d1e209131cea3445e.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: Not recorded. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

Page 1 of 1. This is an index page, not the full collection.
