# Opponent priority-ordering prediction on CaSiNo (150-dialogue held-out split)

Source: [Opponent priority-ordering prediction on CaSiNo (150-dialogue held-out split)](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/opponent-priority-ordering-prediction-on-casino-150-dialogue-held-out-split>)

Collection index: [llms.txt](<https://www.sota2.com/research/llms.txt>)

Data updated: 2026-05-07T08:36:17.841Z

Evaluation of Opponent priority-ordering prediction performance on the CaSiNo (150-dialogue held-out split) dataset, measured using EMA, Top-1, and NDCG@3.

A research result applies to its stated dataset, split, metric and evaluation configuration. Compare like-for-like settings, preserve the metric's unit and direction, and distinguish paper-reported results from independent reproduction. The best result recorded here is not a claim of exhaustive, current global coverage.

| Scope | Recorded value |
| --- | --- |
| Task | Opponent priority-ordering prediction |
| Dataset (including any stated split) | CaSiNo (150-dialogue held-out split) |
| Metric | EMA |
| Unit | PERCENT |
| Direction | Higher is better |
| Results loaded | 1 of 1 |
| Coverage | All results currently returned for this benchmark |

Evaluation settings may differ between results. The original papers and recorded configurations are needed to establish comparability. A shared metric name alone does not establish an identical protocol.

## Metrics

- [EMA](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/opponent-priority-ordering-prediction-on-casino-150-dialogue-held-out-split.md?metric=EMA>): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT.

- [Top-1 Acc](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/opponent-priority-ordering-prediction-on-casino-150-dialogue-held-out-split.md?metric=Top-1%20Acc>): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT.

- [NDCG@3](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/opponent-priority-ordering-prediction-on-casino-150-dialogue-held-out-split.md?metric=NDCG%403>): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT.

## Recorded results

| Method | EMA | Result date | Report paper |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 70B structured-CoT prompted | 37.3 | Not recorded | 69fc1cac5497b3b670c88621 |

### 70B structured-CoT prompted

EMA: 37.3. Result ID: 69fc4e6447f34ce924df056d.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/69fc1cac5497b3b670c88621.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa75d11e209131cea6a028.md>)

[Implementation](<https://github.com/meta-llama/llama-agentic-system>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Backbone":"Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct","Precision":"BF16","Temperature":"0.0","Prompting Strategy":"structured-CoT"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

Page 1 of 1. This is an index page, not the full collection.