# Open-ended QA Response Ranking on AlignBench Minos

Source: [Open-ended QA Response Ranking on AlignBench Minos](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/open-ended-qa-response-ranking-on-alignbench-minos>)

Collection index: [llms.txt](<https://www.sota2.com/research/llms.txt>)

Data updated: 2026-02-26T05:47:41.383Z

Evaluation of response ranking capabilities for open-ended Question Answering tasks using the AlignBench Minos dataset.

A research result applies to its stated dataset, split, metric and evaluation configuration. Compare like-for-like settings, preserve the metric's unit and direction, and distinguish paper-reported results from independent reproduction. The best result recorded here is not a claim of exhaustive, current global coverage.

| Scope | Recorded value |
| --- | --- |
| Task | Open-ended QA Response Ranking |
| Dataset (including any stated split) | AlignBench Minos |
| Metric | K Score |
| Unit | PERCENT |
| Direction | Higher is better |
| Results loaded | 9 of 9 |
| Coverage | All results currently returned for this benchmark |

Evaluation settings may differ between results. The original papers and recorded configurations are needed to establish comparability. A shared metric name alone does not establish an identical protocol.

## Metrics

- [K Score](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/open-ended-qa-response-ranking-on-alignbench-minos.md?metric=K%20Score>): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT.

- [S Score](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/open-ended-qa-response-ranking-on-alignbench-minos.md?metric=S%20Score>): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT.

- [RBO (p=0.5)](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/open-ended-qa-response-ranking-on-alignbench-minos.md?metric=RBO%20(p%3D0.5)>): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT.

- [RBO (p=0.9)](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/open-ended-qa-response-ranking-on-alignbench-minos.md?metric=RBO%20(p%3D0.9)>): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT.

## Recorded results

| Method | K Score | Result date | Report paper |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| MinosEval | 47.68 | Not recorded | 68fa797f1e209131cea7dd11 |
| MinosEval | 45.28 | Not recorded | 68fa797f1e209131cea7dd11 |
| Listwise | 41.47 | Not recorded | 68fa797f1e209131cea7dd11 |
| Pairwise | 38.66 | Not recorded | 68fa797f1e209131cea7dd11 |
| LINKAGE | 35.75 | Not recorded | 68fa797f1e209131cea7dd11 |
| Pointwise | 32.94 | Not recorded | 68fa797f1e209131cea7dd11 |
| BLEU | 15.41 | Not recorded | 68fa797f1e209131cea7dd11 |
| BERTScore | 13.62 | Not recorded | 68fa797f1e209131cea7dd11 |
| ROUGE-L | 13.38 | Not recorded | 68fa797f1e209131cea7dd11 |

### MinosEval

K Score: 47.68. Result ID: 698b4feb8d67a41d0a6cfcad.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa797f1e209131cea7dd11.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa797f1e209131cea7dd11.md>)

[Implementation](<https://github.com/JOHNNY-fans/MinosEval>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Manual Factoid Classification":true}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### MinosEval

K Score: 45.28. Result ID: 698b4feb8d67a41d0a6cfcac.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa797f1e209131cea7dd11.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa797f1e209131cea7dd11.md>)

[Implementation](<https://github.com/JOHNNY-fans/MinosEval>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: Not recorded. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### Listwise

K Score: 41.47. Result ID: 698b4feb8d67a41d0a6cfcaa.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa797f1e209131cea7dd11.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: Not recorded. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### Pairwise

K Score: 38.66. Result ID: 698b4feb8d67a41d0a6cfca9.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa797f1e209131cea7dd11.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa78081e209131cea76714.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: Not recorded. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### LINKAGE

K Score: 35.75. Result ID: 698b4feb8d67a41d0a6cfcab.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa797f1e209131cea7dd11.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa74f71e209131cea64ef3.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: Not recorded. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### Pointwise

K Score: 32.94. Result ID: 698b4feb8d67a41d0a6cfca8.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa797f1e209131cea7dd11.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa6f6b1e209131cea4574f.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: Not recorded. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### BLEU

K Score: 15.41. Result ID: 698b4feb8d67a41d0a6cfca5.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa797f1e209131cea7dd11.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: Not recorded. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### BERTScore

K Score: 13.62. Result ID: 698b4feb8d67a41d0a6cfca7.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa797f1e209131cea7dd11.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa67171e209131cea140d5.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: Not recorded. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### ROUGE-L

K Score: 13.38. Result ID: 698b4feb8d67a41d0a6cfca6.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa797f1e209131cea7dd11.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: Not recorded. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

Page 1 of 1. This is an index page, not the full collection.
