# Oblivious Transfer on OT protocols from literature Source: [Oblivious Transfer on OT protocols from literature]() Collection index: [llms.txt]() Data updated: 2026-06-02T13:18:54.723Z Evaluation of Oblivious Transfer performance using protocols sourced from literature, focusing on communication rounds and execution times across sender, receiver, and IoT receiver components. A research result applies to its stated dataset, split, metric and evaluation configuration. Compare like-for-like settings, preserve the metric's unit and direction, and distinguish paper-reported results from independent reproduction. The best result recorded here is not a claim of exhaustive, current global coverage. | Scope | Recorded value | | --- | --- | | Task | Oblivious Transfer | | Dataset (including any stated split) | OT protocols from literature | | Metric | Communication Rounds | | Unit | SCALAR | | Direction | Lower is better | | Results loaded | 29 of 29 | | Coverage | All results currently returned for this benchmark | Evaluation settings may differ between results. The original papers and recorded configurations are needed to establish comparability. A shared metric name alone does not establish an identical protocol. ## Metrics - [Communication Rounds](): Lower is better; unit: SCALAR. - [Global Execution Time (µs)](): Lower is better; unit: TIME. - [Sender Execution Time (µs)](): Lower is better; unit: TIME. - [Receiver Online Execution Time (µs)](): Lower is better; unit: TIME. - [IoT Receiver Online Execution Time (µs)](): Lower is better; unit: TIME. ## Recorded results | Method | Communication Rounds | Result date | Report paper | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | \[16\] | 1 | Not recorded | 6a1e6422dbd7150506f857b6 | | \[17\] | 2 | Not recorded | 6a1e6422dbd7150506f857b6 | | \[7\] | 2 | Not recorded | 6a1e6422dbd7150506f857b6 | | \[18\] | 2 | Not recorded | 6a1e6422dbd7150506f857b6 | | \[19\] | 2 | Not recorded | 6a1e6422dbd7150506f857b6 | | \[20\] | 2 | Not recorded | 6a1e6422dbd7150506f857b6 | | \[21\] | 2 | Not recorded | 6a1e6422dbd7150506f857b6 | | \[10\] | 2 | Not recorded | 6a1e6422dbd7150506f857b6 | | \[14\] | 2 | Not recorded | 6a1e6422dbd7150506f857b6 | | \[14\] (Ported) | 2 | Not recorded | 6a1e6422dbd7150506f857b6 | | \[22\] | 2 | Not recorded | 6a1e6422dbd7150506f857b6 | | \[23\] | 2 | Not recorded | 6a1e6422dbd7150506f857b6 | | \[24\] | 2 | Not recorded | 6a1e6422dbd7150506f857b6 | | \[25\] | 2 | Not recorded | 6a1e6422dbd7150506f857b6 | | \[26\] | 2 | Not recorded | 6a1e6422dbd7150506f857b6 | | \[27\] | 2 | Not recorded | 6a1e6422dbd7150506f857b6 | | \[28\] | 2 | Not recorded | 6a1e6422dbd7150506f857b6 | | \[30\] | 2 | Not recorded | 6a1e6422dbd7150506f857b6 | | \[31\] | 2 | Not recorded | 6a1e6422dbd7150506f857b6 | | \[32\] | 2 | Not recorded | 6a1e6422dbd7150506f857b6 | | \[33\] | 2 | Not recorded | 6a1e6422dbd7150506f857b6 | | I-(OT)^2 | 2 | Not recorded | 6a1e6422dbd7150506f857b6 | | \[15\] | 3 | Not recorded | 6a1e6422dbd7150506f857b6 | | \[9\] | 3 | Not recorded | 6a1e6422dbd7150506f857b6 | | \[13\] | 3 | Not recorded | 6a1e6422dbd7150506f857b6 | | \[29\] | 4 | Not recorded | 6a1e6422dbd7150506f857b6 | | \[34\] | 4 | Not recorded | 6a1e6422dbd7150506f857b6 | ### \[16\] Communication Rounds: 1. Result ID: 6a1ed822fbc373592c1adc4a. [Reporting paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Year":"1989","Choosable inputs":"✓","Resilience to malicious adv.":"✓","No Trusted Third Party required":"✓","Cryptographic primitives":"CDH","Proof-of-concept implementation":"Not addressed by authors."}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### \[17\] Communication Rounds: 2. Result ID: 6a1ed822fbc373592c1adc4b. [Reporting paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Year":"1999","Choosable inputs":"✓","Resilience to malicious adv.":"✓","No Trusted Third Party required":"✓","Cryptographic primitives":"Trusted initializer","Proof-of-concept implementation":"Not addressed by authors."}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### \[7\] Communication Rounds: 2. Result ID: 6a1ed822fbc373592c1adc4c. [Reporting paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Year":"2004","Choosable inputs":"✓","Resilience to malicious adv.":"✓","No Trusted Third Party required":"✓","Cryptographic primitives":"DDH","Proof-of-concept implementation":"Not addressed by authors."}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### \[18\] Communication Rounds: 2. Result ID: 6a1ed822fbc373592c1adc4d. [Reporting paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Year":"2005","Resilience to malicious adv.":"✓","Cryptographic primitives":"Noisy channel","Proof-of-concept implementation":"Not addressed by authors."}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### \[19\] Communication Rounds: 2. Result ID: 6a1ed822fbc373592c1adc4e. [Reporting paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Year":"2008","Choosable inputs":"✓","Resilience to malicious adv.":"✓","No Trusted Third Party required":"✓","Cryptographic primitives":"PKE (DDH/LWE)","Proof-of-concept implementation":"Not addressed by authors."}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### \[20\] Communication Rounds: 2. Result ID: 6a1ed822fbc373592c1adc4f. [Reporting paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Year":"2011","Choosable inputs":"✓","Resilience to malicious adv.":"✓","No Trusted Third Party required":"✓","Cryptographic primitives":"ROM","Proof-of-concept implementation":"Not addressed by authors."}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### \[21\] Communication Rounds: 2. Result ID: 6a1ed822fbc373592c1adc50. [Reporting paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Year":"2012","Choosable inputs":"✓","Resilience to malicious adv.":"✓","No Trusted Third Party required":"✓","Cryptographic primitives":"DDH","Proof-of-concept implementation":"Not addressed by authors."}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### \[10\] Communication Rounds: 2. Result ID: 6a1ed822fbc373592c1adc51. [Reporting paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Year":"2015","Choosable inputs":"✓","Resilience to malicious adv.":"✓","No Trusted Third Party required":"✓","Cryptographic primitives":"DDH","Proof-of-concept implementation":"✓","Open Source":"✓","Language":"C (of \[19\])"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### \[14\] Communication Rounds: 2. Result ID: 6a1ed822fbc373592c1adc52. [Reporting paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Year":"2015","Resilience to malicious adv.":"✓","No Trusted Third Party required":"✓","Cryptographic primitives":"DH","Proof-of-concept implementation":"✓","Open Source":"✓","Language":"Assembly"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### \[14\] (Ported) Communication Rounds: 2. Result ID: 6a1ed822fbc373592c1adc53. [Reporting paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Note":"Results obtained over our porting of the library.","Cryptographic primitives":"DH","Open Source":"✓","Language":"C","Pre-computation":"false"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### \[22\] Communication Rounds: 2. Result ID: 6a1ed822fbc373592c1adc55. [Reporting paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Year":"2019","Choosable inputs":"✓","Resilience to malicious adv.":"✓","No Trusted Third Party required":"✓","Cryptographic primitives":"Ideal lattice","Proof-of-concept implementation":"Not addressed by authors."}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### \[23\] Communication Rounds: 2. Result ID: 6a1ed822fbc373592c1adc56. [Reporting paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Year":"2019","Choosable inputs":"✓","Resilience to malicious adv.":"✓","No Trusted Third Party required":"✓","Cryptographic primitives":"PKE (LWE, RO)","Proof-of-concept implementation":"✓","Open Source":"✓","Language":"Assembly"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### \[24\] Communication Rounds: 2. Result ID: 6a1ed822fbc373592c1adc57. [Reporting paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Year":"2020","Choosable inputs":"✓","Resilience to malicious adv.":"✓","No Trusted Third Party required":"✓","Cryptographic primitives":"CDH","Proof-of-concept implementation":"Not addressed by authors."}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### \[25\] Communication Rounds: 2. Result ID: 6a1ed822fbc373592c1adc58. [Reporting paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Year":"2020","Choosable inputs":"✓","Resilience to malicious adv.":"✓","No Trusted Third Party required":"✓","Cryptographic primitives":"ROM (RQC-III)","Proof-of-concept implementation":"✓","Language":"unspecified"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### \[26\] Communication Rounds: 2. Result ID: 6a1ed822fbc373592c1adc5b. [Reporting paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Year":"2021","Resilience to malicious adv.":"✓","Cryptographic primitives":"Isogeny","Proof-of-concept implementation":"Not addressed by authors."}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### \[27\] Communication Rounds: 2. Result ID: 6a1ed822fbc373592c1adc5c. [Reporting paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Year":"2022","Choosable inputs":"✓","Resilience to malicious adv.":"✓","No Trusted Third Party required":"✓","Cryptographic primitives":"PKE (ROM)","Proof-of-concept implementation":"Not addressed by authors."}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### \[28\] Communication Rounds: 2. Result ID: 6a1ed822fbc373592c1adc5d. [Reporting paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Year":"2024","Choosable inputs":"✓","Resilience to malicious adv.":"✓","No Trusted Third Party required":"✓","Cryptographic primitives":"QR + LPN","Proof-of-concept implementation":"Not addressed by authors."}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### \[30\] Communication Rounds: 2. Result ID: 6a1ed822fbc373592c1adc5f. [Reporting paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Year":"2024","Resilience to malicious adv.":"✓","No Trusted Third Party required":"✓","Cryptographic primitives":"NI + LWE + ROM","Proof-of-concept implementation":"✓","Open Source":"✓","Language":"C"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### \[31\] Communication Rounds: 2. Result ID: 6a1ed822fbc373592c1adc60. [Reporting paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Year":"2025","Choosable inputs":"✓","Cryptographic primitives":"DDH","Proof-of-concept implementation":"Not addressed by authors."}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### \[32\] Communication Rounds: 2. Result ID: 6a1ed822fbc373592c1adc61. [Reporting paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Year":"2025","Choosable inputs":"✓","Cryptographic primitives":"Quantum ent.","Proof-of-concept implementation":"Not addressed by authors."}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### \[33\] Communication Rounds: 2. Result ID: 6a1ed822fbc373592c1adc62. [Reporting paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Year":"2025","Resilience to malicious adv.":"✓","No Trusted Third Party required":"✓","Cryptographic primitives":"Quantum ent.","Proof-of-concept implementation":"Not addressed by authors."}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### I-(OT)^2 Communication Rounds: 2. Result ID: 6a1ed822fbc373592c1adc64. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Year":"2026","Choosable inputs":"✓","Communication Transfer Rounds":"2","Resilience to malicious adv.":"✓","No Trusted Third Party required":"✓","Cryptographic primitives":"QR","Proof-of-concept implementation":"✓","Allows for Receiver pre-computation":"✓","Open Source":"✓","Language":"C/Python","Pre-computation":"false"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### \[15\] Communication Rounds: 3. Result ID: 6a1ed822fbc373592c1adc49. [Reporting paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Year":"1985","Choosable inputs":"✓","Resilience to malicious adv.":"✓","No Trusted Third Party required":"✓","Cryptographic primitives":"PKE","Proof-of-concept implementation":"Not addressed by authors."}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### \[9\] Communication Rounds: 3. Result ID: 6a1ed822fbc373592c1adc59. [Reporting paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Year":"2020","Choosable inputs":"✓","Resilience to malicious adv.":"✓","No Trusted Third Party required":"✓","Cryptographic primitives":"LWE","Proof-of-concept implementation":"Not addressed by authors."}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### \[13\] Communication Rounds: 3. Result ID: 6a1ed822fbc373592c1adc5a. [Reporting paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Year":"2020","Resilience to malicious adv.":"✓","No Trusted Third Party required":"✓","Cryptographic primitives":"CDH","Proof-of-concept implementation":"✓","Open Source":"(✓)","Language":"Relic"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### \[29\] Communication Rounds: 4. Result ID: 6a1ed822fbc373592c1adc5e. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Year":"2024","Choosable inputs":"✓","Cryptographic primitives":"NI","Proof-of-concept implementation":"✓","Security":"unconditional","Language":"C++"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### \[34\] Communication Rounds: 4. Result ID: 6a1ed822fbc373592c1adc63. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Year":"2026","Choosable inputs":"✓","Cryptographic primitives":"NI","Proof-of-concept implementation":"✓","Language":"C++"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. Page 1 of 1. This is an index page, not the full collection.