# Object Detection & Tracking on Simulated Office Environment 100 cases (test) Source: [Object Detection & Tracking on Simulated Office Environment 100 cases (test)]() Collection index: [llms.txt]() Data updated: 2026-03-05T07:37:30.773Z Evaluation of perception performance, specifically object detection and tracking, on the test split of the Simulated Office Environment 100 cases dataset, utilizing metrics such as average detection object score, track rate, and confidence scores. A research result applies to its stated dataset, split, metric and evaluation configuration. Compare like-for-like settings, preserve the metric's unit and direction, and distinguish paper-reported results from independent reproduction. The best result recorded here is not a claim of exhaustive, current global coverage. | Scope | Recorded value | | --- | --- | | Task | Perception (Object Detection & Tracking) | | Dataset (including any stated split) | Simulated Office Environment 100 cases (test) | | Metric | Avg Det Obj Score (0-4) | | Unit | SCALAR | | Direction | Higher is better | | Results loaded | 4 of 4 | | Coverage | All results currently returned for this benchmark | Evaluation settings may differ between results. The original papers and recorded configurations are needed to establish comparability. A shared metric name alone does not establish an identical protocol. ## Metrics - [Avg Det Obj Score (0-4)](): Higher is better; unit: SCALAR. - [Track Rate (0-1)](): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT. - [Avg Conf Score (0-1)](): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT. - [Scaled Avg Conf Score (0-4)](): Higher is better; unit: SCALAR. ## Recorded results | Method | Avg Det Obj Score (0-4) | Result date | Report paper | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | MOPS-PRM | 1.53 | Not recorded | 69a90de82d603e6de3e40663 | | Lowest-Cost-Object | 1.12 | Not recorded | 69a90de82d603e6de3e40663 | | Closest-Object | 0.5 | Not recorded | 69a90de82d603e6de3e40663 | | Closest-Object Low-DoF | 0.44 | Not recorded | 69a90de82d603e6de3e40663 | ### MOPS-PRM Avg Det Obj Score (0-4): 1.53. Result ID: 69a931ac6dbb7075b9523d59. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Cost Fun.":"Neural"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### Lowest-Cost-Object Avg Det Obj Score (0-4): 1.12. Result ID: 69a931ac6dbb7075b9523d58. [Reporting paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Cost Fun.":"Neural"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### Closest-Object Avg Det Obj Score (0-4): 0.5. Result ID: 69a931ac6dbb7075b9523d57. [Reporting paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Cost Fun.":"Distance"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### Closest-Object Low-DoF Avg Det Obj Score (0-4): 0.44. Result ID: 69a931ac6dbb7075b9523d56. [Reporting paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Cost Fun.":"Distance"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. Page 1 of 1. This is an index page, not the full collection.