# Natural Language Inference on CMNLI syntactically perturbed Source: [Natural Language Inference on CMNLI syntactically perturbed]() Collection index: [llms.txt]() Data updated: 2026-04-02T09:43:28.592Z Evaluation of Natural Language Inference performance on the syntactically perturbed subset of the CMNLI dataset, measured by Accuracy. A research result applies to its stated dataset, split, metric and evaluation configuration. Compare like-for-like settings, preserve the metric's unit and direction, and distinguish paper-reported results from independent reproduction. The best result recorded here is not a claim of exhaustive, current global coverage. | Scope | Recorded value | | --- | --- | | Task | Natural Language Inference | | Dataset (including any stated split) | CMNLI syntactically perturbed | | Metric | Accuracy | | Unit | PERCENT | | Direction | Higher is better | | Results loaded | 17 of 17 | | Coverage | All results currently returned for this benchmark | Evaluation settings may differ between results. The original papers and recorded configurations are needed to establish comparability. A shared metric name alone does not establish an identical protocol. ## Metrics - [Accuracy](): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT. ## Recorded results | Method | Accuracy | Result date | Report paper | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | SyCo | 76.67 | Not recorded | 69cdf8400636e5bf4afcccaf | | T2ARD+TA-LoRA | 75.39 | Not recorded | 69cdf8400636e5bf4afcccaf | | TA-LoRA | 74.57 | Not recorded | 69cdf8400636e5bf4afcccaf | | POEM+TA-LoRA | 74.17 | Not recorded | 69cdf8400636e5bf4afcccaf | | TENT+SPoT | 72.2 | Not recorded | 69cdf8400636e5bf4afcccaf | | SPoT | 71.85 | Not recorded | 69cdf8400636e5bf4afcccaf | | T2ARD+MPT | 71.46 | Not recorded | 69cdf8400636e5bf4afcccaf | | POEM+MPT | 69.24 | Not recorded | 69cdf8400636e5bf4afcccaf | | MPT | 68.29 | Not recorded | 69cdf8400636e5bf4afcccaf | | ClusT3+ATTEMPT | 66.73 | Not recorded | 69cdf8400636e5bf4afcccaf | | T2ARD | 66.4 | Not recorded | 69cdf8400636e5bf4afcccaf | | ATTEMPT | 66.18 | Not recorded | 69cdf8400636e5bf4afcccaf | | POEM | 64.96 | Not recorded | 69cdf8400636e5bf4afcccaf | | FOA | 63.53 | Not recorded | 69cdf8400636e5bf4afcccaf | | ClusT3 | 62.09 | Not recorded | 69cdf8400636e5bf4afcccaf | | TENT | 60.66 | Not recorded | 69cdf8400636e5bf4afcccaf | | PT | 59.8 | Not recorded | 69cdf8400636e5bf4afcccaf | ### SyCo Accuracy: 76.67. Result ID: 69ce3a2747f34ce924b7c947. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Paradigm":"MOA"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### T2ARD+TA-LoRA Accuracy: 75.39. Result ID: 69ce3a2747f34ce924b7c946. [Reporting paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Paradigm":"MOA"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### TA-LoRA Accuracy: 74.57. Result ID: 69ce3a2747f34ce924b7c940. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Paradigm":"MTL"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### POEM+TA-LoRA Accuracy: 74.17. Result ID: 69ce3a2747f34ce924b7c945. [Reporting paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Paradigm":"MOA"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### TENT+SPoT Accuracy: 72.2. Result ID: 69ce3a2747f34ce924b7c941. [Reporting paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Paradigm":"MOA"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### SPoT Accuracy: 71.85. Result ID: 69ce3a2747f34ce924b7c93d. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() [Implementation]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Paradigm":"MTL"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### T2ARD+MPT Accuracy: 71.46. Result ID: 69ce3a2747f34ce924b7c944. [Reporting paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Paradigm":"MOA"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### POEM+MPT Accuracy: 69.24. Result ID: 69ce3a2747f34ce924b7c943. [Reporting paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Paradigm":"MOA"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### MPT Accuracy: 68.29. Result ID: 69ce3a2747f34ce924b7c93f. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Paradigm":"MTL"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### ClusT3+ATTEMPT Accuracy: 66.73. Result ID: 69ce3a2747f34ce924b7c942. [Reporting paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Paradigm":"MOA"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### T2ARD Accuracy: 66.4. Result ID: 69ce3a2747f34ce924b7c93c. [Reporting paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Paradigm":"TTA"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### ATTEMPT Accuracy: 66.18. Result ID: 69ce3a2747f34ce924b7c93e. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Paradigm":"MTL"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### POEM Accuracy: 64.96. Result ID: 69ce3a2747f34ce924b7c93b. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Paradigm":"TTA"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### FOA Accuracy: 63.53. Result ID: 69ce3a2747f34ce924b7c93a. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Paradigm":"TTA"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### ClusT3 Accuracy: 62.09. Result ID: 69ce3a2747f34ce924b7c939. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Paradigm":"TTA"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### TENT Accuracy: 60.66. Result ID: 69ce3a2747f34ce924b7c938. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Paradigm":"TTA"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### PT Accuracy: 59.8. Result ID: 69ce3a2747f34ce924b7c937. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Paradigm":"Vanilla"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. Page 1 of 1. This is an index page, not the full collection.