# Natural Language Inference on ChaosNLI S\_amb (test) Source: [Natural Language Inference on ChaosNLI S\_amb (test)]() Collection index: [llms.txt]() Data updated: 2026-04-03T08:53:02.589Z Evaluation of Natural Language Inference performance on the test split of the ChaosNLI S\_amb dataset, measured by Top-1 accuracy and specific difference metrics. A research result applies to its stated dataset, split, metric and evaluation configuration. Compare like-for-like settings, preserve the metric's unit and direction, and distinguish paper-reported results from independent reproduction. The best result recorded here is not a claim of exhaustive, current global coverage. | Scope | Recorded value | | --- | --- | | Task | Natural Language Inference | | Dataset (including any stated split) | ChaosNLI S\_amb (test) | | Metric | Top-1 Accuracy | | Unit | PERCENT | | Direction | Higher is better | | Results loaded | 27 of 27 | | Coverage | All results currently returned for this benchmark | Evaluation settings may differ between results. The original papers and recorded configurations are needed to establish comparability. A shared metric name alone does not establish an identical protocol. ## Metrics - [Top-1 Accuracy](): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT. - [Difference (A-B)](): Higher is better; unit: SCALAR. - [Difference (A-C)](): Higher is better; unit: SCALAR. ## Recorded results | Method | Top-1 Accuracy | Result date | Report paper | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Model A (projection target) | 41.8 | Not recorded | 69cf49b30636e5bf4afcdb23 | | Model C (vote-proportion target) | 41.5 | Not recorded | 69cf49b30636e5bf4afcdb23 | | Model A (projection target) | 41 | Not recorded | 69cf49b30636e5bf4afcdb23 | | Model C (vote-proportion target) | 40.6 | Not recorded | 69cf49b30636e5bf4afcdb23 | | Model C (vote-proportion target) | 40.5 | Not recorded | 69cf49b30636e5bf4afcdb23 | | Model A (projection target) | 40.4 | Not recorded | 69cf49b30636e5bf4afcdb23 | | Model A (projection target) | 40.1 | Not recorded | 69cf49b30636e5bf4afcdb23 | | Model A (projection target) | 40 | Not recorded | 69cf49b30636e5bf4afcdb23 | | Model A (projection target) | 39.5 | Not recorded | 69cf49b30636e5bf4afcdb23 | | Model B (antipignistic target) | 39.1 | Not recorded | 69cf49b30636e5bf4afcdb23 | | Model B (antipignistic target) | 39.1 | Not recorded | 69cf49b30636e5bf4afcdb23 | | Model C (vote-proportion target) | 38.9 | Not recorded | 69cf49b30636e5bf4afcdb23 | | Model B (antipignistic target) | 38.2 | Not recorded | 69cf49b30636e5bf4afcdb23 | | Model C (vote-proportion target) | 38.1 | Not recorded | 69cf49b30636e5bf4afcdb23 | | Model B (antipignistic target) | 38 | Not recorded | 69cf49b30636e5bf4afcdb23 | | Model C (vote-proportion target) | 37.3 | Not recorded | 69cf49b30636e5bf4afcdb23 | | Model B (antipignistic target) | 37.3 | Not recorded | 69cf49b30636e5bf4afcdb23 | | Model B (antipignistic target) | 37.2 | Not recorded | 69cf49b30636e5bf4afcdb23 | | Model B (antipignistic target) | 37.1 | Not recorded | 69cf49b30636e5bf4afcdb23 | | Model C (vote-proportion target) | 35.8 | Not recorded | 69cf49b30636e5bf4afcdb23 | | Model C (vote-proportion target) | 35.7 | Not recorded | 69cf49b30636e5bf4afcdb23 | | Model A (projection target) | 34.7 | Not recorded | 69cf49b30636e5bf4afcdb23 | | Model B (antipignistic target) | 34.3 | Not recorded | 69cf49b30636e5bf4afcdb23 | | Model A (projection target) | 34.1 | Not recorded | 69cf49b30636e5bf4afcdb23 | | Model B (antipignistic target) | 34.1 | Not recorded | 69cf49b30636e5bf4afcdb23 | | Model A (projection target) | 33.7 | Not recorded | 69cf49b30636e5bf4afcdb23 | | Model C (vote-proportion target) | 33.2 | Not recorded | 69cf49b30636e5bf4afcdb23 | ### Model A (projection target) Top-1 Accuracy: 41.8. Result ID: 69cf7fd147f34ce924b97dd6. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Train section":"train\_S\_easy","Val section":"val\_S\_easy","Learning Rate":"0.2"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### Model C (vote-proportion target) Top-1 Accuracy: 41.5. Result ID: 69cf7fd147f34ce924b97dd2. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Train section":"train\_S\_easy","Val section":"val\_full","Learning Rate":"0.2"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### Model A (projection target) Top-1 Accuracy: 41. Result ID: 69cf7fd147f34ce924b97dca. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Train section":"train\_S\_amb","Val section":"val\_S\_amb","Learning Rate":"0.009"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### Model C (vote-proportion target) Top-1 Accuracy: 40.6. Result ID: 69cf7fd147f34ce924b97dd8. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Train section":"train\_S\_easy","Val section":"val\_S\_easy","Learning Rate":"0.3"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### Model C (vote-proportion target) Top-1 Accuracy: 40.5. Result ID: 69cf7fd147f34ce924b97dc9. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Train section":"train\_S\_amb","Val section":"val\_full","Learning Rate":"0.003"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### Model A (projection target) Top-1 Accuracy: 40.4. Result ID: 69cf7fd147f34ce924b97dcd. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Train section":"train\_S\_amb","Val section":"val\_S\_easy","Learning Rate":"0.01"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### Model A (projection target) Top-1 Accuracy: 40.1. Result ID: 69cf7fd147f34ce924b97dc7. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Train section":"train\_S\_amb","Val section":"val\_full","Learning Rate":"0.009"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### Model A (projection target) Top-1 Accuracy: 40. Result ID: 69cf7fd147f34ce924b97dc1. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Train section":"train\_full","Val section":"val\_S\_amb","Learning Rate":"0.5"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### Model A (projection target) Top-1 Accuracy: 39.5. Result ID: 69cf7fd147f34ce924b97dd3. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Train section":"train\_S\_easy","Val section":"val\_S\_amb","Learning Rate":"0.08"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### Model B (antipignistic target) Top-1 Accuracy: 39.1. Result ID: 69cf7fd147f34ce924b97dc2. [Reporting paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Train section":"train\_full","Val section":"val\_S\_amb","Learning Rate":"0.6"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### Model B (antipignistic target) Top-1 Accuracy: 39.1. Result ID: 69cf7fd147f34ce924b97dc8. [Reporting paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Train section":"train\_S\_amb","Val section":"val\_full","Learning Rate":"0.6"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### Model C (vote-proportion target) Top-1 Accuracy: 38.9. Result ID: 69cf7fd147f34ce924b97dcc. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Train section":"train\_S\_amb","Val section":"val\_S\_amb","Learning Rate":"0.7"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### Model B (antipignistic target) Top-1 Accuracy: 38.2. Result ID: 69cf7fd147f34ce924b97dd7. [Reporting paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Train section":"train\_S\_easy","Val section":"val\_S\_easy","Learning Rate":"0.09"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### Model C (vote-proportion target) Top-1 Accuracy: 38.1. Result ID: 69cf7fd147f34ce924b97dd5. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Train section":"train\_S\_easy","Val section":"val\_S\_amb","Learning Rate":"0.3"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### Model B (antipignistic target) Top-1 Accuracy: 38. Result ID: 69cf7fd147f34ce924b97dd1. [Reporting paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Train section":"train\_S\_easy","Val section":"val\_full","Learning Rate":"0.1"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### Model C (vote-proportion target) Top-1 Accuracy: 37.3. Result ID: 69cf7fd147f34ce924b97dc3. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Train section":"train\_full","Val section":"val\_S\_amb","Learning Rate":"0.0001"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### Model B (antipignistic target) Top-1 Accuracy: 37.3. Result ID: 69cf7fd147f34ce924b97dcb. [Reporting paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Train section":"train\_S\_amb","Val section":"val\_S\_amb","Learning Rate":"0.7"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### Model B (antipignistic target) Top-1 Accuracy: 37.2. Result ID: 69cf7fd147f34ce924b97dce. [Reporting paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Train section":"train\_S\_amb","Val section":"val\_S\_easy","Learning Rate":"0.8"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### Model B (antipignistic target) Top-1 Accuracy: 37.1. Result ID: 69cf7fd147f34ce924b97dd4. [Reporting paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Train section":"train\_S\_easy","Val section":"val\_S\_amb","Learning Rate":"0.7"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### Model C (vote-proportion target) Top-1 Accuracy: 35.8. Result ID: 69cf7fd147f34ce924b97dc0. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Train section":"train\_full","Val section":"val\_full","Learning Rate":"0.005"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### Model C (vote-proportion target) Top-1 Accuracy: 35.7. Result ID: 69cf7fd147f34ce924b97dcf. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Train section":"train\_S\_amb","Val section":"val\_S\_easy","Learning Rate":"0.5"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### Model A (projection target) Top-1 Accuracy: 34.7. Result ID: 69cf7fd147f34ce924b97dd0. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Train section":"train\_S\_easy","Val section":"val\_full","Learning Rate":"0.005"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### Model B (antipignistic target) Top-1 Accuracy: 34.3. Result ID: 69cf7fd147f34ce924b97dbf. [Reporting paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Train section":"train\_full","Val section":"val\_full","Learning Rate":"0.007"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### Model A (projection target) Top-1 Accuracy: 34.1. Result ID: 69cf7fd147f34ce924b97dc4. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Train section":"train\_full","Val section":"val\_S\_easy","Learning Rate":"0.03"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### Model B (antipignistic target) Top-1 Accuracy: 34.1. Result ID: 69cf7fd147f34ce924b97dc5. [Reporting paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Train section":"train\_full","Val section":"val\_S\_easy","Learning Rate":"0.007"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### Model A (projection target) Top-1 Accuracy: 33.7. Result ID: 69cf7fd147f34ce924b97dbe. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Train section":"train\_full","Val section":"val\_full","Learning Rate":"0.007"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### Model C (vote-proportion target) Top-1 Accuracy: 33.2. Result ID: 69cf7fd147f34ce924b97dc6. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Train section":"train\_full","Val section":"val\_S\_easy","Learning Rate":"0.08"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. Page 1 of 1. This is an index page, not the full collection.