# Natural Language Inference on ChaosNLI S easy (test) Source: [Natural Language Inference on ChaosNLI S easy (test)]() Collection index: [llms.txt]() Data updated: 2026-04-03T08:53:02.634Z Evaluation of Natural Language Inference performance on the 'S easy' test split of the ChaosNLI dataset, reporting Top-1 accuracy and specific difference metrics. A research result applies to its stated dataset, split, metric and evaluation configuration. Compare like-for-like settings, preserve the metric's unit and direction, and distinguish paper-reported results from independent reproduction. The best result recorded here is not a claim of exhaustive, current global coverage. | Scope | Recorded value | | --- | --- | | Task | Natural Language Inference | | Dataset (including any stated split) | ChaosNLI S easy (test) | | Metric | Top-1 Accuracy | | Unit | PERCENT | | Direction | Higher is better | | Results loaded | 27 of 27 | | Coverage | All results currently returned for this benchmark | Evaluation settings may differ between results. The original papers and recorded configurations are needed to establish comparability. A shared metric name alone does not establish an identical protocol. ## Metrics - [Top-1 Accuracy](): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT. - [Difference (A vs B)](): Higher is better; unit: SCALAR. - [Difference (A vs C)](): Higher is better; unit: SCALAR. ## Recorded results | Method | Top-1 Accuracy | Result date | Report paper | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Model B (antipignistic target) | 62.4 | Not recorded | 69cf49b30636e5bf4afcdb23 | | Model A (projection target) | 61.7 | Not recorded | 69cf49b30636e5bf4afcdb23 | | Model A (projection target) | 61.6 | Not recorded | 69cf49b30636e5bf4afcdb23 | | Model A (projection target) | 61.3 | Not recorded | 69cf49b30636e5bf4afcdb23 | | Model C (vote-proportion target) | 60.8 | Not recorded | 69cf49b30636e5bf4afcdb23 | | Model B (antipignistic target) | 60.4 | Not recorded | 69cf49b30636e5bf4afcdb23 | | Model C (vote-proportion target) | 60.4 | Not recorded | 69cf49b30636e5bf4afcdb23 | | Model C (vote-proportion target) | 59.3 | Not recorded | 69cf49b30636e5bf4afcdb23 | | Model C (vote-proportion target) | 58.9 | Not recorded | 69cf49b30636e5bf4afcdb23 | | Model B (antipignistic target) | 58.4 | Not recorded | 69cf49b30636e5bf4afcdb23 | | Model B (antipignistic target) | 57.5 | Not recorded | 69cf49b30636e5bf4afcdb23 | | Model A (projection target) | 57.3 | Not recorded | 69cf49b30636e5bf4afcdb23 | | Model A (projection target) | 57.1 | Not recorded | 69cf49b30636e5bf4afcdb23 | | Model B (antipignistic target) | 56 | Not recorded | 69cf49b30636e5bf4afcdb23 | | Model C (vote-proportion target) | 55.5 | Not recorded | 69cf49b30636e5bf4afcdb23 | | Model B (antipignistic target) | 54.1 | Not recorded | 69cf49b30636e5bf4afcdb23 | | Model A (projection target) | 53.2 | Not recorded | 69cf49b30636e5bf4afcdb23 | | Model C (vote-proportion target) | 53.1 | Not recorded | 69cf49b30636e5bf4afcdb23 | | Model A (projection target) | 52.7 | Not recorded | 69cf49b30636e5bf4afcdb23 | | Model A (projection target) | 51.9 | Not recorded | 69cf49b30636e5bf4afcdb23 | | Model C (vote-proportion target) | 51.6 | Not recorded | 69cf49b30636e5bf4afcdb23 | | Model C (vote-proportion target) | 51.1 | Not recorded | 69cf49b30636e5bf4afcdb23 | | Model B (antipignistic target) | 50.8 | Not recorded | 69cf49b30636e5bf4afcdb23 | | Model B (antipignistic target) | 50.3 | Not recorded | 69cf49b30636e5bf4afcdb23 | | Model C (vote-proportion target) | 49.7 | Not recorded | 69cf49b30636e5bf4afcdb23 | | Model A (projection target) | 49.2 | Not recorded | 69cf49b30636e5bf4afcdb23 | | Model B (antipignistic target) | 46.4 | Not recorded | 69cf49b30636e5bf4afcdb23 | ### Model B (antipignistic target) Top-1 Accuracy: 62.4. Result ID: 69cf7fd147f34ce924b97de0. [Reporting paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Train section":"train\_full","Val section":"val\_S\_easy","Learning Rate":"0.007"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### Model A (projection target) Top-1 Accuracy: 61.7. Result ID: 69cf7fd147f34ce924b97ddf. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Train section":"train\_full","Val section":"val\_S\_easy","Learning Rate":"0.03"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### Model A (projection target) Top-1 Accuracy: 61.6. Result ID: 69cf7fd147f34ce924b97dd9. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Train section":"train\_full","Val section":"val\_full","Learning Rate":"0.007"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### Model A (projection target) Top-1 Accuracy: 61.3. Result ID: 69cf7fd147f34ce924b97deb. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Train section":"train\_S\_easy","Val section":"val\_full","Learning Rate":"0.005"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### Model C (vote-proportion target) Top-1 Accuracy: 60.8. Result ID: 69cf7fd147f34ce924b97ddb. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Train section":"train\_full","Val section":"val\_full","Learning Rate":"0.005"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### Model B (antipignistic target) Top-1 Accuracy: 60.4. Result ID: 69cf7fd147f34ce924b97dda. [Reporting paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Train section":"train\_full","Val section":"val\_full","Learning Rate":"0.007"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### Model C (vote-proportion target) Top-1 Accuracy: 60.4. Result ID: 69cf7fd147f34ce924b97de1. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Train section":"train\_full","Val section":"val\_S\_easy","Learning Rate":"0.08"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### Model C (vote-proportion target) Top-1 Accuracy: 59.3. Result ID: 69cf7fd147f34ce924b97ded. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Train section":"train\_S\_easy","Val section":"val\_full","Learning Rate":"0.2"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### Model C (vote-proportion target) Top-1 Accuracy: 58.9. Result ID: 69cf7fd147f34ce924b97df3. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Train section":"train\_S\_easy","Val section":"val\_S\_easy","Learning Rate":"0.3"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### Model B (antipignistic target) Top-1 Accuracy: 58.4. Result ID: 69cf7fd147f34ce924b97df2. [Reporting paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Train section":"train\_S\_easy","Val section":"val\_S\_easy","Learning Rate":"0.09"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### Model B (antipignistic target) Top-1 Accuracy: 57.5. Result ID: 69cf7fd147f34ce924b97dec. [Reporting paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Train section":"train\_S\_easy","Val section":"val\_full","Learning Rate":"0.1"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### Model A (projection target) Top-1 Accuracy: 57.3. Result ID: 69cf7fd147f34ce924b97df1. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Train section":"train\_S\_easy","Val section":"val\_S\_easy","Learning Rate":"0.2"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### Model A (projection target) Top-1 Accuracy: 57.1. Result ID: 69cf7fd147f34ce924b97dee. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Train section":"train\_S\_easy","Val section":"val\_S\_amb","Learning Rate":"0.08"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### Model B (antipignistic target) Top-1 Accuracy: 56. Result ID: 69cf7fd147f34ce924b97de9. [Reporting paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Train section":"train\_S\_amb","Val section":"val\_S\_easy","Learning Rate":"0.8"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### Model C (vote-proportion target) Top-1 Accuracy: 55.5. Result ID: 69cf7fd147f34ce924b97df0. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Train section":"train\_S\_easy","Val section":"val\_S\_amb","Learning Rate":"0.3"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### Model B (antipignistic target) Top-1 Accuracy: 54.1. Result ID: 69cf7fd147f34ce924b97de3. [Reporting paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Train section":"train\_S\_amb","Val section":"val\_full","Learning Rate":"0.6"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### Model A (projection target) Top-1 Accuracy: 53.2. Result ID: 69cf7fd147f34ce924b97de5. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Train section":"train\_S\_amb","Val section":"val\_S\_amb","Learning Rate":"0.009"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### Model C (vote-proportion target) Top-1 Accuracy: 53.1. Result ID: 69cf7fd147f34ce924b97dea. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Train section":"train\_S\_amb","Val section":"val\_S\_easy","Learning Rate":"0.5"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### Model A (projection target) Top-1 Accuracy: 52.7. Result ID: 69cf7fd147f34ce924b97de8. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Train section":"train\_S\_amb","Val section":"val\_S\_easy","Learning Rate":"0.01"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### Model A (projection target) Top-1 Accuracy: 51.9. Result ID: 69cf7fd147f34ce924b97de2. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Train section":"train\_S\_amb","Val section":"val\_full","Learning Rate":"0.009"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### Model C (vote-proportion target) Top-1 Accuracy: 51.6. Result ID: 69cf7fd147f34ce924b97dde. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Train section":"train\_full","Val section":"val\_S\_amb","Learning Rate":"0.0001"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### Model C (vote-proportion target) Top-1 Accuracy: 51.1. Result ID: 69cf7fd147f34ce924b97de4. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Train section":"train\_S\_amb","Val section":"val\_full","Learning Rate":"0.003"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### Model B (antipignistic target) Top-1 Accuracy: 50.8. Result ID: 69cf7fd147f34ce924b97def. [Reporting paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Train section":"train\_S\_easy","Val section":"val\_S\_amb","Learning Rate":"0.7"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### Model B (antipignistic target) Top-1 Accuracy: 50.3. Result ID: 69cf7fd147f34ce924b97ddd. [Reporting paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Train section":"train\_full","Val section":"val\_S\_amb","Learning Rate":"0.6"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### Model C (vote-proportion target) Top-1 Accuracy: 49.7. Result ID: 69cf7fd147f34ce924b97de7. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Train section":"train\_S\_amb","Val section":"val\_S\_amb","Learning Rate":"0.7"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### Model A (projection target) Top-1 Accuracy: 49.2. Result ID: 69cf7fd147f34ce924b97ddc. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Train section":"train\_full","Val section":"val\_S\_amb","Learning Rate":"0.5"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### Model B (antipignistic target) Top-1 Accuracy: 46.4. Result ID: 69cf7fd147f34ce924b97de6. [Reporting paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Train section":"train\_S\_amb","Val section":"val\_S\_amb","Learning Rate":"0.7"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. Page 1 of 1. This is an index page, not the full collection.