# Multimodal Controversy Detection on MMCD limited comments Source: [Multimodal Controversy Detection on MMCD limited comments]() Collection index: [llms.txt]() Data updated: 2026-05-06T07:05:01.215Z Evaluation of model performance on the MMCD limited comments dataset for Multimodal Controversy Detection, typically measured using standard classification metrics like Accuracy, F1, Precision, and Recall. A research result applies to its stated dataset, split, metric and evaluation configuration. Compare like-for-like settings, preserve the metric's unit and direction, and distinguish paper-reported results from independent reproduction. The best result recorded here is not a claim of exhaustive, current global coverage. | Scope | Recorded value | | --- | --- | | Task | Multimodal Controversy Detection | | Dataset (including any stated split) | MMCD limited comments | | Metric | F1 Score | | Unit | PERCENT | | Direction | Higher is better | | Results loaded | 14 of 14 | | Coverage | All results currently returned for this benchmark | Evaluation settings may differ between results. The original papers and recorded configurations are needed to establish comparability. A shared metric name alone does not establish an identical protocol. ## Metrics - [F1 Score](): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT. - [Recall](): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT. - [Precision](): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT. - [Accuracy](): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT. ## Recorded results | Method | F1 Score | Result date | Report paper | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | AuDisAgent | 68.29 | Not recorded | 69facae6c0f56ed84308a218 | | AgentMCD | 66.29 | Not recorded | 69facae6c0f56ed84308a218 | | Standard Prompting | 64.39 | Not recorded | 69facae6c0f56ed84308a218 | | Zero-shot CoT | 64.02 | Not recorded | 69facae6c0f56ed84308a218 | | Self-Reflect | 63.96 | Not recorded | 69facae6c0f56ed84308a218 | | Plan-and-Solve | 62.87 | Not recorded | 69facae6c0f56ed84308a218 | | MAD | 62.58 | Not recorded | 69facae6c0f56ed84308a218 | | Self-Refine | 61.78 | Not recorded | 69facae6c0f56ed84308a218 | | Self-Consistency | 61.75 | Not recorded | 69facae6c0f56ed84308a218 | | Tree of Thoughts (ToT) | 60.81 | Not recorded | 69facae6c0f56ed84308a218 | | Multi-Agent (Debate) | 60.46 | Not recorded | 69facae6c0f56ed84308a218 | | AutoAgents | 60.14 | Not recorded | 69facae6c0f56ed84308a218 | | Cumulative Reasoning (CR) | 58.22 | Not recorded | 69facae6c0f56ed84308a218 | | RECITE | 53.14 | Not recorded | 69facae6c0f56ed84308a218 | ### AuDisAgent F1 Score: 68.29. Result ID: 69fae78347f34ce924dd4fee. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Backbone LLM":"GLM4-9B"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### AgentMCD F1 Score: 66.29. Result ID: 69fae78347f34ce924dd4fed. [Reporting paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: Not recorded. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### Standard Prompting F1 Score: 64.39. Result ID: 69fae78347f34ce924dd4fe1. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: Not recorded. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### Zero-shot CoT F1 Score: 64.02. Result ID: 69fae78347f34ce924dd4fe2. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() [Implementation]() Recorded evaluation configuration: Not recorded. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### Self-Reflect F1 Score: 63.96. Result ID: 69fae78347f34ce924dd4fe5. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() [Implementation]() Recorded evaluation configuration: Not recorded. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### Plan-and-Solve F1 Score: 62.87. Result ID: 69fae78347f34ce924dd4fe3. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: Not recorded. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### MAD F1 Score: 62.58. Result ID: 69fae78347f34ce924dd4fec. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: Not recorded. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### Self-Refine F1 Score: 61.78. Result ID: 69fae78347f34ce924dd4fe6. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: Not recorded. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### Self-Consistency F1 Score: 61.75. Result ID: 69fae78347f34ce924dd4fe4. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: Not recorded. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### Tree of Thoughts (ToT) F1 Score: 60.81. Result ID: 69fae78347f34ce924dd4fe9. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() [Implementation]() Recorded evaluation configuration: Not recorded. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### Multi-Agent (Debate) F1 Score: 60.46. Result ID: 69fae78347f34ce924dd4feb. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: Not recorded. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### AutoAgents F1 Score: 60.14. Result ID: 69fae78347f34ce924dd4fea. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: Not recorded. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### Cumulative Reasoning (CR) F1 Score: 58.22. Result ID: 69fae78347f34ce924dd4fe7. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() [Implementation]() Recorded evaluation configuration: Not recorded. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### RECITE F1 Score: 53.14. Result ID: 69fae78347f34ce924dd4fe8. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: Not recorded. This record does not assert independent reproduction. Page 1 of 1. This is an index page, not the full collection.