# Multi-Reward Alignment on Parti-Prompts Source: [Multi-Reward Alignment on Parti-Prompts]() Collection index: [llms.txt]() Data updated: 2026-05-14T08:46:41.236Z Evaluation of image generation quality on the Parti-Prompts dataset using multiple reward signals, including CLIP, ICT, Aesthetic score, HPS, PickScore, ImgReward, and HP. A research result applies to its stated dataset, split, metric and evaluation configuration. Compare like-for-like settings, preserve the metric's unit and direction, and distinguish paper-reported results from independent reproduction. The best result recorded here is not a claim of exhaustive, current global coverage. | Scope | Recorded value | | --- | --- | | Task | Multi-Reward Alignment | | Dataset (including any stated split) | Parti-Prompts | | Metric | CLIP Score | | Unit | SCALAR | | Direction | Higher is better | | Results loaded | 16 of 16 | | Coverage | All results currently returned for this benchmark | Evaluation settings may differ between results. The original papers and recorded configurations are needed to establish comparability. A shared metric name alone does not establish an identical protocol. ## Metrics - [CLIP Score](): Higher is better; unit: SCALAR. - [ICT Score](): Higher is better; unit: SCALAR. - [Aesthetic Score](): Higher is better; unit: SCALAR. - [HPS Score](): Higher is better; unit: SCALAR. - [PickScore](): Higher is better; unit: SCALAR. - [ImgReward Score](): Higher is better; unit: SCALAR. - [HP Score](): Higher is better; unit: SCALAR. ## Recorded results | Method | CLIP Score | Result date | Report paper | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | CLIP | 0.3554 | Not recorded | 6a055740dbc836b87d828e6e | | Multi-Reward Joint Optimization | 0.3552 | Not recorded | 6a055740dbc836b87d828e6e | | Separate-Cons | 0.3549 | Not recorded | 6a055740dbc836b87d828e6e | | ICT | 0.3548 | Not recorded | 6a055740dbc836b87d828e6e | | Weighted-Sum | 0.3546 | Not recorded | 6a055740dbc836b87d828e6e | | Multi-Reward Joint Optimization | 0.3545 | Not recorded | 6a055740dbc836b87d828e6e | | Multi-Reward Joint Optimization | 0.3544 | Not recorded | 6a055740dbc836b87d828e6e | | Reward Soup | 0.3543 | Not recorded | 6a055740dbc836b87d828e6e | | Multi-Reward Joint Optimization | 0.3541 | Not recorded | 6a055740dbc836b87d828e6e | | Reward Soup | 0.3541 | Not recorded | 6a055740dbc836b87d828e6e | | Reward Soup | 0.3539 | Not recorded | 6a055740dbc836b87d828e6e | | HP | 0.3538 | Not recorded | 6a055740dbc836b87d828e6e | | Reward Soup | 0.3537 | Not recorded | 6a055740dbc836b87d828e6e | | PG-OT | 0.3534 | Not recorded | 6a055740dbc836b87d828e6e | | HPS | 0.3501 | Not recorded | 6a055740dbc836b87d828e6e | | SD3.5-Turbo | 0.3372 | Not recorded | 6a055740dbc836b87d828e6e | ### CLIP CLIP Score: 0.3554. Result ID: 6a058bdc47f34ce924eca48d. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() [Implementation]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Optimization Strategy":"Single-Reward Optimization"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### Multi-Reward Joint Optimization CLIP Score: 0.3552. Result ID: 6a058bdc47f34ce924eca491. [Reporting paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Optimization Strategy":"Weighted ICT:HP:CLIP:HPS ratios","Weight Ratios (ICT:HP:CLIP:HPS)":"2:2:3:3"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### Separate-Cons CLIP Score: 0.3549. Result ID: 6a058bdc47f34ce924eca498. [Reporting paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Optimization Strategy":"Multi-Reward under Heterogeneous Bounds (w/o OT)"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### ICT CLIP Score: 0.3548. Result ID: 6a058bdc47f34ce924eca48b. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Optimization Strategy":"Single-Reward Optimization"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### Weighted-Sum CLIP Score: 0.3546. Result ID: 6a058bdc47f34ce924eca497. [Reporting paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Optimization Strategy":"Multi-Reward under Heterogeneous Bounds (w/o OT)"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### Multi-Reward Joint Optimization CLIP Score: 0.3545. Result ID: 6a058bdc47f34ce924eca48f. [Reporting paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Optimization Strategy":"Weighted ICT:HP:CLIP:HPS ratios","Weight Ratios (ICT:HP:CLIP:HPS)":"1:1:1:1"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### Multi-Reward Joint Optimization CLIP Score: 0.3544. Result ID: 6a058bdc47f34ce924eca490. [Reporting paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Optimization Strategy":"Weighted ICT:HP:CLIP:HPS ratios","Weight Ratios (ICT:HP:CLIP:HPS)":"2:3:2:3"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### Reward Soup CLIP Score: 0.3543. Result ID: 6a058bdc47f34ce924eca493. [Reporting paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Optimization Strategy":"Weighted ICT:HP:CLIP:HPS fusion of single-reward LoRAs","Weight Ratios (ICT:HP:CLIP:HPS)":"1:1:1:1"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### Multi-Reward Joint Optimization CLIP Score: 0.3541. Result ID: 6a058bdc47f34ce924eca492. [Reporting paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Optimization Strategy":"Weighted ICT:HP:CLIP:HPS ratios","Weight Ratios (ICT:HP:CLIP:HPS)":"4:4:1:1"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### Reward Soup CLIP Score: 0.3541. Result ID: 6a058bdc47f34ce924eca496. [Reporting paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Optimization Strategy":"Weighted ICT:HP:CLIP:HPS fusion of single-reward LoRAs","Weight Ratios (ICT:HP:CLIP:HPS)":"3:2:0:0"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### Reward Soup CLIP Score: 0.3539. Result ID: 6a058bdc47f34ce924eca494. [Reporting paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Optimization Strategy":"Weighted ICT:HP:CLIP:HPS fusion of single-reward LoRAs","Weight Ratios (ICT:HP:CLIP:HPS)":"1:1:4:4"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### HP CLIP Score: 0.3538. Result ID: 6a058bdc47f34ce924eca48c. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Optimization Strategy":"Single-Reward Optimization"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### Reward Soup CLIP Score: 0.3537. Result ID: 6a058bdc47f34ce924eca495. [Reporting paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Optimization Strategy":"Weighted ICT:HP:CLIP:HPS fusion of single-reward LoRAs","Weight Ratios (ICT:HP:CLIP:HPS)":"3:2:1:4"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### PG-OT CLIP Score: 0.3534. Result ID: 6a058bdc47f34ce924eca499. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Optimization Strategy":"Pareto-Frontier-Guided Optimal Transport"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### HPS CLIP Score: 0.3501. Result ID: 6a058bdc47f34ce924eca48e. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Optimization Strategy":"Single-Reward Optimization"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### SD3.5-Turbo CLIP Score: 0.3372. Result ID: 6a058bdc47f34ce924eca48a. [Reporting paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: Not recorded. This record does not assert independent reproduction. Page 1 of 1. This is an index page, not the full collection.