# Multi-agent Micromanagement on SMAC 3m

Source: [Multi-agent Micromanagement on SMAC 3m](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/multi-agent-micromanagement-on-smac-3m>)

Collection index: [llms.txt](<https://www.sota2.com/research/llms.txt>)

Data updated: 2026-03-26T13:47:28.334Z

Evaluation of Multi-agent Micromanagement performance on the SMAC 3m map configuration.

A research result applies to its stated dataset, split, metric and evaluation configuration. Compare like-for-like settings, preserve the metric's unit and direction, and distinguish paper-reported results from independent reproduction. The best result recorded here is not a claim of exhaustive, current global coverage.

| Scope | Recorded value |
| --- | --- |
| Task | Real-time micro-management |
| Dataset (including any stated split) | SMAC 3m |
| Metric | Win Rate |
| Unit | PERCENT |
| Direction | Higher is better |
| Results loaded | 6 of 6 |
| Coverage | All results currently returned for this benchmark |

Evaluation settings may differ between results. The original papers and recorded configurations are needed to establish comparability. A shared metric name alone does not establish an identical protocol.

## Metrics

- [Win Rate](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/multi-agent-micromanagement-on-smac-3m.md?metric=Win%20Rate>): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT.

- [Average Episode Time (s)](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/multi-agent-micromanagement-on-smac-3m.md?metric=Average%20Episode%20Time%20(s)>): Lower is better; unit: TIME.

## Recorded results

| Method | Win Rate | Result date | Report paper |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| SEMA | 88 | Not recorded | 69c4bd7c0636e5bf4afc756b |
| HIMA | 66 | Not recorded | 69c4bd7c0636e5bf4afc756b |
| TextStarCraft | 56 | Not recorded | 69c4bd7c0636e5bf4afc756b |
| Rule-Based | 50 | Not recorded | 69c4bd7c0636e5bf4afc756b |
| Single-LLM | 40 | Not recorded | 69c4bd7c0636e5bf4afc756b |
| Random | 2 | Not recorded | 69c4bd7c0636e5bf4afc756b |

### SEMA

Win Rate: 88. Result ID: 69c5380947f34ce924aedd50.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/69c4bd7c0636e5bf4afc756b.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/69c4bd7c0636e5bf4afc756b.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: Not recorded. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### HIMA

Win Rate: 66. Result ID: 69c5380947f34ce924aedd4f.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/69c4bd7c0636e5bf4afc756b.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa7a871e209131cea83b75.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: Not recorded. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### TextStarCraft

Win Rate: 56. Result ID: 69c5380947f34ce924aedd4e.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/69c4bd7c0636e5bf4afc756b.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa6eb61e209131cea41b33.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: Not recorded. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### Rule-Based

Win Rate: 50. Result ID: 69c5380947f34ce924aedd4c.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/69c4bd7c0636e5bf4afc756b.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: Not recorded. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### Single-LLM

Win Rate: 40. Result ID: 69c5380947f34ce924aedd4d.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/69c4bd7c0636e5bf4afc756b.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: Not recorded. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### Random

Win Rate: 2. Result ID: 69c5380947f34ce924aedd4b.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/69c4bd7c0636e5bf4afc756b.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: Not recorded. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

Page 1 of 1. This is an index page, not the full collection.