# Multi-agent contract design on MB-MA Contracts (Binary Effort Model) Source: [Multi-agent contract design on MB-MA Contracts (Binary Effort Model)]() Collection index: [llms.txt]() Data updated: 2026-04-10T08:40:09.182Z Evaluation of approximation schemes (FPTAS, EPTAS, PTAS) for multi-agent contract design problems under multi-budgeted constraints, specifically using the binary-effort model. A research result applies to its stated dataset, split, metric and evaluation configuration. Compare like-for-like settings, preserve the metric's unit and direction, and distinguish paper-reported results from independent reproduction. The best result recorded here is not a claim of exhaustive, current global coverage. | Scope | Recorded value | | --- | --- | | Task | Multi-agent contract design | | Dataset (including any stated split) | Multi-Budgeted (MB-MA) multi-agent contracts binary-effort model | | Metric | EPTAS Result | | Unit | PERCENT | | Direction | Higher is better | | Results loaded | 1 of 1 | | Coverage | All results currently returned for this benchmark | Evaluation settings may differ between results. The original papers and recorded configurations are needed to establish comparability. A shared metric name alone does not establish an identical protocol. ## Metrics - [EPTAS Result](): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT. - [FPTAS Result](): Higher is better; unit: SCALAR. - [PTAS Result](): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT. ## Recorded results | Method | EPTAS Result | Result date | Report paper | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | local-to-global framework | 90 | Not recorded | 68fa7a341e209131cea81bdf | ### local-to-global framework EPTAS Result: 90. Result ID: 69d8b76447f34ce924c1a05c. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"constraint":"Multi-Budgeted"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. Page 1 of 1. This is an index page, not the full collection.