# Multi-agent contract design on Budgeted (B-MA) multi-agent contracts binary-effort model Source: [Multi-agent contract design on Budgeted (B-MA) multi-agent contracts binary-effort model]() Collection index: [llms.txt]() Data updated: 2026-04-10T08:40:09.161Z Evaluation of approximation schemes (FPTAS, EPTAS, PTAS) for multi-agent contract design problems using the Budgeted (B-MA) binary-effort model. A research result applies to its stated dataset, split, metric and evaluation configuration. Compare like-for-like settings, preserve the metric's unit and direction, and distinguish paper-reported results from independent reproduction. The best result recorded here is not a claim of exhaustive, current global coverage. | Scope | Recorded value | | --- | --- | | Task | Multi-agent contract design | | Dataset (including any stated split) | Budgeted (B-MA) multi-agent contracts binary-effort model | | Metric | FPTAS Performance | | Unit | SCALAR | | Direction | Higher is better | | Results loaded | 1 of 1 | | Coverage | All results currently returned for this benchmark | Evaluation settings may differ between results. The original papers and recorded configurations are needed to establish comparability. A shared metric name alone does not establish an identical protocol. ## Metrics - [FPTAS Performance](): Higher is better; unit: SCALAR. - [EPTAS Performance](): Higher is better; unit: SCALAR. - [PTAS Performance](): Higher is better; unit: SCALAR. ## Recorded results | Method | FPTAS Performance | Result date | Report paper | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | local-to-global framework | 0.6 | Not recorded | 68fa7a341e209131cea81bdf | ### local-to-global framework FPTAS Performance: 0.6. Result ID: 69d8b76447f34ce924c1a05b. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"constraint":"Budgeted"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. Page 1 of 1. This is an index page, not the full collection.