# Motor Imagery Decoding on Dataset II (cross-subject) Source: [Motor Imagery Decoding on Dataset II (cross-subject)]() Collection index: [llms.txt]() Data updated: 2026-03-26T15:18:01.471Z Evaluation of Motor Imagery Decoding performance using the cross-subject split of Dataset II, reporting subject-specific results (S1-S10), overall average accuracy, and Kappa coefficient. A research result applies to its stated dataset, split, metric and evaluation configuration. Compare like-for-like settings, preserve the metric's unit and direction, and distinguish paper-reported results from independent reproduction. The best result recorded here is not a claim of exhaustive, current global coverage. | Scope | Recorded value | | --- | --- | | Task | Motor Imagery Decoding | | Dataset (including any stated split) | Dataset II (cross-subject) | | Metric | Subject Accuracy (S1) | | Unit | PERCENT | | Direction | Higher is better | | Results loaded | 11 of 11 | | Coverage | All results currently returned for this benchmark | Evaluation settings may differ between results. The original papers and recorded configurations are needed to establish comparability. A shared metric name alone does not establish an identical protocol. ## Metrics - [Subject Accuracy (S1)](): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT. - [Subject Accuracy (S2)](): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT. - [Subject Accuracy (S3)](): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT. - [Subject Accuracy (S4)](): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT. - [Subject Accuracy (S5)](): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT. - [Subject Accuracy (S6)](): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT. - [Subject Accuracy (S7)](): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT. - [Subject Accuracy (S8)](): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT. - [Subject Accuracy (S9)](): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT. - [Subject Accuracy (S10)](): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT. - [Average Accuracy](): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT. - [Kappa Coefficient](): Higher is better; unit: SCALAR. ## Recorded results | Method | Subject Accuracy (S1) | Result date | Report paper | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | BFM-MSDA | 80.52 | Not recorded | 68fa7a4b1e209131cea8244a | | ASJDA | 79.03 | Not recorded | 68fa7a4b1e209131cea8244a | | DJDAN | 78.36 | Not recorded | 68fa7a4b1e209131cea8244a | | JAN | 78.27 | Not recorded | 68fa7a4b1e209131cea8244a | | Conformer | 77.62 | Not recorded | 68fa7a4b1e209131cea8244a | | DJP-MMD | 76.31 | Not recorded | 68fa7a4b1e209131cea8244a | | GAT | 76.25 | Not recorded | 68fa7a4b1e209131cea8244a | | ShallowConvNet | 73.92 | Not recorded | 68fa7a4b1e209131cea8244a | | EEGNet | 66.57 | Not recorded | 68fa7a4b1e209131cea8244a | | CBraMod w/ Linear | 61.37 | Not recorded | 68fa7a4b1e209131cea8244a | | LaBraM w/ Linear | 56.72 | Not recorded | 68fa7a4b1e209131cea8244a | ### BFM-MSDA Subject Accuracy (S1): 80.52. Result ID: 69c54d9247f34ce924af7ad2. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Evaluation Protocol":"Cross-subject"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### ASJDA Subject Accuracy (S1): 79.03. Result ID: 69c54d9247f34ce924af7ace. [Reporting paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Evaluation Protocol":"Cross-subject"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### DJDAN Subject Accuracy (S1): 78.36. Result ID: 69c54d9247f34ce924af7acf. [Reporting paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Evaluation Protocol":"Cross-subject"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### JAN Subject Accuracy (S1): 78.27. Result ID: 69c54d9247f34ce924af7acb. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() [Implementation]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Evaluation Protocol":"Cross-subject"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### Conformer Subject Accuracy (S1): 77.62. Result ID: 69c54d9247f34ce924af7aca. [Reporting paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Evaluation Protocol":"Cross-subject"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### DJP-MMD Subject Accuracy (S1): 76.31. Result ID: 69c54d9247f34ce924af7acc. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Evaluation Protocol":"Cross-subject"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### GAT Subject Accuracy (S1): 76.25. Result ID: 69c54d9247f34ce924af7acd. [Reporting paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Evaluation Protocol":"Cross-subject"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### ShallowConvNet Subject Accuracy (S1): 73.92. Result ID: 69c54d9247f34ce924af7ac9. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Evaluation Protocol":"Cross-subject"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### EEGNet Subject Accuracy (S1): 66.57. Result ID: 69c54d9247f34ce924af7ac8. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Evaluation Protocol":"Cross-subject"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### CBraMod w/ Linear Subject Accuracy (S1): 61.37. Result ID: 69c54d9247f34ce924af7ad1. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Evaluation Protocol":"Cross-subject"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### LaBraM w/ Linear Subject Accuracy (S1): 56.72. Result ID: 69c54d9247f34ce924af7ad0. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Evaluation Protocol":"Cross-subject"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. Page 1 of 1. This is an index page, not the full collection.