# Motor Imagery Decoding on BCI Competition IV 2a I (cross-subject)

Source: [Motor Imagery Decoding on BCI Competition IV 2a I (cross-subject)](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/motor-imagery-decoding-on-bci-competition-iv-2a-i-cross-subject>)

Collection index: [llms.txt](<https://www.sota2.com/research/llms.txt>)

Data updated: 2026-06-02T12:22:10.198Z

Evaluation of Motor Imagery Decoding performance on the BCI Competition IV Dataset 2a, specifically using the cross-subject protocol (Set I), reporting per-class accuracies and Kappa statistics.

A research result applies to its stated dataset, split, metric and evaluation configuration. Compare like-for-like settings, preserve the metric's unit and direction, and distinguish paper-reported results from independent reproduction. The best result recorded here is not a claim of exhaustive, current global coverage.

| Scope | Recorded value |
| --- | --- |
| Task | Motor Imagery Decoding |
| Dataset (including any stated split) | BCI Competition IV 2a I (cross-subject) |
| Metric | Average Accuracy |
| Unit | PERCENT |
| Direction | Higher is better |
| Results loaded | 17 of 17 |
| Coverage | All results currently returned for this benchmark |

Evaluation settings may differ between results. The original papers and recorded configurations are needed to establish comparability. A shared metric name alone does not establish an identical protocol.

## Metrics

- [Average Accuracy](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/motor-imagery-decoding-on-bci-competition-iv-2a-i-cross-subject.md?metric=Average%20Accuracy>): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT.

- [Accuracy Class 1](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/motor-imagery-decoding-on-bci-competition-iv-2a-i-cross-subject.md?metric=Accuracy%20Class%201>): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT.

- [Accuracy Class 2](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/motor-imagery-decoding-on-bci-competition-iv-2a-i-cross-subject.md?metric=Accuracy%20Class%202>): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT.

- [Accuracy Class 3](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/motor-imagery-decoding-on-bci-competition-iv-2a-i-cross-subject.md?metric=Accuracy%20Class%203>): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT.

- [Accuracy Class 4](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/motor-imagery-decoding-on-bci-competition-iv-2a-i-cross-subject.md?metric=Accuracy%20Class%204>): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT.

- [Accuracy Class 5](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/motor-imagery-decoding-on-bci-competition-iv-2a-i-cross-subject.md?metric=Accuracy%20Class%205>): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT.

- [Accuracy Class 6](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/motor-imagery-decoding-on-bci-competition-iv-2a-i-cross-subject.md?metric=Accuracy%20Class%206>): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT.

- [Accuracy Class 7](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/motor-imagery-decoding-on-bci-competition-iv-2a-i-cross-subject.md?metric=Accuracy%20Class%207>): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT.

- [Accuracy Class 8](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/motor-imagery-decoding-on-bci-competition-iv-2a-i-cross-subject.md?metric=Accuracy%20Class%208>): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT.

- [Accuracy Class 9](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/motor-imagery-decoding-on-bci-competition-iv-2a-i-cross-subject.md?metric=Accuracy%20Class%209>): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT.

- [Kappa Statistic](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/motor-imagery-decoding-on-bci-competition-iv-2a-i-cross-subject.md?metric=Kappa%20Statistic>): Higher is better; unit: SCALAR.

## Recorded results

| Method | Average Accuracy | Result date | Report paper |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| BFM-MSDA | 86.17 | Not recorded | 68fa7a4b1e209131cea8244a |
| DJDAN | 84.18 | Not recorded | 68fa7a4b1e209131cea8244a |
| DJP-MMD | 84.11 | Not recorded | 68fa7a4b1e209131cea8244a |
| GAT | 83.81 | Not recorded | 68fa7a4b1e209131cea8244a |
| JAN | 83.21 | Not recorded | 68fa7a4b1e209131cea8244a |
| ASJDA | 83.02 | Not recorded | 68fa7a4b1e209131cea8244a |
| Conformer | 80.75 | Not recorded | 68fa7a4b1e209131cea8244a |
| ShallowConvNet | 80.15 | Not recorded | 68fa7a4b1e209131cea8244a |
| EEGNet | 77.93 | Not recorded | 68fa7a4b1e209131cea8244a |
| EVA-Net | 71.25 | Not recorded | 6a1e643bdbd7150506f858a6 |
| CBraMod w/ Linear | 67.92 | Not recorded | 68fa7a4b1e209131cea8244a |
| EEGCCT | 67.9 | Not recorded | 6a1e643bdbd7150506f858a6 |
| LaBraM w/ Linear | 64.77 | Not recorded | 68fa7a4b1e209131cea8244a |
| MSVTNet | 64.1 | Not recorded | 6a1e643bdbd7150506f858a6 |
| EEGNet | 63.44 | Not recorded | 6a1e643bdbd7150506f858a6 |
| EEG Conformer | 60.7 | Not recorded | 6a1e643bdbd7150506f858a6 |
| ShallowConvNet | 59.43 | Not recorded | 6a1e643bdbd7150506f858a6 |

### BFM-MSDA

Average Accuracy: 86.17. Result ID: 69c54d9247f34ce924af7ac7.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa7a4b1e209131cea8244a.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa7a4b1e209131cea8244a.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Evaluation Protocol":"Cross-subject"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### DJDAN

Average Accuracy: 84.18. Result ID: 69c54d9247f34ce924af7ac4.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa7a4b1e209131cea8244a.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Evaluation Protocol":"Cross-subject"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### DJP-MMD

Average Accuracy: 84.11. Result ID: 69c54d9247f34ce924af7ac1.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa7a4b1e209131cea8244a.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa67541e209131cea15844.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Evaluation Protocol":"Cross-subject"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### GAT

Average Accuracy: 83.81. Result ID: 69c54d9247f34ce924af7ac2.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa7a4b1e209131cea8244a.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Evaluation Protocol":"Cross-subject"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### JAN

Average Accuracy: 83.21. Result ID: 69c54d9247f34ce924af7ac0.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa7a4b1e209131cea8244a.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa639b1e209131ce9ff992.md>)

[Implementation](<http://github.com/thuml>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Evaluation Protocol":"Cross-subject"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### ASJDA

Average Accuracy: 83.02. Result ID: 69c54d9247f34ce924af7ac3.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa7a4b1e209131cea8244a.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Evaluation Protocol":"Cross-subject"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### Conformer

Average Accuracy: 80.75. Result ID: 69c54d9247f34ce924af7abf.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa7a4b1e209131cea8244a.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Evaluation Protocol":"Cross-subject"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### ShallowConvNet

Average Accuracy: 80.15. Result ID: 69c54d9247f34ce924af7abe.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa7a4b1e209131cea8244a.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa647b1e209131cea04b1b.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Evaluation Protocol":"Cross-subject"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### EEGNet

Average Accuracy: 77.93. Result ID: 69c54d9247f34ce924af7abd.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa7a4b1e209131cea8244a.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa5ee01e209131ce9e5f5a.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Evaluation Protocol":"Cross-subject"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### EVA-Net

Average Accuracy: 71.25. Result ID: 6a1ecae0fbc373592c1a6c95.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/6a1e643bdbd7150506f858a6.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/6a1e643bdbd7150506f858a6.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Setting":"subject-independent"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### CBraMod w/ Linear

Average Accuracy: 67.92. Result ID: 69c54d9247f34ce924af7ac6.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa7a4b1e209131cea8244a.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa5f761e209131ce9ea2b6.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Evaluation Protocol":"Cross-subject"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### EEGCCT

Average Accuracy: 67.9. Result ID: 6a1ecae0fbc373592c1a6c92.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/6a1e643bdbd7150506f858a6.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Setting":"subject-independent"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### LaBraM w/ Linear

Average Accuracy: 64.77. Result ID: 69c54d9247f34ce924af7ac5.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa7a4b1e209131cea8244a.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa73711e209131cea5c83d.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Evaluation Protocol":"Cross-subject"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### MSVTNet

Average Accuracy: 64.1. Result ID: 6a1ecae0fbc373592c1a6c94.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/6a1e643bdbd7150506f858a6.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Setting":"subject-independent"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### EEGNet

Average Accuracy: 63.44. Result ID: 6a1ecae0fbc373592c1a6c90.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/6a1e643bdbd7150506f858a6.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa5ee01e209131ce9e5f5a.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Setting":"subject-independent"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### EEG Conformer

Average Accuracy: 60.7. Result ID: 6a1ecae0fbc373592c1a6c93.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/6a1e643bdbd7150506f858a6.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Setting":"subject-independent"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### ShallowConvNet

Average Accuracy: 59.43. Result ID: 6a1ecae0fbc373592c1a6c91.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/6a1e643bdbd7150506f858a6.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Setting":"subject-independent"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

Page 1 of 1. This is an index page, not the full collection.
