# Model Ranking Correlation Analysis on MathVista Source: [Model Ranking Correlation Analysis on MathVista]() Collection index: [llms.txt]() Data updated: 2026-03-04T19:39:18.111Z Evaluation of model ranking correlation performance on the MathVista dataset, specifically analyzing Spearman's rank correlation across various subset sizes (10% to 50%). A research result applies to its stated dataset, split, metric and evaluation configuration. Compare like-for-like settings, preserve the metric's unit and direction, and distinguish paper-reported results from independent reproduction. The best result recorded here is not a claim of exhaustive, current global coverage. | Scope | Recorded value | | --- | --- | | Task | Model Ranking Correlation Analysis | | Dataset (including any stated split) | MathVista | | Metric | Spearman Correlation (10% subset) | | Unit | SCALAR | | Direction | Higher is better | | Results loaded | 7 of 7 | | Coverage | All results currently returned for this benchmark | Evaluation settings may differ between results. The original papers and recorded configurations are needed to establish comparability. A shared metric name alone does not establish an identical protocol. ## Metrics - [Spearman Correlation (10% subset)](): Higher is better; unit: SCALAR. - [Spearman Correlation (20% subset)](): Higher is better; unit: SCALAR. - [Spearman Correlation (30% subset)](): Higher is better; unit: SCALAR. - [Spearman Correlation (40% subset)](): Higher is better; unit: SCALAR. - [Spearman Correlation (50% subset)](): Higher is better; unit: SCALAR. ## Recorded results | Method | Spearman Correlation (10% subset) | Result date | Report paper | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | M3IRT | 0.92 | Not recorded | 69a7bc9a2d603e6de3e3d6a5 | | FlashEval | 0.89 | Not recorded | 69a7bc9a2d603e6de3e3d6a5 | | Random | 0.89 | Not recorded | 69a7bc9a2d603e6de3e3d6a5 | | M2IRT | 0.81 | Not recorded | 69a7bc9a2d603e6de3e3d6a5 | | IRT | 0.81 | Not recorded | 69a7bc9a2d603e6de3e3d6a5 | | TinyBenchmarks | 0.79 | Not recorded | 69a7bc9a2d603e6de3e3d6a5 | | MIRT | 0.58 | Not recorded | 69a7bc9a2d603e6de3e3d6a5 | ### M3IRT Spearman Correlation (10% subset): 0.92. Result ID: 69a88a4a6dbb7075b9510e1f. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: Not recorded. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### FlashEval Spearman Correlation (10% subset): 0.89. Result ID: 69a88a4a6dbb7075b9510e23. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: Not recorded. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### Random Spearman Correlation (10% subset): 0.89. Result ID: 69a88a4a6dbb7075b9510e24. [Reporting paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: Not recorded. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### M2IRT Spearman Correlation (10% subset): 0.81. Result ID: 69a88a4a6dbb7075b9510e1e. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: Not recorded. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### IRT Spearman Correlation (10% subset): 0.81. Result ID: 69a88a4a6dbb7075b9510e20. [Reporting paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: Not recorded. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### TinyBenchmarks Spearman Correlation (10% subset): 0.79. Result ID: 69a88a4a6dbb7075b9510e22. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: Not recorded. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### MIRT Spearman Correlation (10% subset): 0.58. Result ID: 69a88a4a6dbb7075b9510e21. [Reporting paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: Not recorded. This record does not assert independent reproduction. Page 1 of 1. This is an index page, not the full collection.