# Model Inversion Attack Defense on CIFAR100 (val)

Source: [Model Inversion Attack Defense on CIFAR100 (val)](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/model-inversion-attack-defense-on-cifar100-val>)

Collection index: [llms.txt](<https://www.sota2.com/research/llms.txt>)

Data updated: 2026-02-26T06:03:24.568Z

Evaluation of defense mechanisms against Model Inversion Attacks performed on the CIFAR-100 validation set, measured using reconstruction fidelity metrics like SSIM and PSNR.

A research result applies to its stated dataset, split, metric and evaluation configuration. Compare like-for-like settings, preserve the metric's unit and direction, and distinguish paper-reported results from independent reproduction. The best result recorded here is not a claim of exhaustive, current global coverage.

| Scope | Recorded value |
| --- | --- |
| Task | Model Inversion Attack Defense |
| Dataset (including any stated split) | CIFAR100 (val) |
| Metric | SSIM |
| Unit | SCALAR |
| Direction | Higher is better |
| Results loaded | 28 of 28 |
| Coverage | All results currently returned for this benchmark |

Evaluation settings may differ between results. The original papers and recorded configurations are needed to establish comparability. A shared metric name alone does not establish an identical protocol.

## Metrics

- [SSIM](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/model-inversion-attack-defense-on-cifar100-val.md?metric=SSIM>): Higher is better; unit: SCALAR.

- [PSNR](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/model-inversion-attack-defense-on-cifar100-val.md?metric=PSNR>): Higher is better; unit: SCALAR.

## Recorded results

| Method | SSIM | Result date | Report paper |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Bottleneck | 0.975 | Not recorded | 68fa77c91e209131cea7556d |
| Bottleneck | 0.97 | Not recorded | 68fa77c91e209131cea7556d |
| Bottleneck+CEM | 0.937 | Not recorded | 68fa77c91e209131cea7556d |
| Dropout | 0.936 | Not recorded | 68fa77c91e209131cea7556d |
| ResSFL | 0.935 | Not recorded | 68fa77c91e209131cea7556d |
| DistCorr | 0.928 | Not recorded | 68fa77c91e209131cea7556d |
| Dropout+CEM | 0.89 | Not recorded | 68fa77c91e209131cea7556d |
| Noise\_Nopeek | 0.89 | Not recorded | 68fa77c91e209131cea7556d |
| DistCorr | 0.88 | Not recorded | 68fa77c91e209131cea7556d |
| DistCorr+CEM | 0.877 | Not recorded | 68fa77c91e209131cea7556d |
| ResSFL | 0.866 | Not recorded | 68fa77c91e209131cea7556d |
| ResSFL+CEM | 0.866 | Not recorded | 68fa77c91e209131cea7556d |
| Dropout | 0.865 | Not recorded | 68fa77c91e209131cea7556d |
| Noise\_Nopeek+CEM | 0.858 | Not recorded | 68fa77c91e209131cea7556d |
| Bottleneck+CEM | 0.856 | Not recorded | 68fa77c91e209131cea7556d |
| Noise\_Nopeek | 0.841 | Not recorded | 68fa77c91e209131cea7556d |
| Dropout+CEM | 0.816 | Not recorded | 68fa77c91e209131cea7556d |
| DistCorr+CEM | 0.812 | Not recorded | 68fa77c91e209131cea7556d |
| Noise\_Nopeek+CEM | 0.797 | Not recorded | 68fa77c91e209131cea7556d |
| ResSFL+CEM | 0.77 | Not recorded | 68fa77c91e209131cea7556d |
| Noise\_ARL | 0.691 | Not recorded | 68fa77c91e209131cea7556d |
| PATROL | 0.634 | Not recorded | 68fa77c91e209131cea7556d |
| PATROL+CEM | 0.603 | Not recorded | 68fa77c91e209131cea7556d |
| Noise\_ARL+CEM | 0.599 | Not recorded | 68fa77c91e209131cea7556d |
| Noise\_ARL | 0.521 | Not recorded | 68fa77c91e209131cea7556d |
| PATROL | 0.478 | Not recorded | 68fa77c91e209131cea7556d |
| Noise\_ARL+CEM | 0.457 | Not recorded | 68fa77c91e209131cea7556d |
| PATROL+CEM | 0.44 | Not recorded | 68fa77c91e209131cea7556d |

### Bottleneck

SSIM: 0.975. Result ID: 699569f43badfaffe65de5b6.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa77c91e209131cea7556d.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa77c91e209131cea7556d.md>)

[Implementation](<https://github.com/xiasong0501/CEM>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Attack Method":"Dec.-based MIA \[29\]"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### Bottleneck

SSIM: 0.97. Result ID: 699569f43badfaffe65de5c4.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa77c91e209131cea7556d.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa77c91e209131cea7556d.md>)

[Implementation](<https://github.com/xiasong0501/CEM>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Attack Method":"GAN-based MIA \[68\]"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### Bottleneck+CEM

SSIM: 0.937. Result ID: 699569f43badfaffe65de5c5.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa77c91e209131cea7556d.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa77c91e209131cea7556d.md>)

[Implementation](<https://github.com/xiasong0501/CEM>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Attack Method":"GAN-based MIA \[68\]"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### Dropout

SSIM: 0.936. Result ID: 699569f43badfaffe65de5c8.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa77c91e209131cea7556d.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa77c91e209131cea7556d.md>)

[Implementation](<https://github.com/xiasong0501/CEM>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Attack Method":"GAN-based MIA \[68\]"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### ResSFL

SSIM: 0.935. Result ID: 699569f43badfaffe65de5cc.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa77c91e209131cea7556d.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa77c91e209131cea7556d.md>)

[Implementation](<https://github.com/xiasong0501/CEM>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Attack Method":"GAN-based MIA \[68\]"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### DistCorr

SSIM: 0.928. Result ID: 699569f43badfaffe65de5c6.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa77c91e209131cea7556d.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa77c91e209131cea7556d.md>)

[Implementation](<https://github.com/xiasong0501/CEM>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Attack Method":"GAN-based MIA \[68\]"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### Dropout+CEM

SSIM: 0.89. Result ID: 699569f43badfaffe65de5c9.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa77c91e209131cea7556d.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa77c91e209131cea7556d.md>)

[Implementation](<https://github.com/xiasong0501/CEM>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Attack Method":"GAN-based MIA \[68\]"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### Noise\_Nopeek

SSIM: 0.89. Result ID: 699569f43badfaffe65de5ce.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa77c91e209131cea7556d.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa77c91e209131cea7556d.md>)

[Implementation](<https://github.com/xiasong0501/CEM>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Attack Method":"GAN-based MIA \[68\]"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### DistCorr

SSIM: 0.88. Result ID: 699569f43badfaffe65de5b8.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa77c91e209131cea7556d.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa77c91e209131cea7556d.md>)

[Implementation](<https://github.com/xiasong0501/CEM>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Attack Method":"Dec.-based MIA \[29\]"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### DistCorr+CEM

SSIM: 0.877. Result ID: 699569f43badfaffe65de5c7.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa77c91e209131cea7556d.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa77c91e209131cea7556d.md>)

[Implementation](<https://github.com/xiasong0501/CEM>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Attack Method":"GAN-based MIA \[68\]"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### ResSFL

SSIM: 0.866. Result ID: 699569f43badfaffe65de5be.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa77c91e209131cea7556d.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa77c91e209131cea7556d.md>)

[Implementation](<https://github.com/xiasong0501/CEM>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Attack Method":"Dec.-based MIA \[29\]"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### ResSFL+CEM

SSIM: 0.866. Result ID: 699569f43badfaffe65de5cd.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa77c91e209131cea7556d.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa77c91e209131cea7556d.md>)

[Implementation](<https://github.com/xiasong0501/CEM>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Attack Method":"GAN-based MIA \[68\]"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### Dropout

SSIM: 0.865. Result ID: 699569f43badfaffe65de5ba.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa77c91e209131cea7556d.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa77c91e209131cea7556d.md>)

[Implementation](<https://github.com/xiasong0501/CEM>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Attack Method":"Dec.-based MIA \[29\]"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### Noise\_Nopeek+CEM

SSIM: 0.858. Result ID: 699569f43badfaffe65de5cf.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa77c91e209131cea7556d.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa77c91e209131cea7556d.md>)

[Implementation](<https://github.com/xiasong0501/CEM>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Attack Method":"GAN-based MIA \[68\]"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### Bottleneck+CEM

SSIM: 0.856. Result ID: 699569f43badfaffe65de5b7.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa77c91e209131cea7556d.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa77c91e209131cea7556d.md>)

[Implementation](<https://github.com/xiasong0501/CEM>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Attack Method":"Dec.-based MIA \[29\]"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### Noise\_Nopeek

SSIM: 0.841. Result ID: 699569f43badfaffe65de5c0.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa77c91e209131cea7556d.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa77c91e209131cea7556d.md>)

[Implementation](<https://github.com/xiasong0501/CEM>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Attack Method":"Dec.-based MIA \[29\]"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### Dropout+CEM

SSIM: 0.816. Result ID: 699569f43badfaffe65de5bb.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa77c91e209131cea7556d.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa77c91e209131cea7556d.md>)

[Implementation](<https://github.com/xiasong0501/CEM>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Attack Method":"Dec.-based MIA \[29\]"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### DistCorr+CEM

SSIM: 0.812. Result ID: 699569f43badfaffe65de5b9.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa77c91e209131cea7556d.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa77c91e209131cea7556d.md>)

[Implementation](<https://github.com/xiasong0501/CEM>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Attack Method":"Dec.-based MIA \[29\]"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### Noise\_Nopeek+CEM

SSIM: 0.797. Result ID: 699569f43badfaffe65de5c1.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa77c91e209131cea7556d.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa77c91e209131cea7556d.md>)

[Implementation](<https://github.com/xiasong0501/CEM>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Attack Method":"Dec.-based MIA \[29\]"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### ResSFL+CEM

SSIM: 0.77. Result ID: 699569f43badfaffe65de5bf.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa77c91e209131cea7556d.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa77c91e209131cea7556d.md>)

[Implementation](<https://github.com/xiasong0501/CEM>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Attack Method":"Dec.-based MIA \[29\]"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### Noise\_ARL

SSIM: 0.691. Result ID: 699569f43badfaffe65de5d0.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa77c91e209131cea7556d.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa77c91e209131cea7556d.md>)

[Implementation](<https://github.com/xiasong0501/CEM>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Attack Method":"GAN-based MIA \[68\]"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### PATROL

SSIM: 0.634. Result ID: 699569f43badfaffe65de5ca.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa77c91e209131cea7556d.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa77c91e209131cea7556d.md>)

[Implementation](<https://github.com/xiasong0501/CEM>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Attack Method":"GAN-based MIA \[68\]"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### PATROL+CEM

SSIM: 0.603. Result ID: 699569f43badfaffe65de5cb.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa77c91e209131cea7556d.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa77c91e209131cea7556d.md>)

[Implementation](<https://github.com/xiasong0501/CEM>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Attack Method":"GAN-based MIA \[68\]"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### Noise\_ARL+CEM

SSIM: 0.599. Result ID: 699569f43badfaffe65de5d1.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa77c91e209131cea7556d.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa77c91e209131cea7556d.md>)

[Implementation](<https://github.com/xiasong0501/CEM>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Attack Method":"GAN-based MIA \[68\]"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### Noise\_ARL

SSIM: 0.521. Result ID: 699569f43badfaffe65de5c2.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa77c91e209131cea7556d.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa77c91e209131cea7556d.md>)

[Implementation](<https://github.com/xiasong0501/CEM>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Attack Method":"Dec.-based MIA \[29\]"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### PATROL

SSIM: 0.478. Result ID: 699569f43badfaffe65de5bc.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa77c91e209131cea7556d.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa77c91e209131cea7556d.md>)

[Implementation](<https://github.com/xiasong0501/CEM>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Attack Method":"Dec.-based MIA \[29\]"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### Noise\_ARL+CEM

SSIM: 0.457. Result ID: 699569f43badfaffe65de5c3.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa77c91e209131cea7556d.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa77c91e209131cea7556d.md>)

[Implementation](<https://github.com/xiasong0501/CEM>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Attack Method":"Dec.-based MIA \[29\]"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### PATROL+CEM

SSIM: 0.44. Result ID: 699569f43badfaffe65de5bd.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa77c91e209131cea7556d.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa77c91e209131cea7556d.md>)

[Implementation](<https://github.com/xiasong0501/CEM>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Attack Method":"Dec.-based MIA \[29\]"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

Page 1 of 1. This is an index page, not the full collection.
