# Minimum Volume Enclosing Ellipsoid optimization on Example 3 MVEE 1000 randomized instances

Source: [Minimum Volume Enclosing Ellipsoid optimization on Example 3 MVEE 1000 randomized instances](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/minimum-volume-enclosing-ellipsoid-optimization-on-example-3-mvee-1000-randomized-instances>)

Collection index: [llms.txt](<https://www.sota2.com/research/llms.txt>)

Data updated: 2026-06-09T10:04:08.547Z

Evaluation of algorithms solving the Minimum Volume Enclosing Ellipsoid (MVEE) optimization problem using 1000 randomized instances from the Example 3 set. Performance is primarily measured by average solving time.

A research result applies to its stated dataset, split, metric and evaluation configuration. Compare like-for-like settings, preserve the metric's unit and direction, and distinguish paper-reported results from independent reproduction. The best result recorded here is not a claim of exhaustive, current global coverage.

| Scope | Recorded value |
| --- | --- |
| Task | Minimum Volume Enclosing Ellipsoid optimization |
| Dataset (including any stated split) | Example 3 MVEE 1000 randomized instances |
| Metric | Average Solving Time (ms) |
| Unit | TIME |
| Direction | Lower is better |
| Results loaded | 12 of 12 |
| Coverage | All results currently returned for this benchmark |

Evaluation settings may differ between results. The original papers and recorded configurations are needed to establish comparability. A shared metric name alone does not establish an identical protocol.

## Metrics

- [Average Solving Time (ms)](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/minimum-volume-enclosing-ellipsoid-optimization-on-example-3-mvee-1000-randomized-instances.md?metric=Average%20Solving%20Time%20(ms)>): Lower is better; unit: TIME.

## Recorded results

| Method | Average Solving Time (ms) | Result date | Report paper |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| sMEL-ADMM | 0.18 | Not recorded | 6a279e7c90966ade919bfbe3 |
| sMEL-ADMM | 0.23 | Not recorded | 6a279e7c90966ade919bfbe3 |
| sMEL-ADMM | 0.3 | Not recorded | 6a279e7c90966ade919bfbe3 |
| sMEL-ADMM | 0.38 | Not recorded | 6a279e7c90966ade919bfbe3 |
| Clarabel | 0.79 | Not recorded | 6a279e7c90966ade919bfbe3 |
| Clarabel | 0.84 | Not recorded | 6a279e7c90966ade919bfbe3 |
| Clarabel | 0.89 | Not recorded | 6a279e7c90966ade919bfbe3 |
| Clarabel | 0.92 | Not recorded | 6a279e7c90966ade919bfbe3 |
| Mosek | 1.36 | Not recorded | 6a279e7c90966ade919bfbe3 |
| Mosek | 1.44 | Not recorded | 6a279e7c90966ade919bfbe3 |
| Mosek | 1.66 | Not recorded | 6a279e7c90966ade919bfbe3 |
| Mosek | 1.67 | Not recorded | 6a279e7c90966ade919bfbe3 |

### sMEL-ADMM

Average Solving Time (ms): 0.18. Result ID: 6a27e4d6fbc373592c253385.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/6a279e7c90966ade919bfbe3.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/6a279e7c90966ade919bfbe3.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Number of constraints (m)":"55","Optimality gap (g\_opt)":"1%"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### sMEL-ADMM

Average Solving Time (ms): 0.23. Result ID: 6a27e4d6fbc373592c253387.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/6a279e7c90966ade919bfbe3.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/6a279e7c90966ade919bfbe3.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Number of constraints (m)":"75","Optimality gap (g\_opt)":"1%"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### sMEL-ADMM

Average Solving Time (ms): 0.3. Result ID: 6a27e4d6fbc373592c253386.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/6a279e7c90966ade919bfbe3.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/6a279e7c90966ade919bfbe3.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Number of constraints (m)":"55","Optimality gap (g\_opt)":"0.1%"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### sMEL-ADMM

Average Solving Time (ms): 0.38. Result ID: 6a27e4d6fbc373592c253388.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/6a279e7c90966ade919bfbe3.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/6a279e7c90966ade919bfbe3.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Number of constraints (m)":"75","Optimality gap (g\_opt)":"0.1%"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### Clarabel

Average Solving Time (ms): 0.79. Result ID: 6a27e4d6fbc373592c253381.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/6a279e7c90966ade919bfbe3.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa5bca1e209131ce9cb6c6.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Number of constraints (m)":"55","Optimality gap (g\_opt)":"1%"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### Clarabel

Average Solving Time (ms): 0.84. Result ID: 6a27e4d6fbc373592c253382.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/6a279e7c90966ade919bfbe3.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa5bca1e209131ce9cb6c6.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Number of constraints (m)":"55","Optimality gap (g\_opt)":"0.1%"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### Clarabel

Average Solving Time (ms): 0.89. Result ID: 6a27e4d6fbc373592c253383.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/6a279e7c90966ade919bfbe3.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa5bca1e209131ce9cb6c6.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Number of constraints (m)":"75","Optimality gap (g\_opt)":"1%"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### Clarabel

Average Solving Time (ms): 0.92. Result ID: 6a27e4d6fbc373592c253384.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/6a279e7c90966ade919bfbe3.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa5bca1e209131ce9cb6c6.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Number of constraints (m)":"75","Optimality gap (g\_opt)":"0.1%"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### Mosek

Average Solving Time (ms): 1.36. Result ID: 6a27e4d6fbc373592c25337d.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/6a279e7c90966ade919bfbe3.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Number of constraints (m)":"55","Optimality gap (g\_opt)":"1%"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### Mosek

Average Solving Time (ms): 1.44. Result ID: 6a27e4d6fbc373592c25337e.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/6a279e7c90966ade919bfbe3.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Number of constraints (m)":"55","Optimality gap (g\_opt)":"0.1%"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### Mosek

Average Solving Time (ms): 1.66. Result ID: 6a27e4d6fbc373592c25337f.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/6a279e7c90966ade919bfbe3.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Number of constraints (m)":"75","Optimality gap (g\_opt)":"1%"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### Mosek

Average Solving Time (ms): 1.67. Result ID: 6a27e4d6fbc373592c253380.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/6a279e7c90966ade919bfbe3.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Number of constraints (m)":"75","Optimality gap (g\_opt)":"0.1%"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

Page 1 of 1. This is an index page, not the full collection.
