# Medical Reasoning on MedQuAD complete benchmark Source: [Medical Reasoning on MedQuAD complete benchmark]() Collection index: [llms.txt]() Data updated: 2026-02-26T05:45:09.406Z Evaluation of model performance on the MedQuAD complete benchmark, focusing on medical reasoning capabilities and tracking execution success rates (completion and failure rates). A research result applies to its stated dataset, split, metric and evaluation configuration. Compare like-for-like settings, preserve the metric's unit and direction, and distinguish paper-reported results from independent reproduction. The best result recorded here is not a claim of exhaustive, current global coverage. | Scope | Recorded value | | --- | --- | | Task | Medical Reasoning | | Dataset (including any stated split) | MedQuAD complete benchmark | | Metric | Failure Rate | | Unit | PERCENT | | Direction | Lower is better | | Results loaded | 1 of 1 | | Coverage | All results currently returned for this benchmark | Evaluation settings may differ between results. The original papers and recorded configurations are needed to establish comparability. A shared metric name alone does not establish an identical protocol. ## Metrics - [Failure Rate](): Lower is better; unit: PERCENT. - [Completion Rate](): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT. ## Recorded results | Method | Failure Rate | Result date | Report paper | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Meddollina | 0 | Not recorded | 69802f68a8b01e76cc8e14d8 | ### Meddollina Failure Rate: 0. Result ID: 699615ec5698665ec4558348. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Evaluation Protocol":"Clinically Grounded Evaluation","Number of Cases":"16,412"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. Page 1 of 1. This is an index page, not the full collection.