# MC-FCP on P&R-NYC Dataset (test) Source: [MC-FCP on P&R-NYC Dataset (test)]() Collection index: [llms.txt]() Data updated: 2026-02-26T05:36:07.127Z Evaluation of MC-FCP performance on the test split of the P&R-NYC Dataset, focusing on choice probability metrics across different client segments. A research result applies to its stated dataset, split, metric and evaluation configuration. Compare like-for-like settings, preserve the metric's unit and direction, and distinguish paper-reported results from independent reproduction. The best result recorded here is not a claim of exhaustive, current global coverage. | Scope | Recorded value | | --- | --- | | Task | MC-FCP | | Dataset (including any stated split) | P&R-NYC Dataset (test) | | Metric | Avg Choice Prob (Bottom 5%) | | Unit | SCALAR | | Direction | Higher is better | | Results loaded | 12 of 12 | | Coverage | All results currently returned for this benchmark | Evaluation settings may differ between results. The original papers and recorded configurations are needed to establish comparability. A shared metric name alone does not establish an identical protocol. ## Metrics - [Avg Choice Prob (Bottom 5%)](): Higher is better; unit: SCALAR. - [Avg Choice Prob (All Clients)](): Higher is better; unit: SCALAR. ## Recorded results | Method | Avg Choice Prob (Bottom 5%) | Result date | Report paper | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Clustering Approach | 0.446 | Not recorded | 68fa59541e209131ce9b5eca | | ERM | 0.42 | Not recorded | 68fa59541e209131ce9b5eca | | Clustering Approach | 0.417 | Not recorded | 68fa59541e209131ce9b5eca | | Clustering Approach | 0.417 | Not recorded | 68fa59541e209131ce9b5eca | | Clustering Approach | 0.417 | Not recorded | 68fa59541e209131ce9b5eca | | Clustering Approach | 0.416 | Not recorded | 68fa59541e209131ce9b5eca | | Clustering Approach | 0.416 | Not recorded | 68fa59541e209131ce9b5eca | | ERM | 0.15 | Not recorded | 68fa59541e209131ce9b5eca | | Clustering Approach | 0.093 | Not recorded | 68fa59541e209131ce9b5eca | | Clustering Approach | 0.093 | Not recorded | 68fa59541e209131ce9b5eca | | ERM | 0.069 | Not recorded | 68fa59541e209131ce9b5eca | | Clustering Approach | 0.069 | Not recorded | 68fa59541e209131ce9b5eca | ### Clustering Approach Avg Choice Prob (Bottom 5%): 0.446. Result ID: 698ba64b7a967eddb7705263. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Number of facilities (m)":13,"Regularization parameter (xi)":"1E4"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### ERM Avg Choice Prob (Bottom 5%): 0.42. Result ID: 698ba64b7a967eddb7705260. [Reporting paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Number of facilities (m)":13}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### Clustering Approach Avg Choice Prob (Bottom 5%): 0.417. Result ID: 698ba64b7a967eddb770525d. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Number of facilities (m)":10,"Regularization parameter (xi)":"1E2"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### Clustering Approach Avg Choice Prob (Bottom 5%): 0.417. Result ID: 698ba64b7a967eddb7705261. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Number of facilities (m)":13,"Regularization parameter (xi)":"1E2"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### Clustering Approach Avg Choice Prob (Bottom 5%): 0.417. Result ID: 698ba64b7a967eddb7705262. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Number of facilities (m)":13,"Regularization parameter (xi)":"1E3"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### Clustering Approach Avg Choice Prob (Bottom 5%): 0.416. Result ID: 698ba64b7a967eddb770525e. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Number of facilities (m)":10,"Regularization parameter (xi)":"1E3"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### Clustering Approach Avg Choice Prob (Bottom 5%): 0.416. Result ID: 698ba64b7a967eddb770525f. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Number of facilities (m)":10,"Regularization parameter (xi)":"1E4"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### ERM Avg Choice Prob (Bottom 5%): 0.15. Result ID: 698ba64b7a967eddb770525c. [Reporting paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Number of facilities (m)":10}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### Clustering Approach Avg Choice Prob (Bottom 5%): 0.093. Result ID: 698ba64b7a967eddb770525a. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Number of facilities (m)":7,"Regularization parameter (xi)":"1E3"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### Clustering Approach Avg Choice Prob (Bottom 5%): 0.093. Result ID: 698ba64b7a967eddb770525b. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Number of facilities (m)":7,"Regularization parameter (xi)":"1E4"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### ERM Avg Choice Prob (Bottom 5%): 0.069. Result ID: 698ba64b7a967eddb7705258. [Reporting paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Number of facilities (m)":7}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### Clustering Approach Avg Choice Prob (Bottom 5%): 0.069. Result ID: 698ba64b7a967eddb7705259. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Number of facilities (m)":7,"Regularization parameter (xi)":"1E2"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. Page 1 of 1. This is an index page, not the full collection.