# Matching on Profiles n=1000 matches (synthetic)

Source: [Matching on Profiles n=1000 matches (synthetic)](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/matching-on-profiles-n-1000-matches-synthetic>)

Collection index: [llms.txt](<https://www.sota2.com/research/llms.txt>)

Data updated: 2026-04-07T10:17:28.877Z

Evaluation of general Matching performance on the synthetic dataset consisting of 1000 profile matches, measured using Precision@5, Recall@5, and nDCG@5.

A research result applies to its stated dataset, split, metric and evaluation configuration. Compare like-for-like settings, preserve the metric's unit and direction, and distinguish paper-reported results from independent reproduction. The best result recorded here is not a claim of exhaustive, current global coverage.

| Scope | Recorded value |
| --- | --- |
| Task | Matching |
| Dataset (including any stated split) | Profiles n=1000 matches (synthetic) |
| Metric | Precision@5 |
| Unit | PERCENT |
| Direction | Higher is better |
| Results loaded | 6 of 6 |
| Coverage | All results currently returned for this benchmark |

Evaluation settings may differ between results. The original papers and recorded configurations are needed to establish comparability. A shared metric name alone does not establish an identical protocol.

## Metrics

- [Precision@5](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/matching-on-profiles-n-1000-matches-synthetic.md?metric=Precision%405>): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT.

- [Recall@5](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/matching-on-profiles-n-1000-matches-synthetic.md?metric=Recall%405>): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT.

- [nDCG@5](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/matching-on-profiles-n-1000-matches-synthetic.md?metric=nDCG%405>): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT.

## Recorded results

| Method | Precision@5 | Result date | Report paper |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Cognibit | 68.7 | Not recorded | 69d48fe17d0172140ec74757 |
| Simple LLM | 42.3 | Not recorded | 69d48fe17d0172140ec74757 |
| Hybrid | 34.8 | Not recorded | 69d48fe17d0172140ec74757 |
| CF | 31.2 | Not recorded | 69d48fe17d0172140ec74757 |
| CB | 28.7 | Not recorded | 69d48fe17d0172140ec74757 |
| Random | 5.1 | Not recorded | 69d48fe17d0172140ec74757 |

### Cognibit

Precision@5: 68.7. Result ID: 69d4d9b547f34ce924bd3b38.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/69d48fe17d0172140ec74757.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/69d48fe17d0172140ec74757.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Cost/Match":"$18.20"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### Simple LLM

Precision@5: 42.3. Result ID: 69d4d9b547f34ce924bd3b37.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/69d48fe17d0172140ec74757.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Cost/Match":"$0.85"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### Hybrid

Precision@5: 34.8. Result ID: 69d4d9b547f34ce924bd3b36.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/69d48fe17d0172140ec74757.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Cost/Match":"$0.02"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### CF

Precision@5: 31.2. Result ID: 69d4d9b547f34ce924bd3b34.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/69d48fe17d0172140ec74757.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Cost/Match":"$0.01"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### CB

Precision@5: 28.7. Result ID: 69d4d9b547f34ce924bd3b35.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/69d48fe17d0172140ec74757.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Cost/Match":"$0.01"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### Random

Precision@5: 5.1. Result ID: 69d4d9b547f34ce924bd3b33.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/69d48fe17d0172140ec74757.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Cost/Match":"$0.00"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

Page 1 of 1. This is an index page, not the full collection.