# Manner of Articulation Classification on study2 matched condition (val)

Source: [Manner of Articulation Classification on study2 matched condition (val)](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/manner-of-articulation-classification-on-study2-matched-condition-val>)

Collection index: [llms.txt](<https://www.sota2.com/research/llms.txt>)

Data updated: 2026-04-06T07:35:08.227Z

Evaluation of Manner of Articulation Classification performance on the validation split of the study2 matched condition dataset, reporting ERP Accuracy and DDA Accuracy.

A research result applies to its stated dataset, split, metric and evaluation configuration. Compare like-for-like settings, preserve the metric's unit and direction, and distinguish paper-reported results from independent reproduction. The best result recorded here is not a claim of exhaustive, current global coverage.

| Scope | Recorded value |
| --- | --- |
| Task | Manner of Articulation Classification |
| Dataset (including any stated split) | study2 matched condition (val) |
| Metric | ERP Accuracy |
| Unit | PERCENT |
| Direction | Higher is better |
| Results loaded | 7 of 7 |
| Coverage | All results currently returned for this benchmark |

Evaluation settings may differ between results. The original papers and recorded configurations are needed to establish comparability. A shared metric name alone does not establish an identical protocol.

## Metrics

- [ERP Accuracy](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/manner-of-articulation-classification-on-study2-matched-condition-val.md?metric=ERP%20Accuracy>): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT.

- [DDA Accuracy](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/manner-of-articulation-classification-on-study2-matched-condition-val.md?metric=DDA%20Accuracy>): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT.

## Recorded results

| Method | ERP Accuracy | Result date | Report paper |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| ShallowConvNet | 85.7 | Not recorded | 69d33e0d7d0172140ec736c7 |
| EEGNet | 85.7 | Not recorded | 69d33e0d7d0172140ec736c7 |
| EEG-Conformer | 85.7 | Not recorded | 69d33e0d7d0172140ec736c7 |
| CIPHER | 85.2 | Not recorded | 69d33e0d7d0172140ec736c7 |
| LDA | 76.9 | Not recorded | 69d33e0d7d0172140ec736c7 |
| LR | 59 | Not recorded | 69d33e0d7d0172140ec736c7 |
| Chance | 50 | Not recorded | 69d33e0d7d0172140ec736c7 |

### ShallowConvNet

ERP Accuracy: 85.7. Result ID: 69d3618d47f34ce924bad7d7.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/69d33e0d7d0172140ec736c7.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa647b1e209131cea04b1b.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Condition":"NULL","Reporting":"3-seed means"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### EEGNet

ERP Accuracy: 85.7. Result ID: 69d3618d47f34ce924bad7d8.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/69d33e0d7d0172140ec736c7.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa5ee01e209131ce9e5f5a.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Condition":"NULL","Reporting":"3-seed means"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### EEG-Conformer

ERP Accuracy: 85.7. Result ID: 69d3618d47f34ce924bad7d9.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/69d33e0d7d0172140ec736c7.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Condition":"NULL","Reporting":"3-seed means"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### CIPHER

ERP Accuracy: 85.2. Result ID: 69d3618d47f34ce924bad7da.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/69d33e0d7d0172140ec736c7.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/69d33e0d7d0172140ec736c7.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Condition":"NULL","Reporting":"3-seed means"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### LDA

ERP Accuracy: 76.9. Result ID: 69d3618d47f34ce924bad7d6.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/69d33e0d7d0172140ec736c7.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Condition":"NULL","Reporting":"mean+std"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### LR

ERP Accuracy: 59. Result ID: 69d3618d47f34ce924bad7d5.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/69d33e0d7d0172140ec736c7.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Condition":"NULL","Reporting":"mean+std"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### Chance

ERP Accuracy: 50. Result ID: 69d3618d47f34ce924bad7d4.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/69d33e0d7d0172140ec736c7.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Condition":"NULL"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

Page 1 of 1. This is an index page, not the full collection.
