# Machine Unlearning on CIFAR-10 Class-wise forgetting Source: [Machine Unlearning on CIFAR-10 Class-wise forgetting]() Collection index: [llms.txt]() Data updated: 2026-05-08T09:17:39.633Z Evaluation of Machine Unlearning effectiveness on the CIFAR-10 dataset under a class-wise forgetting scenario, reporting metrics related to retention accuracy (RA), forgetting accuracy (FA), target accuracy (TA), membership inference effectiveness (MIA-Eff.), and computational time. A research result applies to its stated dataset, split, metric and evaluation configuration. Compare like-for-like settings, preserve the metric's unit and direction, and distinguish paper-reported results from independent reproduction. The best result recorded here is not a claim of exhaustive, current global coverage. | Scope | Recorded value | | --- | --- | | Task | Machine Unlearning | | Dataset (including any stated split) | CIFAR-10 Class-wise forgetting | | Metric | Retention Accuracy (RA) | | Unit | PERCENT | | Direction | Higher is better | | Results loaded | 11 of 11 | | Coverage | All results currently returned for this benchmark | Evaluation settings may differ between results. The original papers and recorded configurations are needed to establish comparability. A shared metric name alone does not establish an identical protocol. ## Metrics - [Retention Accuracy (RA)](): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT. - [Forgetting Accuracy (FA)](): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT. - [Target Accuracy (TA)](): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT. - [Accuracy Difference](): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT. - [MIA Effectiveness](): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT. - [Time](): Lower is better; unit: TIME. ## Recorded results | Method | Retention Accuracy (RA) | Result date | Report paper | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Retrain | 99.99 | Not recorded | 69fd6e435497b3b670c895f9 | | ROSU | 99.96 | Not recorded | 69fd6e435497b3b670c895f9 | | UAM | 99.91 | Not recorded | 69fd6e435497b3b670c895f9 | | FF | 98.95 | Not recorded | 69fd6e435497b3b670c895f9 | | OrthoGrad | 98.59 | Not recorded | 69fd6e435497b3b670c895f9 | | PCGrad | 98.58 | Not recorded | 69fd6e435497b3b670c895f9 | | FT | 98.22 | Not recorded | 69fd6e435497b3b670c895f9 | | ℓ1-sparse | 97.18 | Not recorded | 69fd6e435497b3b670c895f9 | | GU | 94.2 | Not recorded | 69fd6e435497b3b670c895f9 | | IU | 90.86 | Not recorded | 69fd6e435497b3b670c895f9 | | NG | 88.03 | Not recorded | 69fd6e435497b3b670c895f9 | ### Retrain Retention Accuracy (RA): 99.99. Result ID: 69fda93147f34ce924e0e0f8. [Reporting paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: Not recorded. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### ROSU Retention Accuracy (RA): 99.96. Result ID: 69fda93147f34ce924e0e102. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: Not recorded. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### UAM Retention Accuracy (RA): 99.91. Result ID: 69fda93147f34ce924e0e101. [Reporting paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: Not recorded. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### FF Retention Accuracy (RA): 98.95. Result ID: 69fda93147f34ce924e0e0fb. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: Not recorded. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### OrthoGrad Retention Accuracy (RA): 98.59. Result ID: 69fda93147f34ce924e0e0ff. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: Not recorded. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### PCGrad Retention Accuracy (RA): 98.58. Result ID: 69fda93147f34ce924e0e100. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: Not recorded. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### FT Retention Accuracy (RA): 98.22. Result ID: 69fda93147f34ce924e0e0f9. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: Not recorded. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### ℓ1-sparse Retention Accuracy (RA): 97.18. Result ID: 69fda93147f34ce924e0e0fd. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: Not recorded. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### GU Retention Accuracy (RA): 94.2. Result ID: 69fda93147f34ce924e0e0fe. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: Not recorded. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### IU Retention Accuracy (RA): 90.86. Result ID: 69fda93147f34ce924e0e0fc. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: Not recorded. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### NG Retention Accuracy (RA): 88.03. Result ID: 69fda93147f34ce924e0e0fa. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: Not recorded. This record does not assert independent reproduction. Page 1 of 1. This is an index page, not the full collection.