# Logical Reasoning on RP Distribution, Npred ≤ 60, 6 \< δ ≤ 12 (train)

Source: [Logical Reasoning on RP Distribution, Npred ≤ 60, 6 \< δ ≤ 12 (train)](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/logical-reasoning-on-rp-distribution-npred-60-6-12-train>)

Collection index: [llms.txt](<https://www.sota2.com/research/llms.txt>)

Data updated: 2026-05-07T06:55:46.593Z

Evaluation of model performance on Logical Reasoning using the training subset of the RP Distribution dataset constrained by Npred ≤ 60 and 6 \< δ ≤ 12, measured by Accuracy.

A research result applies to its stated dataset, split, metric and evaluation configuration. Compare like-for-like settings, preserve the metric's unit and direction, and distinguish paper-reported results from independent reproduction. The best result recorded here is not a claim of exhaustive, current global coverage.

| Scope | Recorded value |
| --- | --- |
| Task | Logical Reasoning |
| Dataset (including any stated split) | RP Distribution, Npred ≤ 60, 6 \< δ ≤ 12 (train) |
| Metric | Accuracy |
| Unit | PERCENT |
| Direction | Higher is better |
| Results loaded | 5 of 5 |
| Coverage | All results currently returned for this benchmark |

Evaluation settings may differ between results. The original papers and recorded configurations are needed to establish comparability. A shared metric name alone does not establish an identical protocol.

## Metrics

- [Accuracy](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/logical-reasoning-on-rp-distribution-npred-60-6-12-train.md?metric=Accuracy>): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT.

## Recorded results

| Method | Accuracy | Result date | Report paper |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| direct w. L = 128 | 88.9 | Not recorded | 69fc1c725497b3b670c88433 |
| cot w. L = 64 | 85.8 | Not recorded | 69fc1c725497b3b670c88433 |
| cot w. L = 128 | 81 | Not recorded | 69fc1c725497b3b670c88433 |
| cot (baseline) | 75.2 | Not recorded | 69fc1c725497b3b670c88433 |
| direct (baseline) | 74.9 | Not recorded | 69fc1c725497b3b670c88433 |

### direct w. L = 128

Accuracy: 88.9. Result ID: 69fc368947f34ce924de8366.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/69fc1c725497b3b670c88433.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/69fc1c725497b3b670c88433.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Reasoning Strategy":"Direct","Number of Layers":"128"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### cot w. L = 64

Accuracy: 85.8. Result ID: 69fc368947f34ce924de8368.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/69fc1c725497b3b670c88433.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/69fc1c725497b3b670c88433.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Reasoning Strategy":"CoT","Number of Layers":"64"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### cot w. L = 128

Accuracy: 81. Result ID: 69fc368947f34ce924de8369.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/69fc1c725497b3b670c88433.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/69fc1c725497b3b670c88433.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Reasoning Strategy":"CoT","Number of Layers":"128"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### cot (baseline)

Accuracy: 75.2. Result ID: 69fc368947f34ce924de8367.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/69fc1c725497b3b670c88433.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/69fc1c725497b3b670c88433.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Reasoning Strategy":"CoT"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### direct (baseline)

Accuracy: 74.9. Result ID: 69fc368947f34ce924de8365.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/69fc1c725497b3b670c88433.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/69fc1c725497b3b670c88433.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Reasoning Strategy":"Direct"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

Page 1 of 1. This is an index page, not the full collection.