# LLM Detection Interpretability on M4 (test)

Source: [LLM Detection Interpretability on M4 (test)](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/llm-detection-interpretability-on-m4-test>)

Collection index: [llms.txt](<https://www.sota2.com/research/llms.txt>)

Data updated: 2026-05-06T07:25:09.534Z

Evaluation of the interpretability of LLM detection models using the test split of the M4 dataset, measured by the accuracy of human judgments.

A research result applies to its stated dataset, split, metric and evaluation configuration. Compare like-for-like settings, preserve the metric's unit and direction, and distinguish paper-reported results from independent reproduction. The best result recorded here is not a claim of exhaustive, current global coverage.

| Scope | Recorded value |
| --- | --- |
| Task | LLM Detection Interpretability |
| Dataset (including any stated split) | M4 (test) |
| Metric | Accuracy (Human Judgements) |
| Unit | PERCENT |
| Direction | Higher is better |
| Results loaded | 4 of 4 |
| Coverage | All results currently returned for this benchmark |

Evaluation settings may differ between results. The original papers and recorded configurations are needed to establish comparability. A shared metric name alone does not establish an identical protocol.

## Metrics

- [Accuracy (Human Judgements)](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/llm-detection-interpretability-on-m4-test.md?metric=Accuracy%20(Human%20Judgements)>): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT.

## Recorded results

| Method | Accuracy (Human Judgements) | Result date | Report paper |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| ExaGPT | 61.5 | Not recorded | 68fa76fe1e209131cea704c7 |
| LR-GLTR | 57.3 | Not recorded | 68fa76fe1e209131cea704c7 |
| DNA-GPT | 53.1 | Not recorded | 68fa76fe1e209131cea704c7 |
| RoBERTa | 47.9 | Not recorded | 68fa76fe1e209131cea704c7 |

### ExaGPT

Accuracy (Human Judgements): 61.5. Result ID: 69faec5e47f34ce924dd7494.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa76fe1e209131cea704c7.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa76fe1e209131cea704c7.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: Not recorded. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### LR-GLTR

Accuracy (Human Judgements): 57.3. Result ID: 69faec5e47f34ce924dd7492.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa76fe1e209131cea704c7.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa72711e209131cea56537.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: Not recorded. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### DNA-GPT

Accuracy (Human Judgements): 53.1. Result ID: 69faec5e47f34ce924dd7493.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa76fe1e209131cea704c7.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa70cb1e209131cea4d2e1.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: Not recorded. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### RoBERTa

Accuracy (Human Judgements): 47.9. Result ID: 69faec5e47f34ce924dd7491.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa76fe1e209131cea704c7.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa6e721e209131cea3fdde.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: Not recorded. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

Page 1 of 1. This is an index page, not the full collection.
