# LLM-as-a-judge on HH-RLHF Source: [LLM-as-a-judge on HH-RLHF]() Collection index: [llms.txt]() Data updated: 2026-05-18T07:07:51.681Z Evaluation of LLM performance using the LLM-as-a-Judge framework on the HH-RLHF dataset, measured by Coverage and Success percentages. A research result applies to its stated dataset, split, metric and evaluation configuration. Compare like-for-like settings, preserve the metric's unit and direction, and distinguish paper-reported results from independent reproduction. The best result recorded here is not a claim of exhaustive, current global coverage. | Scope | Recorded value | | --- | --- | | Task | LLM-as-a-judge | | Dataset (including any stated split) | HH-RLHF | | Metric | Coverage | | Unit | PERCENT | | Direction | Higher is better | | Results loaded | 12 of 12 | | Coverage | All results currently returned for this benchmark | Evaluation settings may differ between results. The original papers and recorded configurations are needed to establish comparability. A shared metric name alone does not establish an identical protocol. ## Metrics - [Coverage](): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT. - [Success](): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT. ## Recorded results | Method | Coverage | Result date | Report paper | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Heuristic Selection | 81.3 | Not recorded | 6a0a9d11dbc836b87d82b3e2 | | Heuristic Selection | 72.4 | Not recorded | 6a0a9d11dbc836b87d82b3e2 | | CSE + Predictive | 72.3 | Not recorded | 6a0a9d11dbc836b87d82b3e2 | | CSE + Predictive | 58.6 | Not recorded | 6a0a9d11dbc836b87d82b3e2 | | CSE + Ours | 47.2 | Not recorded | 6a0a9d11dbc836b87d82b3e2 | | CSE + Random | 45.4 | Not recorded | 6a0a9d11dbc836b87d82b3e2 | | CSE + Simulated | 42.5 | Not recorded | 6a0a9d11dbc836b87d82b3e2 | | CSE + Vanilla | 41.3 | Not recorded | 6a0a9d11dbc836b87d82b3e2 | | CSE + Ours | 36.9 | Not recorded | 6a0a9d11dbc836b87d82b3e2 | | CSE + Random | 34.2 | Not recorded | 6a0a9d11dbc836b87d82b3e2 | | CSE + Vanilla | 32.7 | Not recorded | 6a0a9d11dbc836b87d82b3e2 | | CSE + Simulated | 31 | Not recorded | 6a0a9d11dbc836b87d82b3e2 | ### Heuristic Selection Coverage: 81.3. Result ID: 6a0abaae47f34ce924f05dbf. [Reporting paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Cascade":"M → L → O","Target agreement level":"0.85"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### Heuristic Selection Coverage: 72.4. Result ID: 6a0abaae47f34ce924f05db9. [Reporting paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Cascade":"L → Q → O","Target agreement level":"0.85"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### CSE + Predictive Coverage: 72.3. Result ID: 6a0abaae47f34ce924f05dc0. [Reporting paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Cascade":"M → L → O","Target agreement level":"0.85"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### CSE + Predictive Coverage: 58.6. Result ID: 6a0abaae47f34ce924f05dba. [Reporting paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Cascade":"L → Q → O","Target agreement level":"0.85"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### CSE + Ours Coverage: 47.2. Result ID: 6a0abaae47f34ce924f05dc4. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Cascade":"M → L → O","Target agreement level":"0.85"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### CSE + Random Coverage: 45.4. Result ID: 6a0abaae47f34ce924f05dc2. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Cascade":"M → L → O","Target agreement level":"0.85"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### CSE + Simulated Coverage: 42.5. Result ID: 6a0abaae47f34ce924f05dc1. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Cascade":"M → L → O","Target agreement level":"0.85"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### CSE + Vanilla Coverage: 41.3. Result ID: 6a0abaae47f34ce924f05dc3. [Reporting paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Cascade":"M → L → O","Target agreement level":"0.85"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### CSE + Ours Coverage: 36.9. Result ID: 6a0abaae47f34ce924f05dbe. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Cascade":"L → Q → O","Target agreement level":"0.85"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### CSE + Random Coverage: 34.2. Result ID: 6a0abaae47f34ce924f05dbc. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Cascade":"L → Q → O","Target agreement level":"0.85"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### CSE + Vanilla Coverage: 32.7. Result ID: 6a0abaae47f34ce924f05dbd. [Reporting paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Cascade":"L → Q → O","Target agreement level":"0.85"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### CSE + Simulated Coverage: 31. Result ID: 6a0abaae47f34ce924f05dbb. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Cascade":"L → Q → O","Target agreement level":"0.85"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. Page 1 of 1. This is an index page, not the full collection.