# Lithium plating detection and degradation analysis on EEMB LIR-2032 graphite\|\|LiCoO2 coin cells Source: [Lithium plating detection and degradation analysis on EEMB LIR-2032 graphite\|\|LiCoO2 coin cells]() Collection index: [llms.txt]() Data updated: 2026-03-17T06:39:51.192Z Evaluation of models for detecting lithium plating and analyzing degradation characteristics (capacity loss, throughput loss) using the EEMB LIR-2032 graphite\|\|LiCoO2 coin cell dataset. A research result applies to its stated dataset, split, metric and evaluation configuration. Compare like-for-like settings, preserve the metric's unit and direction, and distinguish paper-reported results from independent reproduction. The best result recorded here is not a claim of exhaustive, current global coverage. | Scope | Recorded value | | --- | --- | | Task | Lithium plating detection and degradation analysis | | Dataset (including any stated split) | EEMB LIR-2032 graphite\|\|LiCoO2 coin cells | | Metric | Charge Throughput Decrease Rate | | Unit | PERCENT | | Direction | Lower is better | | Results loaded | 7 of 7 | | Coverage | All results currently returned for this benchmark | Evaluation settings may differ between results. The original papers and recorded configurations are needed to establish comparability. A shared metric name alone does not establish an identical protocol. ## Metrics - [Charge Throughput Decrease Rate](): Lower is better; unit: PERCENT. - [Second Peak \> 4.0 V Indicator](): Higher is better; unit: SCALAR. - [Lithium Plating Detection](): Higher is better; unit: SCALAR. - [RPT Capacity Decrease Rate](): Lower is better; unit: PERCENT. ## Recorded results | Method | Charge Throughput Decrease Rate | Result date | Report paper | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Gaussian Process (GP) framework | 0.029 | Not recorded | 68fa7bfd1e209131cea8bac2 | | Gaussian Process (GP) framework | 0.093 | Not recorded | 68fa7bfd1e209131cea8bac2 | | Gaussian Process (GP) framework | 0.227 | Not recorded | 68fa7bfd1e209131cea8bac2 | | Gaussian Process (GP) framework | 1.464 | Not recorded | 68fa7bfd1e209131cea8bac2 | | Gaussian Process (GP) framework | 1.671 | Not recorded | 68fa7bfd1e209131cea8bac2 | | Gaussian Process (GP) framework | 1.711 | Not recorded | 68fa7bfd1e209131cea8bac2 | | Gaussian Process (GP) framework | 3.617 | Not recorded | 68fa7bfd1e209131cea8bac2 | ### Gaussian Process (GP) framework Charge Throughput Decrease Rate: 0.029. Result ID: 69b8f56747f34ce924a0c90b. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Operating condition":"0.2 C@0 ◦C"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### Gaussian Process (GP) framework Charge Throughput Decrease Rate: 0.093. Result ID: 69b8f56747f34ce924a0c90c. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Operating condition":"1.0 C@40◦C"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### Gaussian Process (GP) framework Charge Throughput Decrease Rate: 0.227. Result ID: 69b8f56747f34ce924a0c90d. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Operating condition":"1.0 C@25◦C"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### Gaussian Process (GP) framework Charge Throughput Decrease Rate: 1.464. Result ID: 69b8f56747f34ce924a0c907. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Operating condition":"1.0 C@10◦C"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### Gaussian Process (GP) framework Charge Throughput Decrease Rate: 1.671. Result ID: 69b8f56747f34ce924a0c908. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Operating condition":"0.4 C@10◦C"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### Gaussian Process (GP) framework Charge Throughput Decrease Rate: 1.711. Result ID: 69b8f56747f34ce924a0c90a. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Operating condition":"0.4 C@0 ◦C"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### Gaussian Process (GP) framework Charge Throughput Decrease Rate: 3.617. Result ID: 69b8f56747f34ce924a0c909. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Operating condition":"0.6 C@0 ◦C"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. Page 1 of 1. This is an index page, not the full collection.