# Land Cover Classification on San Francisco L-band AIRSAR 1989 (test)

Source: [Land Cover Classification on San Francisco L-band AIRSAR 1989 (test)](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/land-cover-classification-on-san-francisco-l-band-airsar-1989-test>)

Collection index: [llms.txt](<https://www.sota2.com/research/llms.txt>)

Data updated: 2026-06-01T09:34:53.880Z

Evaluation of Land Cover Classification performance on the test split of the San Francisco L-band AIRSAR 1989 dataset, reporting per-class accuracies (Bare Soil, Mountain, Water, Urban, Vegetation) and overall metrics (OA, AA, Kappa).

A research result applies to its stated dataset, split, metric and evaluation configuration. Compare like-for-like settings, preserve the metric's unit and direction, and distinguish paper-reported results from independent reproduction. The best result recorded here is not a claim of exhaustive, current global coverage.

| Scope | Recorded value |
| --- | --- |
| Task | Land Cover Classification |
| Dataset (including any stated split) | San Francisco L-band AIRSAR 1989 (test) |
| Metric | Bare Soil Accuracy |
| Unit | PERCENT |
| Direction | Higher is better |
| Results loaded | 7 of 7 |
| Coverage | All results currently returned for this benchmark |

Evaluation settings may differ between results. The original papers and recorded configurations are needed to establish comparability. A shared metric name alone does not establish an identical protocol.

## Metrics

- [Bare Soil Accuracy](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/land-cover-classification-on-san-francisco-l-band-airsar-1989-test.md?metric=Bare%20Soil%20Accuracy>): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT.

- [Mountain Accuracy](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/land-cover-classification-on-san-francisco-l-band-airsar-1989-test.md?metric=Mountain%20Accuracy>): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT.

- [Water Accuracy](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/land-cover-classification-on-san-francisco-l-band-airsar-1989-test.md?metric=Water%20Accuracy>): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT.

- [Urban Accuracy](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/land-cover-classification-on-san-francisco-l-band-airsar-1989-test.md?metric=Urban%20Accuracy>): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT.

- [Vegetation Accuracy](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/land-cover-classification-on-san-francisco-l-band-airsar-1989-test.md?metric=Vegetation%20Accuracy>): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT.

- [Overall Accuracy (OA)](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/land-cover-classification-on-san-francisco-l-band-airsar-1989-test.md?metric=Overall%20Accuracy%20(OA)>): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT.

- [Average Accuracy (AA)](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/land-cover-classification-on-san-francisco-l-band-airsar-1989-test.md?metric=Average%20Accuracy%20(AA)>): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT.

- [Kappa Coefficient](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/land-cover-classification-on-san-francisco-l-band-airsar-1989-test.md?metric=Kappa%20Coefficient>): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT.

## Recorded results

| Method | Bare Soil Accuracy | Result date | Report paper |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| WaveletCNN | 86.74 | Not recorded | 6a1d1229dbd7150506f84067 |
| HybridRVNet | 86.33 | Not recorded | 6a1d1229dbd7150506f84067 |
| 3D-CNN | 85.5 | Not recorded | 6a1d1229dbd7150506f84067 |
| ViT | 79.96 | Not recorded | 6a1d1229dbd7150506f84067 |
| HybridCVNet | 78.8 | Not recorded | 6a1d1229dbd7150506f84067 |
| PolSARFormer | 75.29 | Not recorded | 6a1d1229dbd7150506f84067 |
| swin | 68.16 | Not recorded | 6a1d1229dbd7150506f84067 |

### WaveletCNN

Bare Soil Accuracy: 86.74. Result ID: 6a1d515bfbc373592c16e0ca.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/6a1d1229dbd7150506f84067.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: Not recorded. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### HybridRVNet

Bare Soil Accuracy: 86.33. Result ID: 6a1d515bfbc373592c16e0ce.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/6a1d1229dbd7150506f84067.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Description":"Real-valued variation of proposed network"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### 3D-CNN

Bare Soil Accuracy: 85.5. Result ID: 6a1d515bfbc373592c16e0c9.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/6a1d1229dbd7150506f84067.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: Not recorded. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### ViT

Bare Soil Accuracy: 79.96. Result ID: 6a1d515bfbc373592c16e0cb.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/6a1d1229dbd7150506f84067.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa6a0b1e209131cea25b04.md>)

[Implementation](<https://github.com/google-research/vision_transformer>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: Not recorded. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### HybridCVNet

Bare Soil Accuracy: 78.8. Result ID: 6a1d515bfbc373592c16e0cf.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/6a1d1229dbd7150506f84067.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/6a1d1229dbd7150506f84067.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Description":"Proposed complex-valued network"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### PolSARFormer

Bare Soil Accuracy: 75.29. Result ID: 6a1d515bfbc373592c16e0cd.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/6a1d1229dbd7150506f84067.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: Not recorded. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### swin

Bare Soil Accuracy: 68.16. Result ID: 6a1d515bfbc373592c16e0cc.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/6a1d1229dbd7150506f84067.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa6a8c1e209131cea28b62.md>)

[Implementation](<https://github.com/microsoft/Swin-Transformer>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: Not recorded. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

Page 1 of 1. This is an index page, not the full collection.
