# JPEG (QF=2) Evaluation on ImageNet

Source: [JPEG (QF=2) Evaluation on ImageNet](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/jpeg-qf-2-evaluation-on-imagenet>)

Collection index: [llms.txt](<https://www.sota2.com/research/llms.txt>)

Data updated: 2026-03-10T11:15:28.976Z

Evaluation of image quality restoration performance on the ImageNet dataset, specifically focusing on artifacts introduced by JPEG compression at Quality Factor 2, measured using SSIM.

A research result applies to its stated dataset, split, metric and evaluation configuration. Compare like-for-like settings, preserve the metric's unit and direction, and distinguish paper-reported results from independent reproduction. The best result recorded here is not a claim of exhaustive, current global coverage.

| Scope | Recorded value |
| --- | --- |
| Task | JPEG (QF=2) |
| Dataset (including any stated split) | ImageNet |
| Metric | SSIM |
| Unit | PERCENT |
| Direction | Higher is better |
| Results loaded | 10 of 10 |
| Coverage | All results currently returned for this benchmark |

Evaluation settings may differ between results. The original papers and recorded configurations are needed to establish comparability. A shared metric name alone does not establish an identical protocol.

## Metrics

- [SSIM](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/jpeg-qf-2-evaluation-on-imagenet.md?metric=SSIM>): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT.

- [LPIPS](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/jpeg-qf-2-evaluation-on-imagenet.md?metric=LPIPS>): Lower is better; unit: SCALAR.

## Recorded results

| Method | SSIM | Result date | Report paper |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| G&G | 75 | Not recorded | 69afa5912d603e6de3e43b71 |
| DAPS | 64 | Not recorded | 69afa5912d603e6de3e43b71 |
| RED-DIFF | 61 | Not recorded | 69afa5912d603e6de3e43b71 |
| PNP-DM | 59 | Not recorded | 69afa5912d603e6de3e43b71 |
| DPS | 46 | Not recorded | 69afa5912d603e6de3e43b71 |

### G&G

SSIM: 75. Result ID: 69affd416dbb7075b9595845.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/69afa5912d603e6de3e43b71.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/69afa5912d603e6de3e43b71.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Memory (MB)":"4991","Run time (sec)":"83"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### DAPS

SSIM: 64. Result ID: 69affd416dbb7075b9595846.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/69afa5912d603e6de3e43b71.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa7aa31e209131cea84481.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Memory (MB)":"4993","Run time (sec)":"219"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### RED-DIFF

SSIM: 61. Result ID: 69affd416dbb7075b9595847.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/69afa5912d603e6de3e43b71.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa5af61e209131ce9c4296.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Memory (MB)":"4995","Run time (sec)":"165"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### PNP-DM

SSIM: 59. Result ID: 69affd416dbb7075b9595848.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/69afa5912d603e6de3e43b71.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa759c1e209131cea68f2d.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Memory (MB)":"4993","Run time (sec)":"636"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### DPS

SSIM: 46. Result ID: 69affd416dbb7075b9595849.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/69afa5912d603e6de3e43b71.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa7bdd1e209131cea8adbc.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Memory (MB)":"8701","Run time (sec)":"360"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

Page 1 of 1. This is an index page, not the full collection.